Detection errors onthe andand: Evidence for reading units larger than the word
In five experiments, subjects read lO0-word passages and circled instances of a given target letter, letter group, or word. In each case subjects made a disproportionate number of detection errors on the common function wordsthe andand. The predominance of errors on these two words was reduced for passages in which the words were placed in an inappropriate syntactic context and for passages in which word-group identification was disturbed by the use of mixed typecases or a list, rather than a paragraph, format. These effects for the wordand were not found for the control wordant. These results were taken as evidence that familiar word sequences may be read in units larger than the word, probably short syntactic phrases or word frames. A tentative model of the reading process consistent with these results is proposed.
- Coscoran, D. W. J. An acoustic factor in letter cancellation.Nature, 1966,210, 658. CrossRef
- Doehring, D. G. Acquisition of rapid reading responses.Monograph of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1976,41, 1–54. CrossRef
- Estes, W. K. The locus of inferential and perceptual processes in letter identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975,104, 122–145. CrossRef
- Estes, W. K. On the interaction of perception and memory in reading. In D. LaBerge & S. J. Samuels (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum, in press.
- Fisher, D. F. Reading and visual search.Memory & Cognition, 1975,3, 188–196.
- Gibson, E. J. Learning to read.Science, 1965,148, 1066–1072. CrossRef
- Gibson, E. J. Perceptual learning and the theory of word perception.Cognitive Psychology, 1971,2, 351–368. CrossRef
- Healy, A. F. Detection errors on the wordthe: Evidence for reading units larger than letters.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976,2, 235–242. CrossRef
- Hochberg, J. Components of literacy: Speculations and exploratory research. In H. Levin & J. P. Williams (Eds.),Basic studies on reading. New York: Basic Books, 1970.
- Jonhon, N. F. On the function of letters in word identification: Some data and a preliminary model.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1975,14, 17–29. CrossRef
- Krueger, L. E. The effect of acoustic confusability on visual search.The American Journal of Psychology, 1970,83, 389–400. CrossRef
- Kučera, H. &Francis, W. N. Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, R.I: Brown University Press, 1967.
- LaBerge, D., &Samuels, S. J. Toward a theory of automatic information processing.Cognitive Psychology, 1974,6, 293–323. CrossRef
- McClelland, J. L. Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976,2, 80–91. CrossRef
- Spoehr, K. T., &Smith, E. E. The role of syllables in perceptual processing.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,5, 71–89. CrossRef
- Underwood, B. J., &Schulz, R. W. Meaningfulness and verbal learning. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott, 1960.
- Wheeler, D. D. Processes in word recognition.Cognitive Psychology, 1970,1, 59–85. CrossRef
- Detection errors onthe andand: Evidence for reading units larger than the word
Memory & Cognition
Volume 5, Issue 6 , pp 636-647
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors