Perceptual expertise enhances the resolution but not the number of representations in working memory
Despite its central role in cognition, capacity in visual working memory is restricted to about three or four items. Curby and Gauthier (2007) examined whether perceptual expertise can help to overcome this limit by enabling more efficient coding of visual information. In line with this, they observed higher capacity estimates for upright than for inverted faces, suggesting that perceptual expertise enhances visual working memory. In the present work, we examined whether the improved capacity estimates for upright faces indicates an increased number of “slots” in working memory, or improved resolution within the existing slots. Our results suggest that perceptual expertise enhances the resolution but not the number of representations that can be held in working memory. These results clarify the effects of perceptual expertise in working memory and support recent suggestions that number and resolution represent distinct facets of working memory ability.
- Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). The capacity of visual shortterm memory is set both by visual information load and number of objects. Psychological Science, 15, 106–111. CrossRef
- Anderson, J. R. (1993). Problem solving and learning. American Psychologist, 48, 35–44. CrossRef
- Awh, E., Barton, B., & Vogel, E. (2007). Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items, regardless of complexity. Psychological Science, 18, 622–628. CrossRef
- Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185. CrossRef
- Cowan, N., Elliott, E. M., Saults, J. S., Morey, C. C., Mattox, S. M., Hismjatullina, A., & Conway, A. R. A. (2005). On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 42–100. CrossRef
- Curby, K. M., & Gauthier, I. (2007). A visual short-term memory advantage for faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 620–628.
- Eng, H. Y., Chen, D., & Jiang, Y. (2005). Visual working memory for simple and complex stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1127–1133.
- Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. J. (2002). Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: Bridging brain activity and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 431–446. CrossRef
- Gobet, F., Lane, P. C., Croker, S., Cheng, P. C., Jones, G., Oliver, I., & Pine, J. M. (2001). Chunking mechanisms in human learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 236–243. CrossRef
- Humphreys, G. W., Hodsoll, J., & Campbell, C. (2005). Attending but not seeing: The “other race” effect in face and person perception studied through change blindness. Visual Cognition, 12, 249–262. CrossRef
- Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281. CrossRef
- Meyer, D., & Kieras, D. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3–65. CrossRef
- Moore, C. D., Cohen, M. X., & Ranganath, C. (2006). Neural mechanisms of expert skills in visual working memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 11187–11196. CrossRef
- Olsson, H., & Poom, L. (2005). Visual memory needs categories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 8776–8780. CrossRef
- Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 369–378.
- Rhodes, G., Hayward, W. G., & Winkler, C. (2006). Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 499–505. CrossRef
- Simons, D. J. (1996). In sight, out of mind: When object representations fail. Psychological Science, 7, 301–305. CrossRef
- Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 261–267. CrossRef
- Tanaka, J. W., & Taylor, M. (1991). Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? Cognitive Psychology, 23, 457–482. CrossRef
- Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161–204.
- Vogel, E. K., Woodman, J., & Luck., S. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 92–114. CrossRef
- Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141–145. CrossRef
- Perceptual expertise enhances the resolution but not the number of representations in working memory
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Volume 15, Issue 1 , pp 215-222
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links