The belief-bias effect in the production and evaluation of logical conclusions
In this study, we examined whether adult subjects' beliefs regarding the empirical truth of a conclusion affected their production as well as their evaluation of a logical conclusion in a reasoning task. In addition, the relation between the ability to resolve an abstract reasoning problem correctly and the effect of belief-bias was examined. The subjects were given one of four paper-and-pencil reasoning tasks, two of them using an evaluation paradigm, and two of them using a production paradigm. Each paradigm comprised either neutral problems or belief problems. The neutral problems were constructed to be as similar as possible to the belief problems, in order to control for extraneous factors. All four tasks also included an abstract reasoning problem. The results indicate a significant belief-bias effect for both the evaluation and the production tasks. Qualitative analysis indicated that the belief-bias effect was more pervasive in the production condition. In addition, the belief-bias effect was found to exist independently of the subjects' abstract reasoning ability. The results are discussed with reference to a two-stage model, in which belief is used to resolve uncertainties in inferentially produced conclusions.
- Conover, W. J. (1980).Practical non-parametric statistics. New York: Wiley.
- Evans, J. St. B. T., Barston, J. L., &Pollard, P. (1983). On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning.Memory & Cognition,11, 295–306.
- Guyotte, M. J., &Sternberg, R. J. (1981). A transitive-chain theory of syllogistic reasoning.Cognitive Psychology,13, 461–525. CrossRef
- Hawkins, J., Pea, R. D., Glick, J., &Scribner, S. (1984). “Merds that laugh don't like mushrooms”: Evidence for deductive reasoning by preschoolers.Developmental Psychology,20, 584–594. CrossRef
- Henle, M. (1962). On the relation between logic and thinking.Psychological Review,69, 366–378. CrossRef
- Johnson-Laird, P., &Steedman, M. (1978). The psychology of syllogisms.Cognitive Psychology,10, 64–99. CrossRef
- Marcus, S. L., &Rips, L. J. (1979). Conditional reasoning.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 199–223. CrossRef
- Markovits, H. (1984). Awareness of the 'possible' as a mediator of formal thinking in conditional reasoning problems.British Journal of Psychology,75, 367–376.
- Markovits, H. (in press). Reasoning with contrary-to-fact propositionsJournal of Experimental Child Psychology.
- O'Brien, D. P., Costa, G., &Overton, W. F. (1986). Evaluations of causal and conditional hypotheses.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,38A, 493–512.
- Oakhill, J. V., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1985). The effects of belief on the spontaneous production of syllogistic conclusions.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37A, 553–569.
- Revlin, R., &Leirer, V. (1978). The effects of personal biases on syllogistic reasoning: Rational decisions from personalized representations. In R. Revlin & R. E. Meyer (Eds.),Human reasoning (pp. 51–82). Washington: Winston-Wiley.
- Revlin, R., Leirer, V., Yopp, H., &Yopp, R. (1980). The belief-bias effect in formal reasoning: The influence of knowledge on logic.Memory & Cognition,8, 584–592.
- Woodworth, R. S., &Sells, S. B. (1935). An atmosphere effect in syllogistic reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 451–460. CrossRef
- The belief-bias effect in the production and evaluation of logical conclusions
Memory & Cognition
Volume 17, Issue 1 , pp 11-17
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors