Abstract
The geographical slants of hills are known to appear quite exaggerated. Here, we examine the visual and haptic perception of the geographical slant of surfaces within reach under full-cue conditions and show that the perceived orientation of even these surfaces is biased. An exaggeration with respect to deviations from horizontal is shown to be present cross-modally. Experiment 1 employed numerical estimation to show the effect for visually observed surfaces, while controlling for verbal numerical bias. Experiment 2 demonstrated that the bias is present even when manual measures show good calibration. Experiment 3 controlled for direction of gaze. Experiment 4 measured the same bias for haptic surfaces. Experiment 5 showed that the bias can also be observed using the nonnumeric task of angle bisection. These results constrain theories of geographical slant perception and appear most consistent with functional scale expansion of deviations from horizontal.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banks, M. S., Hooge, I. T. C., & Backus, B. T. (2001). Perceiving slant about a horizontal axis from stereopsis. Journal of Vision, 1(2, Art. 1), 55–79. doi:10.1167/1.2.1
Banks, W. P., & Coleman, M. J. (1981). Two subjective scales of number. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 95–105.
Bhalla, M., & Proffitt, R. D. (1999). Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1076–1096.
Bridgeman, B., & Hoover, M. (2008). Processing spatial layout by perception and sensorimotor interaction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 851–859.
Clark, W. C., Smith, A. H., & Rabe, A. (1956). The interaction of surface texture, outline gradient, and ground in the perception of slant. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 10, 1–8.
Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (1998). Two memories for geographical slant: Separation and interdependence of action and awareness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 22–36.
Dick, M., & Hochstein, S. (1989). Visual orientation estimation. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 227–234.
Dunham, D. W., & Schöne, H. (1984). Substrate slope and orientation in land hermit crab, Coenobita clypetus (Decapoda, Coenobitidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 154, 511–513.
Durgin, F. H. (2009). When walking makes perception better. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 43–47.
Durgin, F. H., Baird, J. A., Greenburg, M., Russell, R., Shaughnessy, K., & Waymouth, S. (2009). Who is being deceived? The experimental demands of wearing a backpack. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 964–969.
Durgin, F. H., Fox, L. F., & Kim, D. H. (2003). Not letting the left leg know what the right leg is doing: Limb-specific locomotor adaptation to sensory-cue conflict. Psychological Science, 16, 567–572.
Durgin, F. H., Hajnal, A., Li, Z., Tonge, N., & Stigliani, A. (2010). Palm boards are not action measures: An alternative to the two-systems theory of geographical slant perception. Acta Psychologica, 134, 182–197.
Eby, D. W., & Braunstein, M. L. (1995). The perceptual flattening of three-dimensional scenes enclosed by a frame. Perception, 24, 981–993.
Engebretson, P. H., & Huttenlocher, J. (1996). Bias in spatial location due to categorization: Comment on Tversky and Schiano. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 96–108.
Fisher, G. H. (1968). The frameworks for perceptual localization (Tech. Rep. 70/GEN/9617). Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.: University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
Flock, H. R. (1965). Optical texture and linear perspective as stimuli for slant perception. Psychological Review, 72, 505–514.
Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of visual surfaces. American Journal of Psychology, 63, 367–384.
Gibson, J. J., & Cornsweet, J. (1952). The perceived slant of visual surfaces—optical and geographical. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 11–15.
Gruber, H. E., & Clark, W. C. (1956). Perception of slanted surfaces. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 6, 97–106.
Hajnal, A., Abdul-Malak, D. T., & Durgin, F. H. (in press). The perceptual experience of slope by foot and by finger. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. doi:10.1037/a0019950
Harris, C. S. (1963). Adaptation to displaced vision: Visual, motor, or proprioceptive change? Science, 140, 812–813. doi:10.1126/science.140.3568.812
Harris, C. S. (1980). Insight or out of sight? Two examples of perceptual plasticity in the human adult. In C. S. Harris (Ed.), Visual coding and adaptability (pp. 95–150). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Haun, D., Allen, G., & Wedell, D. (2005). Bias in spatial memory: A categorical endorsement. Acta Psychologica, 188, 149–170.
Howard, I. P., & Kaneko, H. (1994). Relative shear disparities and the perception of surface inclination. Vision Research, 34, 2505–2517.
Howe, C., & Purves, D. (2004). Natural-scene geometry predicts the perception of angles and line orientation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 1228–1233.
Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L., & Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, 352–376.
Kammann, R. (1967). The overestimation of vertical distance and slope and its role in the moon illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 585–589.
Kaneko, H., & Howard, I. P. (1997). Spatial properties of shear disparity processing. Vision Research, 37, 315–323.
Knill, D. C. (1998). Discrimination of planar slant from texture: Human and ideal observers compared. Vision Research, 38, 1683–1711.
Knill, D. C., & Saunders, J. A. (2003). Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant? Vision Research, 43, 2539–2558.
Li, Z., & Durgin, F. H. (2009). Downhill slopes look shallower from the edge. Journal of Vision, 9(11, Art. 6), 1–15. doi:10.1167/9.11.6
Nardi, D., & Bingham, V. P. (2009). Pigeon (Columba livia) encoding of a goal location: The relative importance of shape geometry and slope information. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 123, 204–216.
Norman, J. F., Crabtree, C. E., Bartholomew, A. N., & Ferrell, E. L. (2009). Aging and the perception of slant from optical texture, motion parallax, and binocular disparity. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 116–130.
Ooi, T. L., Wu, B., & He, Z. J. (2006). Perceptual space in the dark affected by the intrinsic bias of the visual system. Perception, 35, 605–624.
O’Shea, R. P., & Ross, H. E. (2007). Judgments of visually perceived eye level (VPEL) in outdoor scenes: Effects of slope and height. Perception, 36, 1168–1178.
Perrone, J. A. (1982). Visual slant underestimation: A general model. Perception, 11, 641–654.
Proffitt, D. R. (2006). Embodied perception and the economy of action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 110–122.
Proffitt, D. R., Bhalla, M., Gossweiler, R., & Midgett, J. (1995). Perceiving geographical slant. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 409–428.
Redding, G. M., & Wallace, B. (1988). Components of prism adaptation in terminal and concurrent exposure: Organization of the eye-hand coordination loop. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 59–68.
Ross, H. E. (1974). Behaviour and perception in strange environments. London: Allen & Unwin.
Sedgwick, H. A. (1986). Space perception. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 21.1–21.57). New York: Wiley.
Simmering, V. R., Spencer, J. P., & Schöner, G. (2006). Reference-related inhibition produces enhanced position discrimination and fast repulsion near axes of symmetry. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 1027–1046.
Spencer, J. P., Simmering, V. R., & Schutte, A. R. (2006). Toward a formal theory of flexible spatial behavior: Geometric category biases generalize across pointing and verbal response types. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 473–490.
Todd, J., Guckes, K., & Egan, E. (2009). The perception of surface slant from monocular texture gradients and binocular disparity [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 9(8), 53a. doi:10.1167/9.8.53
Tversky, B., & Schiano, D. (1989). Perceptual and conceptual factors in distortions in memory for maps and graphs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 387–398.
Wolfe, J. M., Friedman-Hill, S. R., Stewart, M. I., & O’Connell, K. M. (1992). The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 34–49.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Hans Wallach fellowship funds and by a Swarthmore College Faculty Research Grant. Natasha Tonge and Selmaan Chettih assisted with the collection of data.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Durgin, F.H., Li, Z. & Hajnal, A. Slant perception in near space is categorically biased: Evidence for a vertical tendency. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72, 1875–1889 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.7.1875
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.7.1875