Low-variance stimulus-response latencies: Deterministic internal delays? Authors
Received: 02 April 1976 Revised: 04 June 1976 DOI:
Cite this article as: Kristofferson, A.B. Perception & Psychophysics (1976) 20: 89. doi:10.3758/BF03199438 Abstract
When special procedures are used to minimize S-R latency variance, all responses fall within a distribution which has a standard deviation near 10 msec. This minimum SD is the same whether the mean latency is at the simple RT limit or as much as 400 msec longer than that limit. Over this range, the latency distribution is everywhere the same, symmetrical and highly-peaked and not typical of RT. Above a mean latency of 550 msec, variance increases as the mean increases in the way that would be expected if SD/M were constant for the delay in excess of 550. By way of interpretation, it is proposed that there are internal time delays which can be inserted into the S-R chain. These delays can be adjusted to any value between 0 and about 400 msec, but once set, they can be deterministic. Other considerations are discussed which suggest that the deterministic time delays are in the afferent part of the S-R chain.
This research was supported by Grant A7919 from the National Research Council of Canada. The paper was written while the author was on leave at the MRC-Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge, England.
Download to read the full article text References Allan, L. G. The relationship between judgements of successiveness and judgements of order. Perception & Psychophysics, 1975, 18. 29–36. Allan, L. G., & Kristofferson, A. B. Successiveness discrimination: Two models. Perception & Psychophysics, 1974. 15, 37–46. Bartlett, N. R.
Bartlett, S. C.
Synchronization of a motor response with an anticipated sensory event.
The Psychological Review
CrossRef Getty, D. J. Discrimination of short temporal intervals: A comparison of two models. Perception & Psychophysics. 1975. 18, 1–8. Green, D. M., & Luce, R. D. Detection of auditory signals presented at random times: III. Perception & Psychophysics, 1971, 9, 257–268. Kornblum, S. Simple reaction time as a race between signal detection and time estimation: A paradigm and model. Perception & Psychophysics, 1973, 13, 108–112. Kristofferson, A. B.
Attention and psychophysical time.
CrossRef PubMed Kristoffersos, A. B., & Allan, L. G. Successiveness and duration discrimination. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV. New York and London: Academic Press, 1973. Meijers, T. M. M.
Eijkman, E. G. J.
The motor system in simple reaction time experiments.
CrossRef PubMed Naatanen, R., Muranens, V.
Timing of the expectancy peak in simple reaction time situation.
CrossRef PubMed Ollman, R. T.
Billington, M. J.
The deadline model for simple reaction times.
CrossRef Saslow, C. A. Dual payoff band control of reaction time. Perception & Psychophysics, 1974, 15, 108–114. Snodgrass, J. G. Luce, R. D., Galanter, E.
Some experiments on simple and choice reaction time.
Journal Experimental Psychology
CrossRef Treisman, M. Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: Implication for a model of the “internal clock”. Psychological Monographs, 1963, 77, No. 13. Wing, A. M., & Kristofferson, A. B. Response delays and the timing of discrete motor responses. Perception & Psychophysics, 1973, 14, 5–12. (a) Wing, A. M., & Kristofferson, A. B. The timing of interresponse intervals. Perception & Psychophysics, 1973, 455–460. (b) Woodrow
The reproduction of temporal intervals.
Journal of Experimental Psychology
CrossRef Woodrow, H.
Individual differences in the reproduction of temporal intervals.
American Journal of Psychology
CrossRef Copyright information
© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1976