Time does not cause forgetting in short-term serial recall
Time-based theories expect memory performance to decline as the delay between study and recall of an item increases. The assumption of time-based forgetting, central to many models of serial recall, underpins their key behaviors. Here we compare the predictions of time-based and event-based models by simulation and test them in two experiments using a novel manipulation of the delay between study and retrieval. Participants were trained, via corrective feedback, to recall at different speeds, thus varying total recall time from 6 to 10 sec. In the first experiment, participants used the keyboard to enter their responses but had to repeat a word (called thesuppressor) aloud during recall to prevent rehearsal. In the second experiment, articulation was again required, but recall was verbal and was paced by the number of repetitions of the suppressor in between retrieval of items. In both experiments, serial position curves for all retrieval speeds overlapped, and output time had little or no effect. Comparative evaluation of a time-based and an event-based model confirmed that these results present a particular challenge to time-based approaches. We conclude that output interference, rather than output time, is critical in serial recall.
This research was supported by a Large Grant from the Australian Research Council to S.L. and an associated Linkage Grant awarded to S.L. and G.D.A.B., and by Grant 88/S15050 from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (U.K.)
Baddeley, A. D. (1976).The psychology of memory. New York: Basic Books.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Baddeley, A. D., Chincotta, D., Stafford, L., &Turk, D. (2002). Is the word length effect in STM entirely attributable to output delay? Evidence from serial recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 353–369.
Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. (1993). The recency effect: Implicit learning with explicit retrieval?Memory & Cognition,21, 146–155.CrossRef
Baddeley, A. D., Thomson, N., &Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 575–589.CrossRef
Beaman, C. P. (2002). Inverting the modality effect in serial recall.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 371–389.
Bjork, R. A., &Whitten, W. B. (1974). Recency-sensitive retrieval processes in long-term free recall.Cognitive Psychology,6, 173–189.CrossRef
Borowiak, D. S. (1989). Model discrimination for nonlinear regression models. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Brown, G. D. A., &Chater, N. (2001). The chronological organization of memory: Common psychological foundations for remembering and timing. In C. Hoerl & T. McCormack (Eds.),Time and memory: Issues in philosophy and psychology (pp. 77–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, G. D. A., &Hulme, C. (1995). Modeling item length effects in memory span: No rehearsal needed?Journal of Memory & Language,34, 594–621.CrossRef
Brown, G. D. A., Neath, I., & Chater, N. (2002).SIMPLE: A local distinctiveness model of scale-invariant memory and perceptual identification. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Brown, G. D. A., Vousden, J. I., McCormack, T., &Hulme, C. (1999). The development of memory for serial order: A temporal-contextual distinctiveness model.International Journal of Psychology,34, 389–402.CrossRef
Burgess, N., &Hitch, G. J. (1999). Memory for serial order: A network model of the phonological loop and its timing.Psychological Review,106, 551–581.CrossRef
Caplan, D., Rochon, E., &Waters, G. S. (1992). Articulatory and phonological determinants of word length effects in span tasks.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,45A, 177–192.
Caplan, D., &Waters, G. S. (1994). Articulatory length and phonological similarity in span tasks: A reply to Baddeley and Andrade.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47, 1055–1062.PubMed
Cowan, N., Day, L., Saults, J. S., Keller, T. A., Johnson, T., &Flores, L. (1992). The role of verbal output time in the effects of word length on immediate memory.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 1–17.CrossRef
Cowan, N., Nugent, L. D., &Elliott, E. M. (2000). Memory-search and rehearsal processes and the word length effect in immediate recall: A synthesis in reply to Service.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 666–670.CrossRef
Cowan, N., Nugent, L. D., Elliott, E. M., &Geer, T. (2000). Is there a temporal basis of the word length effect? A response to Service (1998).Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 647–660.CrossRef
Cowan, N., Saults, J. S., &Brown, G. D. A. (2004). On the auditory modality superiority effect in serial recall: Separating input and output factors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 639–644.CrossRef
Cowan, N., Saults, J. S., Elliott, E. M., &Moreno, M. (2002). Deconfounding serial recall.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 153–177.CrossRef
Cowan, N., Wood, N. L., Nugent, L.D., &Treisman, M. (1997). There are two word-length effects in verbal short-term memory: Opposed effects of duration and complexity.Psychological Science,8, 290–295.CrossRef
Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., &Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 159–180.CrossRef
Crowder, R. G. (1976).Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dosher, B. A. (1999). Item interference and time delays in working memory: Immediate serial recall.International Journal of Psychology,34, 276–284.CrossRef
Dosher, B. A., &Ma, J. J. (1998). Output loss or rehearsal loop? Output-time versus pronunciation-time limits in immediate recall for forgetting-matched materials.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 316–335.CrossRef
Duncan, M., & Lewandowsky, S. (2003).The time-course of response suppression for within- and between-list repetitions. Unpublished manuscript.
