Value associations of irrelevant stimuli modify rapid visual orienting
In familiar environments, goal-directed visual behavior is often performed in the presence of objects with strong, but task-irrelevant, reward or punishment associations that are acquired through prior, unrelated experience. In a two-phase experiment, we asked whether such stimuli could affect speeded visual orienting in a classic visual orienting paradigm. First, participants learned to associate faces with monetary gains, losses, or no outcomes. These faces then served as brief, peripheral, uninformative cues in an explicitly unrewarded, unpunished, speeded, target localization task. Cues preceded targets by either 100 or 1,500 msec and appeared at either the same or a different location. Regardless of interval, reward-associated cues slowed responding at cued locations, as compared with equally familiar punishment-associated or no-value cues, and had no effect when targets were presented at uncued locations. This localized effect of reward-associated cues is consistent with adaptive models of inhibition of return and suggests rapid, low-level effects of motivation on visual processing.
- Armony, J. L., & Dolan, R. J. (2002). Modulation of spatial attention by fear-conditioned stimuli: An event-related fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 40, 817–826. CrossRef
- Bendiksby, M. S., & Platt, M. L. (2006). Neural correlates of reward and attention in macaque area LIP. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2411–2420. CrossRef
- Bradley, B. P., Field, M., Healy, H., & Mogg, K. (2008). Do the af fective properties of smoking-related cues influence attentional and approach biases in cigarette smokers? Journal of Psychopharmacology, 22, 737–745. CrossRef
- Bruce, G., & Jones, B. T. (2006). Methods, measures, and findings of attentional bias in substance use, abuse, and dependence. In R. W. Wiers & A. W. Stacy (Eds.), Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction (pp. 135–149). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Dorris, M. C., Klein, R. M., Everling, S., & Munoz, D. P. (2002). Contribution of the primate superior colliculus to inhibition of return. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1256–1263. CrossRef
- Dukewich, K. R. (2009). Reconceptualizing inhibition of return as habituation of the orienting response. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 238–251. CrossRef
- Engelmann, J. B., & Pessoa, L. (2007). Motivation sharpens exogenous spatial attention. Emotion, 7, 668–674. CrossRef
- Fox, E., Russo, R., & Dutton, K. (2002). Attentional bias for threat: Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces. Cognition & Emotion, 16, 355–379. CrossRef
- Kahn, I., Yeshurun, Y., Rotshtein, P., Fried, I., Ben-Bashat, D., & Hendler, T. (2002). The role of the amygdala in signaling prospective outcome of choice. Neuron, 33, 983–994. CrossRef
- Kiss, M., Driver, J., & Eimer, M. (2009). Reward priority of visual target singletons modulates event-related potential signatures of attentional selection. Psychological Science, 20, 245–251. CrossRef
- Lange, W.-G., Heuer, K., Reinecke, A., Becker, E. S., & Rinck, M. (2008). Inhibition of return is unimpressed by emotional cues. Cognition & Emotion, 22, 1433–1456. CrossRef
- Lehky, S. R., & Sereno, A. B. (2007). Comparison of shape encoding in primate dorsal and ventral visual pathways. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97, 307–319. CrossRef
- O'Doherty, J. P. (2004). Reward representations and reward-related learning in the human brain: Insights from neuroimaging. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 769–776. CrossRef
- Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. A. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In IH. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–554). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211–228. CrossRef
- Prime, D. J., & Ward, L. M. (2004). Inhibition of return from stimulus to response. Psychological Science, 15, 272–276. CrossRef
- Raymond, J. E., & O'Brien, J. L. (2009). Selective visual attention and motivation: The consequences of value learning in an attentional blink task. Psychological Science, 20, 981–988. CrossRef
- Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (1993). The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Reviews, 18, 247–291. CrossRef
- Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh: Psychological Software Tools.
- Sereno, A. B., Lehky, S. R. Patel, S. S., & Peng, X. (2010). A neurophysiologicalc correlate and model of reflexive spatial attention. In N. Srinivasan, B. R. Kar, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Advances in cognitive science (Vol. 2, pp. 104–131). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Small, D. M., Gitelman, D., Simmons, K., Bloise, S. M., Parrish, T., & Mesulam, M.-M. (2005). Monetary incentives enhance processing in brain regions mediating top-down control of attention. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1855–1865. CrossRef
- Stolarova, M., Keil, A., & Moratti, S. (2006). Modulation of the C1 visual event-related component by conditioned stimuli: Evidence for sensory plasticity in early affective perception. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 876–887. CrossRef
- Stoyanova, R. S., Pratt, J., & Anderson, A. K. (2007). Inhibition of return to social signals of fear. Emotion, 7, 49–56. CrossRef
- Value associations of irrelevant stimuli modify rapid visual orienting
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Volume 17, Issue 4 , pp 536-542
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links