The hypercorrection effect persists over a week, but high-confidence errors return
People’s knowledge about the world often contains misconceptions that are well-learned and firmly believed. Although such misconceptions seem hard to correct, recent research has demonstrated that errors made with higher confidence are more likely to be corrected with feedback, a finding called the hypercorrection effect. We investigated whether this effect persists over a 1-week delay. Subjects answered general-knowledge questions about science, rated their confidence in each response, and received correct answer feedback. Half of the subjects reanswered the same questions immediately, while the other half reanswered them after a 1-week delay. The hypercorrection effect occurred on both the immediate and delayed final tests, but error correction decreased on the delayed test. When subjects failed to correct an error on the delayed test, they sometimes reproduced the same error from the initial test. Interestingly, high-confidence errors were more likely than low-confidence errors to be reproduced on the delayed test. These findings help to contextualize the hypercorrection effect within the broader memory literature by showing that high-confidence errors are more likely to be corrected, but they are also more likely to be reproduced if the correct answer is forgotten.
- Anderson, M. C., & Neely, J. H. (1996). Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Vol. 10. Memory (2nd ed., pp. 237–313). San Diego: Academic Press.
- Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In A. Healy, S. Kosslyn, & R. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in Honor of William K. Estes, vol. 2 (pp. 35–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Briggs, G. E. (1954). Acquisition, extinction, and recovery functions in retroactive inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 285–293. doi:10.1037/h0060251 CrossRef
- Butler, A. C. (2010). Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1118–1133. CrossRef
- Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2008). Correcting a metacognitive error: Feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 918–928. doi:10.1037/0278-7318.104.22.1688 CrossRef
- Butler, A. C., Zaromb, F., Lyle, K. B., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2009). Using popular films to enhance classroom learning: The good, the bad, and the interesting. Psychological Science, 20, 1161–1168. CrossRef
- Butterfield, B., & Mangels, J. A. (2003). Neural correlates of error detection and correction in a semantic retrieval task. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 793–817. doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00203-9 CrossRef
- Butterfield, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2001). Errors committed with high confidence are hypercorrected. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1491–1494. CrossRef
- Butterfield, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2006). The correction of errors committed with high confidence. Metacognition Learning, 1, 69–84. CrossRef
- Estes, W. K. (1955). Statistical theory of distributional phenomena in learning. Psychological Review, 62, 369–377. doi:10.1037/h0046888 CrossRef
- Fazio, L.K. (2011). Persistence of the hypercorrection effect: Do high-confidence errors remain corrected over a delay? (in press).
- Fazio, L. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2009). Surprising feedback improves later memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 88–92. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.1.88 CrossRef
- Fazio, L. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2010). Correcting false memories. Psychological Science, 21, 801–803. CrossRef
- Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. H. (1954). Measures of association for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 732–764. CrossRef
- Gutman, A. (1979). Misconceptions of psychology and performance in the introductory course. Teaching of Psychology, 6, 159–161. CrossRef
- Hammer, D. (1996). More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research. American Journal of Physics, 64, 1316–1325. CrossRef
- Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112. CrossRef
- Kowalski, P., & Taylor, A. K. (2009). The effect of refuting misconceptions in the introductory psychology class. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 153–159. CrossRef
- Kulhavy, R. W., & Anderson, R. C. (1972). Delay-retention effect with multiple-choice tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 505–512. CrossRef
- Kulhavy, R. W., Yekovich, F. R., & Dyer, J. W. (1976). Feedback and response confidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 522–528. CrossRef
- Marsh, E. J., & Fazio, L. K. (2007). Learning from fictional sources. In J. Nairne (Ed.), The foundations of remembering: Essays in honor of Henry L. Roediger III (pp. 397–413). New York: Psychology Press.
- Peeck, J., & Tillema, H. H. (1979). Delay of feedback and retention of correct and incorrect responses. The Journal of Experimental Education, 47, 171–178.
- Postman, L. (1976). Interference theory revisited. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recall and recognition (pp. 157–181). New York: Wiley.
- Roediger, H. L., III, & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 20–27. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003 CrossRef
- Roediger, H. L., III, & Marsh, E. J. (2005). The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1155–1159. doi:10.1037/0278-7322.214.171.1245 CrossRef
- Russell, W. A., & Storms, L. H. (1955). Implicit verbal chaining in paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 287–293. CrossRef
- Schneps, M. (1989). A private universe [Video]. Santa Monica, CA: Pyramid.
- Schwarz, N., Sanna, L. J., Skurnik, I., & Yoon, C. (2007). Metacognitive experiences and the intricacies of setting people straight: Implications for debiasing and public information campaigns. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 39 (pp. 127–161). San Diego: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39003-X
- Shute, V. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189. CrossRef
- The hypercorrection effect persists over a week, but high-confidence errors return
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Volume 18, Issue 6 , pp 1238-1244
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Cued recall
- Industry Sectors