A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number
This paper proposes a probabilistic model of how humans identify the number of dots within a briefly presented visual display. The model is an application of Thurstone’s law of comparative judgment, and it is assumed that the internal representation of numerosity consists of log-spaced random variables. The discrimination between any two different numerosities is consequently described as a function of max/rain, where max and rain are the larger and smaller numbers, respectively. The model was tested in two experiments in which the Weber fraction for numerosity, corresponding with the critical ratio of max and min, was found to have the value of 162. It was concluded that the classical span of subitizing numerosity is but a special case of the span of discrimination.
- Averbach, E. The span of apprehension as a function of exposure duration.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1963,2, 60–64. CrossRef
- Beckwith, M., &Restle, F. Process of enumeration.Psychological Review, 1966,73, 437–444. CrossRef
- Bourdon, B. Sur le temps nécessaire pour nominer les nornbres.Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Etranger, 1908,33, 426–431.
- Crossman, E. R. F. W. The measurement of discriminability.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1956,7, 176–195.
- Fernberger, S. W. A preliminary study of the range of visual apprehension.American Journal of Psychology, 1921,32, 121–133. CrossRef
- Freeman, F. N. Grouped objects as concrete basis for the number idea.Elementary School Teacher, 1912,12, 306–314. CrossRef
- Hunter, W. S., Sigler, M. The span of visual discrimination as a function of time and intensity of stimulation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1940,26, 160–179. CrossRef
- Indow, T., Ida, M. Scaling of dot numerosity.Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,22, 265–276. CrossRef
- Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M. W., Reese, T. W., &Volkman, J. The discrimination of visual number.American Journal of Psychology, 1949,62, 498–525. CrossRef
- Moyer, R. S., &Landauer, T. K. The time required for judgments of numerical inequality.Nature, 1967,215, 1519–1520. CrossRef
- Neisser, U. Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.
- Parducci, A. Range-frequency compromise in judgment.Psychological Monographs, 1963,77 (2, Whole No. 565).
- Taves, E. H. Two mechanisms for the perception of visual numerousness.Archives of Psychology, 1941, No. 265.
- Thurstone, L. L. A law of comparative judgment.Psychological Review, 1927,34, 273–286. CrossRef
- Thurstone, L. L. Fechner’s law and the method of equalappearing intervals.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1929,12, 214–224. CrossRef
- Torgerson, W. S. Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley, 1958.
- Woodworth, R. S., &Schlosberg, H. Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1954.
- A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number
Perception & Psychophysics
Volume 32, Issue 2 , pp 163-170
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors