Sex differences in the duration of visual attention
Normal adult males and females looked at a series of photographs containing either a single adult male or female. Ss viewed each picture for as long as they wished. Assuming that measures of the duration of attention would reflect Ss attraction for the opposite sex, it was hypothesized that Ss would spend relatively more time viewing photographs of the opposite sex. The results failed to support the hypothesis. Although males did not differentially attend to the stimuli, females looked significantly longer at the females than they did at the males. The results were interpreted in terms of the “overt sexual content” of the stimuli and socially conditioned attentiveness and inattentiveness.
- Bakan, P., &Leckart, B. T. Attention, extraversion, and stimulus-personality congruence.Percept. & Psychophys., 1966, 1, 355–357.
- Berlyne, D. E. Conflict and information-theory variables as determinants of human perceptual curiosity.J. exp. Psychol., 1957, 53, 399–404. CrossRef
- Berlyne, D. E. The influence of complexity and novelty in visual figures on orienting responses.J. exp. Psychol., 1958a, 55, 289–296. CrossRef
- Berlyne, D. E. Supplementary report: Complexity and orienting responses with, longer exposures.J. exp. Psychol., 1958b, 56, 183. CrossRef
- Brandt, H. F. The psychology of seeing. New York: Philosophical Library, 1945.
- Brown, L. T., &Farha, W. Some physical determinants of viewing time under three instructional sets.Percept. & Psychophys., 1966, 1, 2–4. CrossRef
- Bullock, D. H. Note on “looking at pictures” behavior.Percept. mot. Skills, 1959, 9, 333. CrossRef
- Cantor, J. H., &Cantor, G. N. Observing behavior in children as a function of stimulus novelty.Child Develpm., 1964a, 35, 119–128.
- Cantor, J. H., &Cantor, G. N. Children’s observing behavior as related to amount and recency of stimulus familiarization.J. exp. child. Psychol, 1964b, 1, 241–247. CrossRef
- Cantor, G. N., Cantor, J. H., &Ditrichs, R. Observing behavior in preschool children as a function of stimulus complexity.Child Develpm., 1963, 34, 683–689.
- Christiansen, K. C. Response duration as a measure of ambivalent response tendencies.J. Pers., 1961, 29, 115–123. CrossRef
- Leckart, B. T. Looking time: The effects of stimulus complexity and familiarity.Percept. & Psychophys., 1966, 1, 142–144. CrossRef
- Leckart, B. T., &Bakan, P. Complexity judgments of photographs and looking time.Percept, mot. Skills, 1965, 21, 16–18.
- Leckart, B. T., Keeling, K., &Bakan, P. The effect of rate of presentation on free looking time.Percept. & Psychophys., 1966, 1, 107–109. CrossRef
- Martin, B. Expression and inhibition of sex motive arousal in college males.J. abnorm, soc. Psychol., 1964, 68, 307–312. CrossRef
- McReynolds, P. Reactions to novel and familiar stimuli as a function of schizophrenic withdrawal.Percept, mot. Skills, 1963, 16, 847–850.
- Rosenzweig, S. The photoscope as an objective device for evaluating sexual interest.Psychosom. Med., 1942, 4, 150–158.
- Zamansky, H. S. A technique for assessing homosexual tendencies.J. Pers., 1956, 24, 436–448. CrossRef
- Zamansky, H. S. An investigation of the psychoanalytic theory of paranoid delusions.J. Pers., 1958, 26, 410–425. CrossRef
- Sex differences in the duration of visual attention
Perception & Psychophysics
Volume 1, Issue 5 , pp 374-376
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors