Abstract
Age of acquisition and imageability ratings were collected for 2,645 words, including 892 verbs and 213 function words. Words that were ambiguous as to grammatical category were disambiguated: Verbs were shown in their infinitival form, and nouns (where appropriate) were preceded by the indefinite article (such asto crack anda crack). Subjects were speakers of British English selected from a wide age range, so that differences in the responses across age groups could be compared. Within the subset of early acquired noun/verb homonyms, the verb forms were rated as later acquired than the nouns, and the verb homonyms of high-image ability nouns were rated as significantly less imageable than their noun counterparts. A small number of words received significantly earlier or later age of acquisition ratings when the 20–40 years and 50–80 years age groups were compared. These tend to comprise words that have come to be used more frequently in recent years (either through technological advances or social change), or those that have fallen out of common usage. Regression analyses showed that although word length, familiarity, and concreteness make independent contributions to the age of acquisition measure, frequency and imageability are the most important predictors of rated age of acquisition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, D. A., &Funnell, E. (1981). Components of the mental lexicon.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B,295, 397–410.
Baayen, R.H., Piepenbrock, R., &Gulikers, L. (1995).The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM], Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
Barry, C., Morrison, C. M., &Ellis, A. W. (1997). Naming the Snod-grass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency and name agreement.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50A, 560–585.
Bastiaanse, R., &Jonkers, R. (1998). Verb retrieval in action naming and spontaneous speech in agrammatic and anomic aphasia.Aphasiology,12, 951–969.
Bates, E., Marchman, V., Thal, D., Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, J. S., Reilly, J., &Hartung, J. (1994). Developmental and stylistic variation in the composition of early vocabulary.Journal of Child Language,21, 85–123.
Berndt, R. S., Mitchum, C. C., Haendiges, A. N., &Sandson, J. (1997). Verb retrieval in aphasia: 1. Characterizing single word impairments.Brain & Language,56, 68–106.
Bird, H. (1999).Processing categories of vocabulary in aphasia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
Caramazza, A., &Hillis, A.E. (1991). Lexical organization of nouns and verbs in the brain.Nature,349, 788–790.
Carroll, J. B., &White, M.N. (1973). Word frequency and age of acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,25, 85–95.
Caselli, M. C., Bates, E., Casadio, P., Fenson, J., Fenson, L., Sanders, L., &Weir, J. (1995). A cross-linguistic study of early lexical development.Cognitive Development,10, 159–199.
Coltheart, M. (1981a). The MRC psycholinguistic database.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 497–505.
Coltheart, M. (1981b).MRC psycholinguistic database user manual: Version 1.
Davelaar, E., &Besner, D. (1988). Word identification: Imageability, semantics, and the content-functor distinction.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 789–799.
DeGroot, A. M. B. (1989). Representational aspects of word imageability and word frequency as assessed through word association.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 824–845.
Denes, G., &Dalla Barba, G. (1998). G. B. Vico, precursor of cognitive neuropsychology? The first reported case of noun-verb dissociation following brain damage.Brain & Language,62, 29–33.
Forster, K. I., &Chambers, I. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 627–635.
Franklin, S., Howard, D., &Patterson, K. (1994). Abstract word meaning deafness.Cognitive Neuropsychology,2, 1–34.
Franklin, S., Howard, D., &Patterson, K. (1995). Abstract word anomia.Cognitive Neuropsychology,12, 549–566.
Friederici, A. D., &Schoenle, P. W. (1980). Computational dissociation of two vocabulary types: Evidence from aphasia.Neuropsychologia,18, 11–20.
Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. I. Kuczaj (Ed.),Language development: Language, thought and culture (pp. 301–334). Hills-dale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gilhooly, K. J., &Hay, D. (1977). Imagery, concreteness, age-of-acquisition, familiarity, and meaningfulness value for 205 five-letter words having single-solutionanagrams.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,9, 12–17.
Gilhooly, K. J., &Logie, R. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 395–427.
Gilhooly, K. J., &Logie, R. H. (1981). Word age-of-acquisition and visual recognition thresholds.Current Psychological Research,1, 215–226.
Hanley, R. J., &Kay, J. (1997). An effect of imageability on the production of phonological errors in auditory repetition.Cognitive Neuro-psychology,14, 1065–1084.