Farrell, S., &Lewandowsky, S. (2002). An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 59–79.CrossRef
Friedman, W. J. (2001). Memory processes underlying humans’ chronological sense of the past. In C. Hoerl & T. McCormack (Eds.),Time and memory: Issues in philosophy and psychology (pp. 139–167). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Glenberg, A. M., &Swanson, N. (1986). A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 3–24.CrossRef
Henson, R. N. A. (1999). Positional information in short-term memory: Relative or absolute?Memory & Cognition,27, 915–927.CrossRef
Laming, D. (1992). Analysis of short-term retention: Models for Brown—Peterson experiments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1342–1365.CrossRef
Lewandowsky, S. (1999). Redintegration and response suppression in serial recall: A dynamic network model.International Journal of Psychology,34, 434–446.CrossRef
Lewandowsky, S., & Brown, G. D. A. (in press). Serial recall and presentation schedule: A micro-analysis of local distinctiveness.Memory.
Lewandowsky, S., &Li, S.-C. (1994). Memory for serial order revisited.Psychological Review,101, 539–543.CrossRef
Lewandowsky, S., &Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1989). Memory for serial order.Psychological Review,96, 25–58.CrossRef
Li, S.-C., &Lewandowsky, S. (1993). Intra-list distractors and recall direction: Constraints on models of memory for serial order.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 895–908.CrossRef
Li, S.-C., &Lewandowsky, S. (1995). Forward and backward recall: Different retrieval processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 837–847.CrossRef
Lovatt, P., Avons, S. E., &Masterson, J. (2000). The word-length effect and disyllabic words.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 1–22.CrossRef
Lovatt, P., Avons, S. E., &Masterson, J. (2002). Output decay in immediate serial recall: Speech time revisited.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 227–243.CrossRef
Maybery, M. T., Parmentier, F. B. R., &Jones, D. M. (2002). Grouping of list items reflected in the timing of recall: Implications for models of serial verbal memory.Journal of Memory & Language,47, 360–385.CrossRef
Maylor, E. A., Vousden, J., &Brown, G. D. A. (1999). Adult age differences in short-term memory for serial order: Data and a model.Psychology & Aging,14, 572–594.CrossRef
McGeoch, J. A. (1932). Forgetting and the law of disuse.Psychological Review,39, 352–370.CrossRef
Murdock, B. B. (1995). Developing TODAM: Three models for serialorder information.Memory & Cognition,23, 631–645.CrossRef
Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory.Memory & Cognition,18, 251–269.CrossRef
Nairne, J. S., Neath, I., &Serra, M. (1997). Proactive interference plays a role in the word-length effect.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 541–545.CrossRef
Neath, I. (1993). Contextual and distinctive processes and the serial position functions.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 820–840.CrossRef
Neath, I. (1999). Modelling the disruptive effects of irrelevant speech on order information.International Journal of Psychology,34, 410–418.CrossRef
Neath, I., &Crowder, R. G. (1990). Schedules of presentation and distinctiveness in human memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 316–327.CrossRef
Neath, I., &Nairne, J. S. (1995). Word-length effects in immediate memory: Overwriting trace decay theory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 429–441.CrossRef
Ng, M. L. H., &Maybery, M. T. (2002). Grouping in short-term verbal memory: Is position coded temporally?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 391–424.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1992). Similarity scaling and cognitive process models.Annual Review of Psychology,43, 25–53.CrossRef
Service, E. (1998). The effect of word length on immediate serial recall depends on phonological complexity, not articulatory duration.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,51A, 283–304.CrossRef
Service, E. (2000). Phonological complexity and word duration in immediate recall: Different paradigms answer different questions—A comment on Cowan, Nugent, Elliott, and Geer.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 661–665.CrossRef
Turvey, M. T., Brick, P., &Osborn, J. (1970). Proactive interference in short-term memory as a function of prior-item retention interval.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,22, 142–147.CrossRef
- Time does not cause forgetting in short-term serial recall
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Volume 11, Issue 5 , pp 771-790
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links