Abstract
One would expect that a lifetime of experience recognizing letters would have an important influence on the visual system. Surprisingly, there is limited evidence of a specific neural response to letters over visual control stimuli. We measured brain activation during a sequential matching task using isolated characters (Roman letters, digits, and Chinese characters) and strings of characters. We localized the visual word form area (VWFA) by contrasting the response to pseudowords against that for letter strings, but this region did not show any other sign of visual specialization for letters. In addition, a left fusiform area posterior to the VWFA was selective for letter strings, whereas a more anterior left fusiform region showed selectivity for single letters. The results of different analyses using both large regions of interest and inspections of individual patterns of response reveal a dissociation between selectivity for letter strings and selectivity for single letters. The results suggest that reading experience fine-tunes visual representations at different levels of processing. An important conclusion is that the processing of nonpronounceable letter strings cannot be assumed to be equivalent to single-letter perception.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baron, J., & Thurstone, I. (1973). An analysis of the word-superiority effect. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 207–228.
Black, S. E., & Behrmann, M. (1994). Localization in alexia. In A. Kertesz (Ed.), Localization and neuroimaging in neuropsychology (pp. 331–376). New York: Academic Press.
Bookheimer, S. (2002). Functional MRI of language: New approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 151–188.
Booth, J. R., Burman, D. D., Meyer, J. R., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., & Mesulam, M. M. (2002). Modality independence of word comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 16, 251–261.
Boynton, G. M., Engel, S. A., Glover, G. H., & Heeger, D. J. (1996). Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 4207–4221.
Cattell, J. M. (1886). The time taken up by cerebral operations. Mind, 11, 220–242.
Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Specialization within the ventral stream: The case for the visual word form area. NeuroImage, 22, 466–476.
Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Lehericy, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Henaff, M. A., & Michel, F. (2000). The visual word form area: Spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain, 123, 291–307.
Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., Naccache, L., Ciuciu, P., Poline, J. B., Le Bihan, D., & Cohen, L. (2004). Letter binding and invariant recognition of masked words: Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. Psychological Science, 15, 307–313.
Dehaene, S., Le Clec’H, G., Poline, J. B., Le Bihan, D., & Cohen, L. (2002). The visual word form area: A prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus. NeuroReport, 13, 321–325.
Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Cohen, L., Le Bihan, D., Mangin, J. F., Poline, J. B., & Riviere, D. (2001). Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 678–680.
Devlin, J. T., Moore, C. J., Mummery, C. J., Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Phillips, J. A., Noppeney, U., et al. (2002). Anatomic constraints on cognitive theories of category specificity. NeuroImage, 15, 675–685.
Downing, P. E., Jiang, Y., Shuman, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2001). A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science, 293, 2470–2473.
Epstein, R., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature, 392, 598–601.
Farah, M. J. (1990). Visual agnosia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Flowers, D. L., Jones, K., Noble, K., VanMeter, J., Zeffiro, T. A., Wood, F. B., & Eden, G. F. (2004). Attention to single letters activates left extrastriate cortex. NeuroImage, 21, 829–839.
Frackowiak, R., Friston, K., Frith, C., Dolan, R., & Mazziotta, J. C. (1997). Human brain function. New York: Academic Press.
Gabrieli, J. D. E., Poldrack, R. A., & Desmond, J. E. (1998). The role of left prefrontal cortex in language and memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 906–913.
Garrett, A. S., Flowers, D. L., Absher, J. R., Fahey, F. H., Gage, H. D., Keyes, J. W., et al. (2000). Cortical activity related to accuracy of letter recognition. NeuroImage, 11, 111–123.
Gauthier, I. (2000). What constrains the organization of the ventral temporal cortex? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 1–2.
Gauthier, I., & Logothetis, N. (2000). Is face recognition not so unique after all? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 125–142.
Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Anderson, A.W., Skudlarski, P., & Gore, J. C. (1999). Activation of the middle fusiform “face area” increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 568–573.
Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Moylan, J., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000). The fusiform “face area” is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 495–504.
Gauthier, I., Wong, A. C.-N., Hayward, W. G., & Cheung, S.-C. (2004). Font tuning associated with expertise in letter perception. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Genovese, C. R., Lazar, N. A., & Nichols, T. (2002). Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. NeuroImage, 15, 870–878.
Grill-Spector, K. (2003). The neural basis of object perception. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 159–166.
Grill-Spector, K., Kushnir, T., Edelman, S., Avidan, G., Itzchak, Y., & Malach, R. (1999). Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron, 24, 187–203.
Hagoort, P., Indefrey, P., Brown, C., Herzog, H., Steinmetz, H., & Seitz, R. J. (1999). The neural circuitry involved in the reading of German words and pseudowords: A PET study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 383–398.
Hasson, U., Levy, I., Behrmann, M., Hendler, T., & Malach, R. (2002). Eccentricity bias as an organizing principle for human highorder object areas. Neuron, 34, 479–490.
Ishai, A., Ungerleider, L. G., Martin, A., Schouten, J. L., & Haxby, J. (1999). Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 9379–9384.
James, K. H., & Gauthier, I. (2005). Neural specialization for letters: Effects of writing, imagining, and perceiving letters. Manuscript in preparation.
James, K. H., Martelli, M., James, T. W., Majaj, N. J., Pelli, D. G., & Gauthier, I. (2004, April–May). fMRI reveals the role of the left fusiform gyrus in letter detection. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL.
Jobard, G., Crivello, F., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2003). Evaluation of the dual route theory of reading: A metanalysis of 35 neuroimaging studies. NeuroImage, 20, 693–712.
