The role of learning in remembered duration
In two experiments, the effects of learning on both the accuracy and bias of duration judgments were examined. In Experiment 1, subjects learned one of two tasks (i.e., using a computer software package, building a model car), containing a varying number of action steps, over a one-, three-, or five-trial period. Retrospective judgments of a task’s total duration revealed that accuracy was high at intermediate stages of learning but was low at early stages due to an overestimation bias and low at later stages due to an underestimation bias. The number of action steps within a task influenced behavior only at early learning stages where more action steps led to significantly longer duration estimates. Experiment 2 acted as a converging operation in which novice and experienced pianists were asked to estimate, in advance, how long they thought it would take them to play melodies that varied in their degree of familiarity (i.e. recently learned, well learned, extremely well learned). When these estimates were compared with the melodies’ actual playing times, results revealed a similar pattern of accuracy and bias as found in Experiment 1. These findings are discussed in terms of a “structural remembering model” that emphasizes the role of event predictability in time estimation behavior.
- Adams, J. K., &Adams, P. A. (1961). Realism of confidence judgments.Psychological Review,68, 33–45. CrossRef
- Block, R. A. (1985). Contextual coding in memory: Studies of remembered duration. In J. Michon & J. Jackson (Eds.),Time, action, and behavior (pp. 169–178). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
- Block, R. A. (1989). Experiencing and remembering time: Affordances, context, and cognition. In I. Levin & D. Zakay (Eds.),Time and human cognition: A life-span perspective (pp. 333–363). Amsterdam: North-Holland. CrossRef
- Block, R. A., &Zakay, D. (1997). Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 184–197. CrossRef
- Boltz, M. G. (1992). The remembering of auditory event durations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 938–956. CrossRef
- Boltz, M. G. (1994). Changes in internal tempo and effects on the learning and remembering of event durations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1154–1171. CrossRef
- Boltz, M. G. (1995). Effects of event structure on retrospective duration judgments.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 1080–1096.
- Boltz, M. G. (1998a). The processing of temporal and nontemporal information in the remembering of event durations and musical structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1087–1104. CrossRef
- Boltz, M. G. (1998b). Task predictability and remembered duration.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 768–784. CrossRef
- Brown, S. W. (1985). Time perception and attention: The effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived duration.Perception & Psychophysics,38, 115–124. CrossRef
- Burt, C. D. B., &Kemp, S. (1994). Construction of activity duration and time management potential.Applied Cognitive Psychology,8, 155–168. CrossRef
- de Groot, A. (1966). Perception and memory versus thought: Some old ideas and recent findings. In B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.),Problem solving (pp. 19–50). New York: Wiley.
- Egan, D. E., &Schwartz, B. J. (1979). Chunking in recall of symbolic drawings.Memory & Cognition,7, 149–158. CrossRef
- Fraisse, P. (1971). L’apprentissage de l’estimation de la durée et ses repères.Année Psychologie,71, 371–379. CrossRef
- Fraisse, P., &Orsini, F. (1958). Étude expérimentale de conduites temporelles III: Étude génétique de l’estimation de la durée [Experimental study of temporal behavior III: A study of duration estimation].Année Psychologique,58, 1–6. CrossRef
- Kahneman, D. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Loehlin, J. C. (1959). The influence of different activities on the apparent length of time.Psychological Monographs,73, (4, Whole No. 474).
- Miller, G. W., Hicks, R. E., &Willette, M. (1978). Effects of concurrent verbal rehearsal and temporal set upon judgments of temporal duration.Acta Psychologica,42, 173–179. CrossRef
- Mohan, V. (1975). The influence of stimulus modality, duration, and knowledge of results on improvement in temporal estimation.Manas,22, 159–167.
- Montare, A. (1985). Learning effects of knowledge of results upon time estimation.Perceptual & Motor Skills,60, 871–877.
- Montare, A. (1988). Further learning effects of knowledge of results upon time estimation.Perceptual & Motor Skills,66, 579–588.
- Navon, D., &Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human-processing system.Psychological Review,86, 214–255. CrossRef
- Ornstein, R. (1969).On the experience of time. Baltimore, MD: Penguin.
- Oskamp, S. (1962). The relationship of clinical experience and training methods to several criteria of clinical prediction.Psychological Monographs,76(28, Whole No. 547).
- Poynter, W. D. (1983). Duration judgment and the segmentation of experience.Memory & Cognition,11, 77–82. CrossRef
- Spetch, M. L., &Rusak, B. (1992). Time present and time past. In W. K. Honig & J. G. Fetterman (Eds.),Cognitive aspects of stimulus control (pp. 47–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Zakay, D. (1989). Subjective time and attentional resource allocation: An integrated model of time estimation. In I. Levin & D. Zakay (Eds.),Time and human cognition (pp. 365–397). Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossRef
- Zakay, D., & Meran, V. (1988).A meta-analysis of time estimation research. Unpublished manuscript, Tel Aviv University.
- Zakay, D., Tsal, Y., Moses, M., &Shahar, I. (1994). The role of segmentation in prospective and retrospective time estimation processes.Memory & Cognition,22, 344–351. CrossRef
- The role of learning in remembered duration
Memory & Cognition
Volume 26, Issue 5 , pp 903-921
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors