Abstract
The construction of word meanings in a discourse context was conceptualized as a process of sense activation, sense selection, and sense elaboration. In three experiments, subjects read texts presented by a rapid serial visual procedure and performed a lexical decision on visually presented targets that followed ambiguous prime words. When the target was a word, it was either an associate of the prime word, a probable inference suggested by the discourse, or an unrelated word. For associates, lexical decisions that related to either the appropriate or the inappropriate sense of the ambiguous word were generally facilitated at short (200-400 msec) prime-target stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs). At longer SOAs, responses were faster to appropriate than to inappropriate associates. For the thematic inferences, there was no difference between these (appropriate) inferences and (inappropriate) control words at short SOAs. At long SOAs (1,000 and 1,500 msec), however, inference words were facilitated. The results are interpreted as consistent with a model of lexical processing in which sense activation functions independently of context. Discourse context effects, whether on sense selection (suppression of inappropriate associates) or on sense elaboration (creation of inferences), are seen as postlexical.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barclay, J. R., Bransford, J., Franks, J., McCarreli.,N., &Nitsch, K. (1974). Comprehension and semantic flexibility.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,13, 471–481.
Burgess, C., Seidenberg, M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1986, November).Nonword interference and lexical ambiguity resolution. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans
Cramer, P. (1970). A study of homographs In L. Postman & G. Keppel (Eds.),Norms of word association (pp. 361–382). New York: Academic Press.
Fischler, I., &Goodman, G. O. (1978). Latency of associative activation in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,4, 455–470.
Galambos, J. A. (1982).Normative studies of six characteristics of our knowledge of common activities (Cognitive Science Tech. Rep. 14). New Haven, CT: Yale University.
Glucksberg, S., Kreuz, R. J., &Rho, S. (1986). Context can constrain lexical access: Implications for models of language comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 323–335.
Greenspan, S. L. (1986). Semantic flexibility and referential specificity of concrete nouns.Journal of Memory & Language,25,539–557.
Guindon, R., &Kintsch, W. (1984). Priming macropropositions: Evidence for the primacy of macropropositions in the memory for text.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 508–518.
Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixation to comprehension.Psychological Review,87, 329–354
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.Psychological Review,95, 163–182. orKintsch, W. (In press). The representation of knowledge and the use of knowledge in discourse comprehension. In C. Graumann & R. Dietrich (Eds.),Language in the social context. New York: Springer.
Kintsch, W., &Mross, E. F. (1985). Context effects in word identification.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 336–349.
Kuĉera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Mckoon, G., &Ratcliff, R. (1986). Inferences about predictable eventsJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 82–91.
Onifer, W., &Swinney, D. A. (1981). Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias.Memory & Cognition,9, 225–236.
Seidenberg, M. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M, &Bienkowski, M. (1982). Automatic access of the meaning of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing.Cognitive Psychology,14, 489–537.
Sharkey, N. E., &Mitchell, D. C. (1985). Word recognition in a functional context.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 253–270
Sharkey, N. E., &Sharkey, A. J. C. (1987). What is the point of integration? The loci of knowledge-based facilitation in sentence processing.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 255–276.
Simpson, G. B. (1984). Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition.Psychological Bulletin,96, 316–340.
Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 645–659.
Taft, M. (1982). An alternative to grapheme-phoneme conversion rules?Memory & Cognition,10, 465–474.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M.. &Seidenberg, M. S. (1979) Evidence for multiple stages in the processing of ambiguous words m syntactic contexts.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 427–440.
Till, R E. (1977). Sentence memory prompted with inferential recall cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,3, 129–141.
Till, R. E., &Walsh, D. A. (1980). Encoding and retrieval factors in adult memory for implicational sentences.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 1–16.
Van Dijk, T, &Kintsch, W. (1983).Strategies of discourse comprehension New York: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by Grant MH-15872-18 from the National Institute of Mental Health to Walter Kintsch. Experiment 1 was conducted at the University of Colorado while Robert Till was on sabbatical there. Experiments 2 and 3 were conducted at the University of North Dakota.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Till, R.E., Mross, E.F. & Kintsch, W. Time course of priming for associate and inference words in a discourse context. Memory & Cognition 16, 283–298 (1988). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197039
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197039