Implicit learning of ignored visual context
Humans process a visual display more efficiently when they encounter it for a second time, showing learning of the display. This study tests whether implicit learning of complex visual contexts depends on attention. Subjects searched for a white target among black and white distractors. When the locations of the target and the attended set (white distractors) were repeated, search speed was enhanced, but when the locations of the target and the ignored set (black distractors) were repeated, search speed was unaffected. This suggests that the expression of learning depends on attention. However, during the transfer test, when the previously ignored set now was attended, it immediately facilitated performance. In contrast, when the previously attended set now was ignored, it no longer enhanced search speed. We conclude that the expression of visual implicit learning depends on attention but that latent learning of repeated information does not.
- Allport, A. (1989). Visual attention. In M. I. Posner (Ed.),Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 631–682). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Chun, M. M., &Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention.Cognitive Psychology,36, 28–71. CrossRef
- Chun, M. M., &Jiang, Y. (2003). Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 224–234. CrossRef
- Cohen, A., Ivry, R. I., &Keele, S. W. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 17–30. CrossRef
- DeSchepper, B., &Treisman, A. (1996). Visual memory for novel shapes: Implicit coding without attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 27–47. CrossRef
- Deutsch, J. A., &Deutsch, D. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations.Psychological Review,70, 80–90. CrossRef
- Endo, N., &Takeda, Y. (2004). Selective learning of spatial configuration and object identity in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,66, 293–302. CrossRef
- Frensch, P. A., Lin, J., &Buchner, A. (1998). Learning versus behavioral expression of the learned: The effects of a secondary tonecounting task on implicit learning in the serial reaction task.Psychological Research,61, 83–98. CrossRef
- Frensch, P. A., Wenke, D., &Rünger, D. (1999). A secondary tonecounting task suppresses expression of knowledge in the serial reaction task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 260–274. CrossRef
- Jiang, Y., &Chun, M. M. (2001). Selective attention modulates implicit learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54A, 1105–1124.
- Jiang, Y., & Leung, A. W. (2004). [Learning of spatial context in simple feature and conjunction searches.] Unpublished data.
- Kamin, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.),Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279–296). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
- Kawahara, J. (2003). Contextual cueing in 3D layouts defined by binocular disparity.Visual Cognition,10, 837–852. CrossRef
- Levin, D. T., &Simons, D. J. (1997). Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 501–506. CrossRef
- Luck, S. J., &Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.Nature,390, 279–281. CrossRef
- Mack, A., &Rock, I. (1998).Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Moore, C. M., &Egeth, H. (1997). Perception without attention: Evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 339–352. CrossRef
- Nissen, M. J., &Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures.Cognitive Psychology,19, 1–32. CrossRef
- Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J. K., &Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes.Psychological Science,8, 368–373. CrossRef
- Rock, I., &Gutman, D. (1981). The effect of inattention on form perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 275–285. CrossRef
- Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., Aslin, R. N., Tunick, R. A., &Barrueco, S. (1997). Incidental language learning: Listening (and learning) out of the corner of your ear.Psychological Science,8, 101–105. CrossRef
- Shanks, D. R., &Channon, S. (2002). Effects of a secondary task on “implicit” sequence learning: Learning or performance?Psychological Research,66, 99–109. CrossRef
- Stadler, M. A. (1995). Role of attention in implicit learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 674–685. CrossRef
- Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men.Psychological Review,55, 189–208. CrossRef
- Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136. CrossRef
- Implicit learning of ignored visual context
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Volume 12, Issue 1 , pp 100-106
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links