Johnston, J. C., & McClelland, J. L. (1974). Perception of letters in words: Seek not and ye shall find. Science, 184, 1192–1194.
Joseph, J. E., Gathers, A. D., & Piper, G. A. (2003). Shared and dissociated cortical regions for object and letter processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 56–67.
Kanwisher, N. (2000). Domain specificity in face perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 759–763.
Kanwisher, N., Chun, M. M., & McDermott, J. (1996). fMRI in individual subjects reveals loci in extrastriate cortex differentially sensitive to faces and objects. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 37, S193.
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302–4311.
Kircher, T. T., Brammer, M., Tous, A. N., Williams, S. C., & McGuire, P. K. (2001). Engagement of right temporal cortex during processing of linguistic context. Neuropsychologia, 39, 798–809.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
Longcamp, M., Anton, J. L., Roth, M., & Velay, J. L. (2003). Visual presentation of single letters activates a premotor area involved in writing. NeuroImage, 19, 1492–1500.
Malach, R., Levy, I., & Hasson, U. (2002). The topography of highorder human object areas. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 176–184.
Malach, R., Reppas, J. B., Benson, R. R., Kwong, K. K., Jiang, H., Kennedy, W. A., et al. (1995). Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92, 8135–8139.
McCandliss, B. D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2003). The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 293–299.
McClelland, J. L. (1977). Letter and configuration information in word identification. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 16, 137–150.
Mewhort, D. J. K. (1974). Accuracy and order of report in tachistoscopic identification. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 28, 383–398.
Monk, A. F., & Hulme, C. (1983). Errors in proofreading: Evidence for the use of word shape in word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 11, 16–23.
Moore, C. J., & Price, C. J. (1999). Three distinct ventral occipitotemporal regions for reading and object naming. NeuroImage, 10, 181–192.
Murtha, S., Chertkow, H., Beauregard, M., & Evans, A. (1999). The neural substrate of picture naming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 399–423.
Ogawa, S., Menon, R. S., Tank, D.W., Kim, S. G., Merkle, H., Ellermann, J. M., & Ugurbil, K. (1993). Functional brain mapping by blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast magnetic resonance imaging: A comparison of signal characteristics with a biophysical model. Biophysiology Journal, 64, 803–812.
Pelli, D. G., Farell, B., & Moore, D. C. (2003). The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition. Nature, 423, 752–756.
Pillsbury, W. B. (1897). A study in apperception. American Journal of Psychology, 8, 315–393.
Polk, T. A., & Farah, M. J. (1995). Brain localization for arbitrary stimulus categories: A simple account based on Hebbian learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92, 12370–12373.
Polk, T. A., & Farah, M. J. (1998). The neural development and organization of letter recognition: Evidence from functional neuroimaging, computational modeling, and behavioral studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 847–852.
Polk, T. A., & Farah, M. J. (2002). Functional MRI evidence for an abstract, not perceptual, word-form area. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 65–72.
Polk, T. A., Stallcup, M., Aguirre, G. K., Alsop, D. C., D’Esposito, M., Detre, J. A., & Farah, M. J. (2002). Neural specialization for letter recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 145–159.
Price, C. J. (2000). The anatomy of language: Contributions from functional neuroimaging. Journal of Anatomy, 197, 335–359.
Price, C. J., & Devlin, J. T. (2003). The myth of the visual word form area. NeuroImage, 19, 473–481.
Puce, A., Allison, T., Asgari, M., Gore, J. C., & McCarthy, G. (1996). Differential sensitivity of human visual cortex to faces, letterstrings, and textures: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 5205–5215.
Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. E., Jenner, A. R., Katz, L., Frost, S. J., Lee, J. R., et al. (2001). Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34, 479–492.
Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 274–280.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439.
Rossion, B., Gauthier, I., Goffaux, V., Tarr, M. J., & Crommelinck, M. (2002). Expertise training with novel objects leads to left lateralized face-like electrophysiological responses. Psychological Science, 13, 250–257.
Sanocki, T., Bowyer, K.W., Heath, M. D., & Sarkar, S. (1998). Are edges sufficient for object recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 340–349.
Tagamets, M. A., Novick, J. M., Chalmers, M. L., & Friedman, R. B. (2000). A parametric approach to orthographic processing in the brain: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 281–297.
Tarkiainen, A., Helenius, P., Hansen, P. C., Cornelissen, P. L., & Salmelin, R. (1999). Dynamics of letter string perception in the human occipitotemporal cortex. Brain, 122, 2119–2131.
van Leeuwen, C., & Lachmann, T. (2004). Negative and positive congruence effects in letters and shapes. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 908–925.
Wheeler, D. D. (1970). Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 59–85.
Wong, A. C.-N., & Gauthier, I. (2002). Visual expertise with different alphabet systems. Unpublished manuscript.
Wong, A. C.-N., Gauthier, I., Woroch, B., DeBuse, C., & Curran, T. (2005). An early electrophysiological response associated with expertise in letter perception. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 306–318.
Wong, A. C.-N., Jobard, G., James, T. W., James, K. H., & Gauthier, I. (2005). Expertise with characters in alphabetic and nonalphabetic writing systems engage the same occipitotemporal area. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NEI Grant R01-EY13441 to I.G. and a grant from the James S. McDonnell Foundation to the Perceptual Expertise Network.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
James, K.H., James, T.W., Jobard, G. et al. Letter processing in the visual system: Different activation patterns for single letters and strings. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 5, 452–466 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.5.4.452
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.5.4.452