Signal recognition as influenced by presentation schedules
Performance in a recognition task involving two amplitudes of the same tone was investigaled over a wide range of presentation schedules. The task was arranged so that there was no trial-to-trial feedback or other information regarding the relative frequencies of the two tones. The hit and false alarm rates (the proportion of “loud” responses to loud and soft stimuli, respectively) on any given trial were strongly influenced by the stimulus and response on the preceding trial. In general, Ss tended to repeat the last response and were more accurate after a stimulus alternation than after a stimulus repetition. In addition, hit and false alarm rates were inversely related to the presentation probability of the loud tone, in contrast to the direct relation typically found in signal detection experiments and in recognition experiments with trial-to-trial feedback. A mathematical model incorporating three processes (memory, comparison, and decision) was shown to give a good account of these data.
- Atkinson, R. C., &Kinchla, R. A. A learning model for forcedchoice detection experiments. Brit. J. math. statist. Psychol., 1965, 18, 183–206.
- Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley, 1966.
- Helson, H. Adaptation-level theory. In S. Koch (Ed.),Psychology: A study of a science. New York: McGraw-Hill, Vol. 1, 1959. Pp. 565–621.
- Halier, R. W., & Atkinson, R. C. A memory-detection model for signal recognition. Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University, Tech. Rep., 110, 1967.
- Kinchla, R. A. A comparison of sequential effects in detection and recognition. Experimental Psychology Series, Psychology Department, New York University, Tech. Rep., 1, 1966.
- Kinchla, R. A., &Smyzer, F. A diffusion model of perceptual memory. Percept. & Psychophys., 1967, 2, 219–229.
- Luce, R. O. Detection and recognition. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, and E. Galanter (Eds.),Handbook of mathematical psychology. New York: Wiley, 1963a. Pp. 103–189.
- Luce, R. D. A threshold theory for simple detection experiments. Psychol. Rev., 1963b, 70, 61–79. CrossRef
- Parducci, A., &Sandusky, A. Distribution and sequence effects in judgment. J. exp. Psychol., 1965, 69, 450–459. CrossRef
- Swets, J. A., Tanner, W. P., Jr., &Birdsall, T. G. Decision pro-cesses in perception. Psychol. Rev., 1961, 68, 301–340. CrossRef
- Tanner, W. P., Jr. Theory of recognition. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 1956, 28, 882–888. CrossRef
- Signal recognition as influenced by presentation schedules
Perception & Psychophysics
Volume 2, Issue 8 , pp 349-358
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors