The QWERTY Effect: How typing shapes the meanings of words.
The QWERTY keyboard mediates communication for millions of language users. Here, we investigated whether differences in the way words are typed correspond to differences in their meanings. Some words are spelled with more letters on the right side of the keyboard and others with more letters on the left. In three experiments, we tested whether asymmetries in the way people interact with keys on the right and left of the keyboard influence their evaluations of the emotional valence of the words. We found the predicted relationship between emotional valence and QWERTY key position across three languages (English, Spanish, and Dutch). Words with more right-side letters were rated as more positive in valence, on average, than words with more left-side letters: the QWERTY effect. This effect was strongest in new words coined after QWERTY was invented and was also found in pseudowords. Although these data are correlational, the discovery of a similar pattern across languages, which was strongest in neologisms, suggests that the QWERTY keyboard is shaping the meanings of words as people filter language through their fingers. Widespread typing introduces a new mechanism by which semantic changes in language can arise.
- Beilock, S. L., & Holt, L. E. (2007). Embodied preference judgments: Can likeability be driven by the motor system? Psychological Science, 18, 51–57. CrossRef
- Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Stimuli, instruction manual and affective ratings (Tech. rep. C-1). Gainesville: University of Florida, Center for Research in Psychophysiology.
- Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 351–367. CrossRef
- Casasanto, D. (2011). Different bodies, different minds: The body-specificity of language and thought. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 378–383. CrossRef
- David, P. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75, 332–337.
- de Saussure, F. (1966). In C. Bally, A. Sechehaye, & W. Baskin (Eds.), Course in general linguistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Logan, G. D. (2003). Simon-type effects: Chronometric evidence for keypress schemata in typewriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 29, 741–757. CrossRef
- Logan, G. D., & Crump, M. J. C. (2011). In B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 54, pp. 1–27). Burlington: Academic Press.
- Nielsen, F. (2012) A new ANEW: Evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblogs. Manuscript submitted for publication. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.2903
- Ohala, J. (1984). An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 of voice. Phonetica, 41, 1–16. CrossRef
- Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 237–241. CrossRef
- Ping, R., Dhillon, S., & Beilock, S. L. (2009). Reach for what you like: The body’s role in shaping preferences. Emotion Review, 1, 140–150. CrossRef
- Redondo, J., Fraga, I., Padrón, I., & Comesaña, M. (2007). The Spanish adaptation of ANEW (affective norms for English words). Behavioral Research Methods, 39, 600–605. CrossRef
- Riderinkhof, K. R., van den Wildenberg, W., Segalowitz, S., & Carter, C. (2004). Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: The role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning. Brain and Cognition, 56, 129–140. CrossRef
- Rieger, M. (2004). Automatic keypress activation in skilled typing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 555–565. CrossRef
- Van den Bergh, O., Vrana, S., & Eelen, P. (1990). Letters from the heart: Affective categorization of letter combinations in typists and nontypists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1153–1161. CrossRef
- The QWERTY Effect: How typing shapes the meanings of words.
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Volume 19, Issue 3 , pp 499-504
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Motor action
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK
- 2. Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
- 3. Neurobiology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- 4. Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, & Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- 5. Department of Psychology, The New School for Social Research, 80 Fifth Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10011, USA