Challenging prior evidence for a shared syntactic processor for language and music
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
A theoretical landmark in the growing literature comparing language and music is the shared syntactic integration resource hypothesis (SSIRH; e.g., Patel, 2008), which posits that the successful processing of linguistic and musical materials relies, at least partially, on the mastery of a common syntactic processor. Supporting the SSIRH, Slevc, Rosenberg, and Patel (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16(2):374–381, 2009) recently reported data showing enhanced syntactic garden path effects when the sentences were paired with syntactically unexpected chords, whereas the musical manipulation had no reliable effect on the processing of semantic violations. The present experiment replicated Slevc et al.’s (2009) procedure, except that syntactic garden paths were replaced with semantic garden paths. We observed the very same interactive pattern of results. These findings suggest that the element underpinning interactions is the garden path configuration, rather than the implication of an alleged syntactic module. We suggest that a different amount of attentional resources is recruited to process each type of linguistic manipulations, hence modulating the resources left available for the processing of music and, consequently, the effects of musical violations.
- Koelsch, S., Gunter, T. C., Wittfoth, M., & Sammler, D. (2005). Interaction between syntax processing in language and in music: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(10), 1565–1577. CrossRef
- Loui, P., & Wessel, D. (2007). Harmonic expectation and affect in Western music: Effects of attention and training. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(7), 1084–1092. CrossRef
- Parmentier, F. B. R., Elford, G., Escera, C., Andrés, P., & San Miguel, I. (2008). The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task. Cognition, 106, 408–432. CrossRef
- Patel, A. D. (2003). Language, music, syntax and the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 6(7), 674–681. CrossRef
- Patel, A. D. (2008). Music, language, and the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Peretz, I., Kolinsky, R., Tramo, M., Labrecque, R., Hublet, C., Demeurisse, G., et al. (1994). Functional dissociations following bilateral lesions of auditory cortex. Brain, 117, 1283–1301. CrossRef
- Poulin-Charronnat, B., Bigand, E., Madurell, F., & Peereman, R. (2005). Musical structure modulates semantic priming in vocal music. Cognition, 94(3), B67–B78. CrossRef
- Slevc, L. R., Rosenberg, J. C., & Patel, A. D. (2008). Language, music and modularity: Evidence for shared processing of linguistic and musical syntax. In K. Miyazaki, Y. Hiraga, M. Adachi, Y. Nakajima, & M. Tsuzaki (Eds.), 10th International Conference of Music Perception and Cognition (pp. 598–605). Sapporo, Japan.
- Slevc, L. R., Rosenberg, J. C., & Patel, A. D. (2009). Making psycholinguistics musical: Self-paced reading time evidence for shared processing of linguistic and musical syntax. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 374–381. CrossRef
- Challenging prior evidence for a shared syntactic processor for language and music
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Volume 20, Issue 2 , pp 310-317
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Music cognition
- Language comprehension
- Industry Sectors