Memory & Cognition

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 295–306

On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning

Authors

  • J. St. B. T. Evans
    • Department of PsychologyPlymouth Polytechnic
  • Julie L. Barston
    • Department of PsychologyPlymouth Polytechnic
  • Paul Pollard
    • Department of PsychologyPlymouth Polytechnic
Open AccessArticle

DOI: 10.3758/BF03196976

Cite this article as:
Evans, J.S.B.T., Barston, J.L. & Pollard, P. Memory & Cognition (1983) 11: 295. doi:10.3758/BF03196976

Abstract

Three experiments are reported that investigate the weighting attached to logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Substantial belief biases were observed despite controls for possible conversions of the premises. Equally substantial effects of logic were observed despite controls for two possible response biases. A consistent interaction between belief and logic was also recorded; belief bias was more marked on invalid than on valid syllogisms. In all experiments, verbal protocols were recorded and analyzed. These protocols are interpreted in some cases as providing rationalizations for prejudiced decisions and, in other cases, as reflecting a genuine process of premise to conclusion reasoning. In the latter cases, belief bias was minimal but still present. Similarly, even subjects who focus primarily on the conclusion are influenced to an extent by the logic. Thus a conflict between logic and belief is observed throughout, but at several levels of extent.

Download to read the full article text

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1983