Can expectancies produce placebo effects for implicit learning?
The placebo effect is an important phenomenon whereby real changes occur in response to an otherwise inert intervention. Despite increasing research attention, it remains unclear exactly which processes are amenable to placebo effects. The current study tested whether an instructional manipulation could produce placebo effects on a nonconscious cognitive task, namely implicit learning. Four hundred and sixty-four university students completed a visual search task while smelling an odor or no odor, in alternating blocks. Unknown to them, the task contained a contingency whereby on half the trials the target’s location was cued by the pattern of distractors, which was achieved by repeating some configurations of targets and distractors. Prior to the task, participants received positive, negative, or no information about the odor’s possible effects on performance. Those given positive information demonstrated faster reaction times on cued trials than other participants. Those given negative information showed slower reaction times on cued trials compared with participants given no information. Further, the cuing effect appeared to be nonconscious, with participants’ ability to recognize the repeated configurations equivalent to chance and no evidence that performance on a recognition test was related to the magnitude of the cuing effect. This suggests that instructional manipulations can produce placebo effects on some nonconscious processes.
- Beecher, H. K. (1959). The powerful placebo. Journal of the American Medical Association, 159, 1602–1606.
- Benedetti, F., Pollo, A., Lopiano, L., Lanotte, M., Vighetti, S., & Rainero, I. (2003). Conscious expectation and unconscious conditioning in analgesic, motor, and hormonal placebo/nocebo responses. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 4315–4323.
- Brody, H., & Brody, D. (2000). Three perspectives on the placebo response: Expectancy, conditioning, and meaning. Advances in Mind-Body Medicine, 16, 216–232.
- Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cuing: Implit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28–71. CrossRef
- Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (2003). Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 224–234. CrossRef
- Chun, M. M., & Phelps, E. A. (2001). Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 844–847.
- Colagiuri, B., & Boakes, R. A. (2010). Perceived treatment, feedback, and placebo effects in double-blind RCTs: An experimental analysis. Psychopharmacology, 208, 433–441. CrossRef
- Colloca, L., & Benedetti, F. (2006). How prior experience shapes placebo analgesia. Pain, 124, 126–133. CrossRef
- Di Blasi, Z., Harkness, E., Ernst, E., Georgiou, A., & Kleijnen, J. (2001). Influence of context effects on health outcomes: A systematic review. [Meta-Analysis
- Eden, D., & Zuk, Y. (1995). Seasickness as a self-fulfilling prophecy: Raising self-efficacy to boost performance at sea. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 628–635. CrossRef
- Evans, D. (2003). Placebo: The Belief Effect. London: Harper Collins.
- Fillmore, M. T., Carscadden, J. L., & Vogel-Sprott, M. (1998). Alcohol, cognitive impairment and expectancies. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 59, 174–179.
- Herrnstein, R. (1962). Placebo effect in the rat. Science, 138, 677–678. CrossRef
- Howard, J. H., Dennis, N. A., Howard, D. V., Yankovich, H., & Vaidya, C. J. (2004). Implicit spatial contextual learning in healthy aging. Neuropsychology, 18, 124–134.
- Jiménez, L., & Vázquez, G. A. (2010). Implicit sequence learning and contextual cuing do not compete for central cognitive resources. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. Epub ahead of print, 23rd August 2010.
- Kaptchuk, T. J., Stason, W. B., Davis, R. B., Legedza, A. R. T., Schnyer, R. N., Kerr, C. E., et al. (2006). Sham device v inert pill: Randomised controlled trial of two placebo treatments. British Medical Journal, 332, 391–397. CrossRef
- Kienle, G. S., & Kiene, H. (1997). The powerful placebo effect: Fact of fiction? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50, 1311–1318. CrossRef
- Kirsch, I. (1985). Response expectancy as a determinant of experience and behaviour. The American Psychologist, 40, 1189–1202. CrossRef
- Kirsch, I. (1997). Specifying nonspecifics: Physiological mechanisms of placebo effects. In A. Harrington (Ed.), The Placebo Effect: An Interdisciplinary Exploration (pp. 166–186). Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
- Kirsch, I. (1999). How Expectancies Shape Experience. Washington: American Psychological Association. CrossRef
- Lovibond, P. F., & Shanks, D. R. (2002). The role of awareness in pavlovian conditioning: Empricial evidence and theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 3–26.
- Manns, J. R., & Squire, L. R. (2001). Perceptual learning, awareness, and the hippocampus. Hippocampus, 11, 776–782
- Moerman, D. E. P., & Jonas, W. B. M. D. (2002). Deconstructing the Placebo Effect and Finding the Meaning Response. Annals of Internal Medicine, 136, 471–476.
- Preston, A. R., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2008). Dissociation between explicit memory and configural memory in the human medial temporal lobe. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 2192–2207.
- Rausei, V., Makovski, T., & Jiang, Y. V. (2007). Attention dependency in implicit learning of repeated search context. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1321–1328.
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.]. Lancet, 357, 757-762.
- Shapiro, A. K., & Shapiro, E. (1997). The Powerful Placebo: From Ancient Priest to Modern Physician. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
- Smyth, A. C., & Shanks, D. R. (2008). Awareness in contextual cuing with extended and concurrent explicit tests. Memory & Cognition, 36, 403–415.
- Stewart-Williams, S., & Podd, J. (2004). The placebo effect: Dissolving the expectancy versus conditioning debate. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 324–340. CrossRef
- Vaidya, C. J., Huger, M., Howard, D. V., & Howard, J. H. (2007). Developmental differences in implicit learning of spatial context. Neuropsychology, 21, 497–506.
- Wickramasekera, I. (1980). A conditioned response model of the placebo effect: Predictions from the model. Biofeedback and Self Regulation, 5, 5–18. CrossRef
- Can expectancies produce placebo effects for implicit learning?
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Volume 18, Issue 2 , pp 399-405
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Placebo effect
- Implicit learning
- Contextual cuing
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- 2. Centre for Complementary Medicine Research, University of Western Sydney, Campbelltown Building 5 Locked Bag 1797 Penrith South DC, NSW, 1797, Sydney, Australia