Abstract
We investigated the effect of discourse context on the access of word meaning during reading. Target words were role names (e.g.,electrician) for which there was a gender stereotype (e.g., electricians are stereotypically male). Target sentences contained a reflexive pronoun that referred to the role name (e.g.,The electrician taught herself . . .). Participants read these target sentences with or without paragraph context while their eye movements were monitored. In the absence of discourse context and in neutral discourse contexts, fixation times on the reflexive pronoun and immediately following the pronoun were inflated when the pronoun specified a gender that mismatched the stereotype, indicating that the gender stereotype was activated upon encountering the role name. When prior discourse context indicated the gender of the role-named character, this mismatch effect was eliminated. The mismatch effect indicates that gender stereotypes are automatically activated in the absence of disambiguating information. The lack of an effect when gender has previously been specified is consistent with the lexical reinterpretation model proposed by Hess, Foss, and Carroll (1995).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banaji, M. R., &Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping.Psychological Science,7, 136–141.
Barsalou, L. W. (1982). Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts.Memory & Cognition,10, 82–93.
Carreiras, M., Garnham, A., Oakhill, J., &Cain, K. (1996). The use of stereotypical gender information in constructing a mental model: Evidence from English and Spanish.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,49A, 639–663.
Cook, A., &Myers, J. L. (2004). Processing discourse roles in scripted narratives: The influences of context and world knowledge.Journal of Memory & Language,50, 268–288.
Duffy, S. A., Kambe, G., &Rayner, K. (2001). The effect of prior disambiguating context on the comprehension of ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements. In D. Gorfein (Ed.),On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity (pp. 27- 44). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Duffy, S. A., Morris, R., &Rayner, K. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 429–446.
Duffy, S. A., &Rayner, K. (1990). Eye movements and anaphor resolution: Effect of antecedent typicality and distance.Language & Speech,33, 1003–1019.
Ehrlich, K. (1983). Eye movements in pronoun assignment: A study of sentence integration. In K. Rayner (Ed.),Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes (pp. 253–268). New York: Academic Press.
Ehrlich, K., &Rayner, K. (1983). Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: Eye movements and immediacy of processing.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 75–87.
Foss, D. J., &Speer, S. R. (1991). Global and local context effects in sentence processing. In R. R. Hoffman & D. S. Palermo (Eds.),Cognition and the symbolic processes: Applied and ecological perspectives (pp. 115–139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Garrod, S., Freudenthal, D., &Boyle, E. (1994). The role of different types of anaphor on the on-line resolution of sentences in a discourse.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 39–68.
Garrod, S., &Terras, M. (2000). The contribution of lexical and situational knowledge to resolving discourse roles: Bonding and resolution.Journal of Memory & Language,42, 526–544.
Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., &Faust, M. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,16, 430–445.
Gordon, P. C., &Hendrick, R. (1998). Representation and processing of coreference in discourse.Cognitive Science,22, 389–424.
Greene, S. V., McKoon, G., &Ratcliff, R. (1992). Pronoun resolution and discourse models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 266–283.
Hess, D. J., Foss, D. J., &Carroll, P. (1995). Effects of global and local context on lexical processing during language comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 62–82.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.Psychological Review,95, 163–182.
Liversedge, S. P., Paterson, K. B., &Pickering, M. J. (1998). Eye movements and measures of reading time. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Eye movements in reading and scene perception (pp. 201–222). Oxford: Elsevier.
Osterhout, L., Bersick, M., &McLaughlin, J. (1997). Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes.Memory & Cognition,25, 273–285.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.Psychological Bulletin,124, 372–422.
Rayner, K., &Duffy.S. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.Memory & Cognition,14, 191–201.
Rayner, K., Pacht, J., &Duffy, S. (1994). Effects of prior encounter and global discourse bias on the processing of lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye fixations.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 527–544.
Sanford, A. J., &Garrod, S. C. (1989). What, when, and how? Questions of immediacy in anaphoric reference resolution.Language & Cognitive Processes,4, SI 325–262.
Seidenberg, M. S., Tanenhaus, J. K., Leiman, J. M., &Bienkowski, M. (1982). Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing.Cognitive Psychology,114, 489–537.
Sturt, P. (2003). The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution.Journal of Memory & Language,48, 542–562.
Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 645–659.
Till, R. E., Mross, E. F., &Kintsch, W. (1988). Time course of priming for associate and inference words in a discourse context.Memory & Cognition,16, 283–298.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Correspondence should be addressed to J. Myers, Tobin Hall, 135 Hicks Way, Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003-9271 (email: jlmyers@psych. umass.edu) or K. Rayner (email: rayner@psych.umass.edu).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duffy, S.A., Keir, J.A. Violating stereotypes: Eye movements and comprehension processes when text conflicts with world knowledge. Memory & Cognition 32, 551–559 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195846
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195846