Dimensions of lexical coding in Chinese and English
Phonology and orthography are closely related in some languages, such as English, and they are nearly unrelated in others, such as Chinese. The effects of these differences were assessed in a study of the roles of phonemic, graphemic, and semantic information on lexical coding and memory for Chinese logographs and English words. Some of the stimuli in the two languages were selected such that the natural confounding between phonemic and graphemic information in English was matched in the set of Chinese words used. An initial scaling study indicated that this attempt to equate degree of phonemic-graphemic confounding was successful. A second experiment used a recognition memory task for English and Chinese words with separate subject groups of native speakers of the two languages. Subjects were to select one of a pair of test words that was phonemically, graphemically, or semantically similar to a word on a previously studied list. Differences in the dimensions of lexical coding in memory were demonstrated in significant Stimulus Type by Decision Type interactions in the recognition data. Chinese-speaking subjects responded most rapidly and accurately in the graphemic recognition task, whereas performance was generally equivalent in all three tasks for the English-speaking subjects. Alphabetic and logographic writing systems apparently activate different coding and memory mechanisms such that logographic characters produce significantly more visual information in memory, whereas alphabetic words result in a more integrated code involving visual, phonological, and semantic information.
- Biederman, I., &Tsao, Y. C. On processing Chinese ideographs and English words: Some implications from Stroop-test results.Cognitive Psychology, 1979,11, 125–132. CrossRef
- Chapman, T. L. Roget’s international thesaurus (4th ed.). New York: Crowell, 1977.
- Davelaar, E., Coltheart, M., Besner, D., &Jonasson, J. T. Phonological recoding and lexical access.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 391–402.
- Gibson, E. J., &Levin, H. The psychology of reading. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press, 1975.
- Haber, R. N. How we remember what we see.Scientific American, 1970,222, 104–112. CrossRef
- Hatta, T. Recognition of Japanese Kanji in the left and right visual field.Neuropsychologia, 1977,15, 685–688. CrossRef
- Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J. L. Orthographic variations and visual information processing.Psychological Bulletin, in press.
- Juola, J. F., Fischler, I., Wood, C. T., &Atkinson, R. C. Recognition time for information stored in long-term memory.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,10, 8–14.
- Kučera, H., &Francis, W. H. Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, R.I: Brown University Press, 1967.
- Makita, K. The rarity of reading disability in Japanese children.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1968,38, 599–614. CrossRef
- Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Ruddy, M. G. Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word-recognition.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 309–321.
- National Institute for Compilation and Translation.A study on the high frequency words used in Chinese elementary school reading materials. Taipei: Chung Hwa, 1967.
- Pabk, S., &Arbuckle, T. Y. Ideograms versus alphabets: Effects of scripts on memory in (“biscriptual”) Korean subjects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1977,3, 631–642. CrossRef
- Sasanuma, S. Kana and Kanji processing in Japanese aphasics.Brain and Language, 1975,2, 369–383. CrossRef
- Sasanuma, S., Itoh, M., Kobayashi, Y., &Mori, K. The nature of the task-stimulus interaction in the tachistoscopic recognition of Kana and Kanji words.Brain and Language, 1980,9, 298–306. CrossRef
- Sasanuma, S., Itoh, M., Mori, K., &Kobayashi, Y. Tachisto-scopic recognition of Kana and Kanji words.Neuropsychologia, 1977,15, 547–553. CrossRef
- Shepard, R. N. Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1967,6, 156–163. CrossRef
- Standing, L. Learning 10,000 pictures.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 25, 207–222.
- Tarnopol, L., &Tarnopol, M. Reading and learning problems worldwide. In L. Tarnopol & M. Tarnopol (Eds.),Reading dïsabilities: An international perspective. Baltimore, Md: University Park Press, 1976.
- Turnage, T. W., &Mcginnies, E. A cross-cultural comparison of the effects of presentation mode and meaningfulness in short-term recall.American Journal of Psychology, 1973,86, 869–881. CrossRef
- Tzeng, O. J. L., &Hung, D. L. Reading in a nonalphabetic writing system: Some experimental studies. In J. F. Kavanagh & R. L. Venezky (Eds.),Orthography, reading and dyslexia. Baltimore, Md: University Park Press, 1980.
- Vanderplas, J. M., &Garvin, E. A. The association value of random shapes.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959,57, 147–154. CrossRef
- Vik, G. H. Reading disabilities in Norwegian elementary grades. In L. Tarnopol & M. Tarnopol (Eds.),Reading disabilities: An international perspective. Baltimore, Md: University Park Press, 1976.
- Dimensions of lexical coding in Chinese and English
Memory & Cognition
Volume 10, Issue 3 , pp 216-224
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors