Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual material
In order (1) to study the relationship between complexity and preference for slides of the physical environment and (2) to test the hypothesis that the content of slides (in particular, whether nature or urban) will influence preference, independent of the rated complexity, 88 Ss were asked to rate 56 slides, both for preference and for complexity. Based on dimensional analyses, a nature and an urban dimension were identified. Three major results were obtained: (1) Nature scenes were greatly preferred to urban scenes (p < .001). (2) Complexity predicted preference within the nature domain (r = .69) and within the urban domain (r = .78). (3) Complexity did not account for the preference for nature over urban slides; the greatly preferred nature slides were, in fact, judged on the average less complex than the urban slides. The possibility is raised that the domain-specific character of the preference/complexity relationship found in this study may be general; that is, it may not be a special property of environmentally generated arrays.
- BERLYNE, D. E. Complexity and incongruity variables as determinants of exploratory choice and evaluative ratings. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1963, 17, 274–290.
- BRUNER, J. S. On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 1957, 64, 123–152. CrossRef
- BRUNSWIK, E. The conceptual framework. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, 1952, 1, No. 10.
- ITTELSON, W. H. Perception and transactional psychology. In S. Koch (Ed.)Psychology: A study of a science Vol.4. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962. Pp. 660–704.
- KAPLAN, R. The dimensions of the visual environment: Methodological considerations. In W. J. Mitchell (Ed.)Environmental design: Research and practice. Proceedings of the Environmental Design Research Association Conference Three, Los Angeles, 1972.
- KAPLAN, S. The role of location processing in the perception of the environment. In C. M. Eastman and J. Archea (Eds.),Proceedings of the Environmental Design Research Association Two, Pittsburgh, 1970.
- KAPLAN, S. The challenge of environmental psychology: A proposal for a new functionalism. American Psychologist, 1972a, 27, 140–143. CrossRef
- KAPLAN, S. Cognitive maps in perception and thought. In R. M. Downs and D. Stea (Eds.),Cognitive mapping: Images of spatial environments. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, 1972b, in press.
- LINGOES, J. L. An IBM-7090 program for Guttman-Lingoes Smallest Space Analysis-III. Behavioral Science, 1966, 11, 75–76. CrossRef
- LINGOES, J. L. Non-metric factor analysis: A rank-reducing alternative to linear factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1967, 2, 485–505. CrossRef
- VITZ, P. C. Preferences for different amounts of visual complexity. Behavioral Science, 1966, 11, 105–114. CrossRef
- WOHLWILL, J. F. Amount of stimulus exploration and preference as differential functions of stimulus complexity. Perception & Psychophysics, 1968, 4, 307–312.
- WOHLWILL, J. F. The emerging discipline of environmental psychology. American Psychologist, 1970, 25, 303–312. CrossRef
- Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban visual material
Perception & Psychophysics
Volume 12, Issue 4 , pp 354-356
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors