February 2013, Volume 75, Issue 2, pp 349-357,
Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Date: 14 Nov 2012
The perceived onset position of a moving target: Effects of trial contexts are evoked by different attentional allocations
Previous studies have shown that the localization of the perceived onset position of a moving target varies with the trial context. When the moving target appeared at predictable positions to the left or right of fixation (constant context), localization judgments of the perceived onset positions were essentially displaced in motion direction (Fröhlich effect). In contrast, when the target appeared at unpredictable positions in the visual field (random context), localization judgments were at least drastically reduced. Four explanations of this influence of trial context on localization judgments were examined in three experiments. Findings ruled out an overcompensation mechanism effective in random-context conditions, a predictive mechanism effective in constant-context conditions and a detrimental mechanism originating from more trial repetitions in constant-context conditions. Instead, the results indicated that different attentional allocations are responsible for the localization differences. They also demonstrated that attentional mechanisms are at the basis of the Fröhlich effect.
Ansorge, U., Carbone, E., Becker, S. I., & Turatto, M. (2010). Attentional capture by motion onset is spatially imprecise. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 62–105.CrossRef
Brouwer, A. M., Brenner, E., & Smeets, J. B. J. (2002). Perception of acceleration with short presentation times: Can acceleration be used in interception? Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1160–1168.CrossRef
Cornelissen, F. W., Peters, E., & Palmer, J. (2002). The Eyelink Toolbox: Eye tracking with MATLAB and the Psychophysics Toolbox. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 613–617.CrossRef
Fröhlich, F. W. (1923). Über die Messung der Empfindungszeit (Measuring the time of sensation). Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie, 54, 58–78.
Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95–112.CrossRef
Hubbard, T. L., & Ruppel, S. E. (2011). Effects of spatial cuing on the onset repulsion effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 2236–2248.CrossRef
Jancke, D., & Erlhagen, W. (2010). Bridging the gap: A model of common neural mechanisms underlying the Fröhlich effect, the flash-lag effect, and the representational momentum effect. In R. Nijhawan & B. Khurana (Eds.), Space and Time in Perception and Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Jancke, D., Erlhagen, W., Dinse, H., Akhavan, A., Giese, M., Steinhage, A., et al. (1999). Parametric population representation of retinal location: Neuronal interaction dynamics in cat primary visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 9016–9028.PubMed
Kerzel, D. (2010). The Fröhlich effect: Historical notes and relation to the flash-lag, current theories and reconciliation with the onset repulsion effect. In R. Nijhawan & B. Khurana (Eds.), Space and Time in Perception and Action (pp. 321–337). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Kirschfeld, K., & Kammer, T. (1999). The Fröhlich effect: a consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast. Vision Research, 39(22), 3702–3709.
Lupiàñez, J. (2010). Inhibition of return. In A. C. Nobre & J. T. Coull (Eds.), Attention and time (pp. 17–34). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Müsseler, J., & Aschersleben, G. (1998). Localizing the first position of a moving stimulus: The Fröhlich effect and an attention-shifting explanation. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 60(4), 683–695.CrossRef
Müsseler, J., Brinkmeier, E., & Stork, S. (2004). The trial context and the perceived onset position of moving stimuli. In U. Ilg, H. Bülthoff, & H. Mallot (Eds.), Dynamic Perception (pp. 119–124). Sankt Augustin, Germany: Infix.
Müsseler, J., & Kerzel, D. (2004). The trial context determines adjusted localization of stimuli: Reconciling the Fröhlich and Onset Repulsion Effects. Vision Research, 44(19), 2201–2206.PubMed
Nijhawan, R. (2008). Visual prediction: Psychophysics and neurophysiology of compensation for time delays. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 179–239.PubMed
Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance ((pp, Vol. X, pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tsal, Y., & Bareket, T. (1999). Effects of attention on localization of stimuli in the visual field. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(2), 292–296.
Tsal, Y., & Bareket, T. (2005). Localization judgments under various levels of attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 559–566.CrossRef
Tsal, Y., Meiran, N., & Lamy, D. (1995). Towards a resolution theory of visual attention. Visual Cognition, 2, 313–330.CrossRef
Wright, J. M., Morris, A. P., & Krekelberg, B. (2011). Weighted integration of visual position information. Journal of Vision, 11, 1–16.
- The perceived onset position of a moving target: Effects of trial contexts are evoked by different attentional allocations
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
Volume 75, Issue 2 , pp 349-357
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Space perception
- Position judgments
- Onset position
- Moving stimuli
- Fröhlich effect
- Industry Sectors