Abstract
We investigated the processing of doubly quantified sentences, such asKelly showed a photo to every critic, that are ambiguous as to whether the indefinite (a photo) specifies single or multiple referents. Ambiguity resolution requires the computation of relative quantifier scope: Whether a or every takes wide scope, thereby determining how many entities or events are to be represented. In an eye-tracking experiment, we manipulated quantifier order and whether continuations were singular or plural, for constructions with the direct or the indirect object occurring first. We obtained effects consistent with the on-line processing of relative scope at the doubly quantified phrase and considered two possible explanations for a preference for singular continuations to the quantified sentence. We conclude that relative quantifier scope is computed on line during reading but may not be a prerequisite for the resolution of definite anaphors, unless required by secondary tasks.
Article PDF
References
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., &Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
Catlin, J., &Micham, D. L. (1975). Semantic representations as procedures for verification.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,4, 209–225.
Cloitre, M., &Bever, T. G. (1988). Linguistic anaphors, levels of representation, and discourse.Language & Cognitive Processes,3, 293–322.
Ferreira, F., &Clifton, C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 348–368.
Fodor, J. D. (1982). The mental representation of quantifiers. In S. Peters & E. Saarinen (Eds.),Processes, beliefs, and questions: Essays on formal semantics of natural language and natural language processing (pp. 129–164). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Fodor, J. D., &Sag, I. (1982). Referential and quantificational indefinites.Linguistics & Philosophy,5, 355–398.
Frazier, L., Pacht, J. M., &Rayner, K. (1999). Taking on semantic commitments: II. Collective versus distributive readings.Cognition,70, 87–104.
Gillen, K. (1991).The comprehension of doubly quantified sentences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Durham.
Ioup, G. (1975). Some universals for quantifier scope. In J. Kimball (Ed.),Syntax and semantics (Vol. 4, pp. 37–58). New York: Academic Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1969). On understanding logically complex sentences.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,21, 1–13.
Kurtzman, H. S., &MacDonald, M. C. (1993). Resolution of quantifier scope ambiguities.Cognition,48, 243–279.
Lakoff, G. (1971). On generative semantics. In D. D. Steinberg & L. A. Jakobovits (Eds.),Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology (pp. 232–296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Larson, R. (1988). On the double object construction.Linguistic Inquiry,19, 335–391.
Liversedge, S. P., &Findlay, J. M. (2000). Saccadic eye movements and cognition.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 6–14.
Micham, D. L., Catlin, J., VanDerveer, N. J., &Loveland, K. A. (1980). Lexical and structural cues to quantifier scope relations.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,9, 367–377.
Poesio, M. (1996). Semantic ambiguity and perceived ambiguity. In K. van Deemter & S. Peters (Eds.),Semantic ambiguity and underspecification (pp. 159–201). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.Psychological Bulletin,124, 372–422.
Tunstall, S. L. (1998).The interpretation of quantifiers: Semantics and processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Department of Linguistics.
van Gompel, R. P. G., Pickering, M. J., &Traxler, M. J. (2000). Unrestricted race: A new model of syntactic ambiguity resolution. In A. Kennedy, R. Radach, D. Heller, & J. Pynte (Eds.),Reading as a perceptual process (pp. 621–648). Oxford: Elsevier.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by an Experimental Psychology Society Study Visit Grant and Grant S19168 from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (U.K.). A complete set of experimental materials may be obtained by e-mail from the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Filik, R., Paterson, K.B. & Liversedge, S.P. Processing doubly quantified sentences: Evidence from eye movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11, 953–959 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196727
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196727