Judged displacement in apparent vertical and horizontal motion
The judged vanishing point of a target traveling along a vertical or horizontal trajectory at uniform velocity was examined. In Experiments 1 and 2, subjects indicated the vanishing point by positioning a cross hair. Judged vanishing point was displaced forward in the direction of motion, and the magnitude of the displacement increased with the apparent velocity of the target. Displacement was greater for horizontal than for vertical motion. In Experiment 3, similar patterns were found using a forced-choice paradigm. Experiments 4 and 5 assessed the role of knowledge of the target’s likely behavior. In Experiment 4, the target bounced within the confines of a square frame. Judged vanishing point was displaced in the anticipated direction, even 9 when the anticipated direction was opposite to the current path of motion. Experiment 5 was a control experiment that ruled out the presence of the frame as the sole cause for displacement. The results suggest that displacement from the true vanishing point is due to a high-level cognitive mechanism capable of utilizing knowledge about probable target location.
- Beverley, K. I., &Regan, D. (1979). Separable aftereffects of changing-size and motion-in-depth: Different neural mechanisms.Vision Research,11, 833–840.
- Bharucha, J. J., & Hubbard, T. L. (1988).Anticipated collision along an oblique path: Effects on judged displacement. Manuscript submitted for publication.
- Finke, R. A., &Freyd, J. J. (1985). Transformations of visual memory induced by implied motions of pattern elements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 780–794. CrossRef
- Fodor, J. A. (1983).The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Foster, D.H., &Gravano, S. (1982). Overshoot of curvature in visual apparent motion.Perception & Psychophysics,31, 411–420.
- Freyd, J. J. (1987). Dynamic mental representations.Psychological Review,94, 427–438. CrossRef
- Freyd, J. J., &Finke, R. A. (1984). Representational momentum.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 126–132. CrossRef
- Freyd, J. J., &Finke, R. A. (1985). A velocity effect for representational momentum.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,23, 443–446.
- Freyd, J. J., &Johnson, J. Q. (1987). Probing the time course of representational momentum.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 259–269. CrossRef
- Kelly, M., &Freyd, J. J. (1987). Explorations of representational momentum.Cognitive Psychology,19, 369–401. CrossRef
- Matin, L. (1986). Visual localization and eye movements. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. I. Sensory processes and perception (pp. 20.1–20.45). New York: Wiley.
- Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1981). The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge.Psychological Review,87, 16–45. CrossRef
- Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984).Compulation and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Runeson, S. (1974). Constant velocity-Not perceived as such.Psychological Research,37, 3–23. CrossRef
- Runeson, S. (1975). Visual prediction of collision with natural and nonnatural motion functions.Perception & Psychophysics,18, 261–266. CrossRef
- Shepard, R. N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imaging, thinking, and dreaming.Psychological Review,91, 417–447. CrossRef
- Skavenski, A. A., &Hansen, R. M. (1978). Role of eye position information in visual space perception. In J. W. Senders, D. F. Fisher, & R. A. Monty (Eds.),Eye movements and the higher cognitive functions (pp. 15–34). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Judged displacement in apparent vertical and horizontal motion
Perception & Psychophysics
Volume 44, Issue 3 , pp 211-221
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors