Associative retrieval processes in free recall
- Michael J. Kahana
- … show all 1 hide
I present a new method for analyzing associative processes in free recall. While previous research has emphasized the prominence of semantic organization, the present method illustrates the importance of association by contiguity. This is done by examining conditional response probabilities in the output sequence. For a given item recalled, I examine the probability and latency that it follows an item from a nearby or distant input position. These conditional probabilities and latencies, plotted as a function of the lag between studied items, reveal several regularities about output order in free recall. First, subjects tend to recall items more often and more rapidly from adjacent input positions than from remote input positions. Second, subjects are about twice as likely to recall adjacent pairs in the forward than in the backward direction and are significantly faster in doing so. These effects are observed at all positions in the output sequence. The asymmetry effect is theoretically significant because, in cued recall, nearly symmetric retrieval is found at all serial positions (Kahana, 1995; Murdock, 1962). An attempt is made to fit the search of associative memory model (Raaijmakers & Shiffrin, 1980, 1981) with and without symmetric interitem associations to these data. Other models of free recall are also discussed.
- Asch, S. E., &Ebenholtz, S. M. (1962). The process of free recall: Evidence for non-associative factors in acquisition and retention.Journal of Experimental Psychology,54, 3–31.
- Atkinson, R. C., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). New York: Academic Press.
- Brown, S. C., Conover, J. N., Flores, L. M., &Goodman, K. M. (1991). Clustering and recall: Do high clusterers recall more than low clusterers because of clustering?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 710–721. CrossRef
- Cooke, N. M., Durso, F. T., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1986). Recall and measures of memory organization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 538–549. CrossRef
- Deese, J., &Kaufman, R. A. (1957). Serial effects in recall of unorganized and sequentially organized verbal material.Journal of Experimental Psychology,54, 180–187. CrossRef
- Gillund, G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.Psychological Review,91, 1–67. CrossRef
- Glanzer, M., &Cunitz, A. R. (1966). Two storage mechanisms in free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,5, 351–360. CrossRef
- Glenberg, A. M., &Swanson, N. G. (1986). A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 3–15. CrossRef
- Harcum, E. R. (1975).Serial learning and paralearning. New York: Wiley.
- Kahana, M. J. (1995). Associative symmetry and memory theory. Manuscript submitted for publication.
- Loftus, G. R., &Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 476–490.
- Metcalfe, J. A., &Murdock, B. B. (1981). An encoding and retrieval model of single-trial free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 161–189. CrossRef
- Murdock, B. B. (1962). The serial position effect of free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,64 482–488. CrossRef
- Murdock, B. B., &Metcalfe, J. A. (1978). Controlled rehearsal in single-trial free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 309–324. CrossRef
- Murdock, B. B., &Okada, R. (1970). Interresponse times in singletrial free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,86, 263–267.
- Nairne, J. S., Riegler, G. L., &Serra, M. (1991). Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 702–709. CrossRef
- Nelder, J. A., &Mead, R. (1965). A simplex method for function minimization.Computer Journal,7, 308–313.
- Nilsson, L.-G., Wright, E., &Murdock, B. B. (1975). The effects of visual presentation method on single-trial free recall.Memory & Cognition,3, 427–433.
- Phillips, J. L., Shiffrin, R. J., &Atkinson, R. C. (1967). The effects of list length on short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,6, 303–311. CrossRef
- Raaijmakers, J. G. W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1980). SAM: A theory of probabilistic search of associative memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 14, pp. 207–262). New York: Academic Press.
- Raaijmakers, J. G. W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory.Psychological Review,88, 93–134. CrossRef
- Rohrer, D., &Wixted, J. T. (1994). An analysis of latency and interresponse time in free recall.Memory & Cognition,22, 511–524.
- Romney, A. K., Brewer, D. D., &Batchelder, W. H. (1993). Predicting clustering from semantic structure.Psychological Science,4, 28–34. CrossRef
- Shuell, T. J. (1969). Clustering and organization in free recall.Psychological Bulletin,72, 353–374. CrossRef
- Tulving, E. (1968). Theoretical issues in free recall. In T. R. Dixon & D. L. Horton (Eds.),Verbal behavior and general behavior theory (pp. 2–36). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Associative retrieval processes in free recall
Memory & Cognition
Volume 24, Issue 1 , pp 103-109
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, 02254-9110, Waltham, MA