Hillis, A. E., &Caramazza, A. (1995). Representation of grammatical categories of words in thebrain.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,7, 396–407.
Howard, D., Best, W., Bruce, C., &Gatehouse, C. (1995). Operativity and animacy effects in aphasic naming.European Journal of Disorders of Communication,30, 286–302.
Howard, D., &Franklin, S. (1988).Missing the meaning? A cognitive neuropsychological study of the processing of words by an aphasic patient. London: MIT Press.
Howard, D., Patterson, K., Franklin, S., Morton, J., &Orchard-Lisle, V. (1984). Variability and consistency in picture naming by aphasie patients. In F. C. Rose (Ed.),Advances in neurology: Vol. 42. Progress in aphasiology (pp. 263–276). New York: Raven.
James, C. T. (1975). The role of semantic information in lexical decisions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,1, 130–136.
Jones, G. V. (1985). Deep dyslexia, imageability and ease of predication.Brain & Language,24, 1–19.
Kay, J., &Ellis, A. W. (1987). A cognitive neuropsychological case study of anomia: Implications for psychological models of word retrieval.Brain,110, 613–629.
Klee, H., &Legge, D. (1976). Estimates of concreteness and other indices for 200 transitive verbs.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,2, 497–507.
Lambon Ralph, M. A., Graham, K. S., Ellis, A. W., &Hodges, J. (1998). Naming in semantic dementia: What matters?Neuropsychologia,36, 775–784.
Marcel, A. J., &Patterson, K. (1978). Word recognition and production: Reciprocity in clinical and normal studies. In J. Requin (Ed.),Attention and performance VII. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Masterson, J., &Druks, J. (1998). Description of a set of 164 nouns and 102 verbs matched for printed word frequency, familiarity and age-of-acquisition.Journal of Neurolinguistics,11, 331–354.
Molfese, D. L., Burger-Judisch, L. M., Gill, L. A., Golinkoff, R. M., &Hirsch-Pasek, K. A. (1996). Electrophy siological correlates of noun-verb processing in adults.Brain & Language,54, 388–413.
Morrison, C. M., Chappell, T. D., &Ellis, A. W. (1997). Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50A, 528–559.
Morrison, C. M., &Ellis, A.W. (1995). The roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 116–133.
Morrison, C. M., Ellis, A. W., &Quinlan, P. T. (1992). Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition.Memory & Cognition,20, 705–714.
Morton, J., &Patterson, K. (1980). “Little words—No!” In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.),Deep dyslexia (pp. 270–285). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Nickels, L., &Howard, D. (1995). Aphasie naming—What matters?Neuropsychologia,33, 1281–1303.
Oldfield, R. C., &Wingfield, A. (1965). Response latencies in naming objects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,17, 273–281.
Orpwood, L., &Warrington, E. K. (1995). Word specific impairments in naming and spelling but not in reading.Cortex,31, 239–265.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., &Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology,76, 1–25.
Plaut, D. C., &Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia—A case study of connectionist neuropsychology.Cognitive Neuropsychology,10, 377–500.
Pulvermüller, F., Mohr, B., Sedat, N., Hadler, B., &Rayman, J. (1996). Word class-specific deficits in Wernicke’s aphasia.Neuro-case,2, 203–212.
Rapp, B., &Caramazza, A. (1998). A case of selective difficulty in writing verbs.Neurocase,4, 127–140.
Richardson, J. T. E. (1975). The effect of word imageability in acquired dyslexia.Neuropsychologia,13, 281–288.
Shallice, T. (1988).From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strain, E., Patterson, K., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1995). Semantic effects in single word naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1140–1154.
ter Keurs, M., Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., &Stegeman, D. F. (1999). Electrophysical manifestations of open- and closed-class words in patients with Broca’s aphasia with agrammatic comprehension.Brain,122, 839–854.
Warburton, E., Wise, R.J.S., Price, C. J., Weiller, C., Hadar, U., Ramsay, S., &Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1996). Noun and verb retrieval by normal subjects: Studies with PET.Brain,119, 159–179.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported in part by ESRC Studentship Award R00429634014 to H.B.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bird, H., Franklin, S. & Howard, D. Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verbs and function words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 33, 73–79 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195349
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195349