Adams, J. A.
(1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning.Journal of Motor Behavior
Adams, J. A. (1976). Issues for a closed-loop theory of motor learning. In G. E. Stemach (Ed.),Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 229–240). New York: Academic Press.
Adams, J. A. (1987). Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills.Psychological Bulletin,101, 41–74.
Albaret, J.-M., &Thon, B. (1999). Differential effects of task complexity on contextual interference in a drawing task.Acta Psychologica,100, 9–24.
Al-Mustafa, A. A. (1989, June).Contextual interference: Blocking within a random order. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American Society for the Psychology of Sport and Physical Activity, Asilomar, CA.
Anderson, J. R., &Fincham, J. M. (1994). Acquisition of procedural skills from examples.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1322–1340.
Bachman, J. C. (1961). Specificity vs. generality in learning and performing two large muscle motor tasks.Research Quarterly,32, 3–11.
Banaji, M. R., &Crowder, R. G. (1989). The bankruptcy of everyday memory.American Psychologist,44, 1185–1193.
Battig, W. F. (1972). Intratask interference as a source of facilitation in transfer and retention. In R. F. Thompson & J. F. Voss (Eds.),Topics in learning and performance (pp. 131–159). New York: Academic Press.
Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,46, 610–620.
Baumeister, R. F., &Steinhilber, A. (1984). Paradoxical effects of supportive audiences on performance under pressure: The home field disadvantage.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,47, 85–93.
Bernstein, N. (1967).The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Oxford: Pergamon.
Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.),Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–207). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Blandin, Y., Proteau, L.
, &Alain, C.
(1994). On the cognitive processes underlying contextual interference and observational learning.Journal of Motor Behavior
Bortoli, L., Robazza, C., Durigon, V., &Carra, C. (1992). Effects of contextual interference on learning technical sports skills.Perceptual & Motor Skills,75, 555–562.
Brown, H. S., &Messersmith, L. (1948). An experiment in teaching tumbling with and without motion pictures.Research Quarterly,18, 304–307.
Burwitz, L. (1975).Observational learning and motor performance. Paper presented at the FEPSAC Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Carnahan, H., Van Eerd, D. L.
, &Allard, F.
(1990). A note on the relationship between task requirements and the contextual interference effect.Journal of Motor Behavior
Carr, J., &Shepherd, R. (2000).Movement science: Foundations for physical therapy in rehabilitation. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
Del Rey, P. (1982). Effects of contextual interference on memory of older females differing in levels of physical activity.Perceptual & Motor Skills,55, 171–180.
Del Rey, P., Whitehurst, M., Wughalter, E., &Barnwell, B. (1983). Contextual interference and experience in acquisition and transfer.Perceptual & Motor Skills,57, 241–242.
Del Rey, P., Wughalter, M. E., &Carnes, M. (1987). Level of expertise, interpolated activity, and contextual interference effects on memory and transfer.Perceptual & Motor Skills,64, 275–284.
Del Rey, P., Wughalter, M. E., &Whitehurst, M. (1982). The effects of contextual interference on females with varied experience in open sport skills.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,53, 108–115.
den Brinker, B. P. L. M., &van Hekken, M. F. (1982). The analysis of slalom-type movements using a ski-simulator apparatus.Human Movement Science,1, 91–108.
Durand, M., Geoffroi, V., Varray, A., &Préfaut, C. (1994). Study of the energy correlates in the learning of a complex self-paced cyclical skill.Human Movement Science,13, 785–799.
Farrow, D., &Maschette, W. (1997). The effects of contextual interference on children learning forehand tennis groundstrokes.Journal of Human Movement Studies,33, 47–67.
Fery, Y. A.
, &VomHofe, A.
(2000). When will the ball rebound? Evidence for the usefulness of mental analogies in appraising the duration of motions.British Journal of Psychology
Fitts, P. M.
(1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.Journal of Experimental Psychology
Fitts, P. M., &Posner, M. I. (1967).Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
French, K. E., Rink, J. E., &Werner, P. F. (1990). Effects of contextual interference on retention of three volleyball skills.Perceptual & Motor Skills,71, 179–186.
Gable, C. D., Shea, C. H., &Wright, D. L. (1991). Summary knowledge of results.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,62, 285–292.
Gabriele, T. E., Hall, C. R., &Buckolz, E. E. (1987). Practice schedule effects on the acquisition and retention of a motor skill.Human Movement Science,6, 1–16.
Gabriele, T. E., Hall, C. R., &Lee, T. D. (1989). Cognition in motor learning: Imagery effects on contextual interference.Human Movement Science,8, 227–245.
Gabriele, T. E., Lee, T. D., &Hall, C. R. (1991). Contextual interference in movement timing: Specific effects in retention and transfer.Journal of Human Movement Studies,20, 177–188.
Gallwey, W. T. (1982).The inner game of tennis. New York: Bantam Books.
Goode, S. L. (1986).The contextual interference effect in learning an open motor skill. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Louisiana, Baton Rouge.
Goode, S. L., &Magill, R. A. (1986). The contextual interference effect in learning three badminton serves.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,57, 308–314.
Gould, D. (1980).The influence of motor task types on model effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois, Urbana.
Guadagnoli, M. A., Dornier, L. A., &Tandy, R. D. (1996). Optimal length for summary knowledge of results: The influence of taskrelated experience and complexity.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,67, 239–248.
Hagman, J. D. (1983). Presentation- and test-trial effects on acquisition and retention of distance and location.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 334–345.
Hall, K. G., Domingues, D. A., &Cavazos, R. (1994). Contextual interference effects with skilled baseball players.Perceptual & Motor Skills,78, 835–841.
Hebert, E. P., Landin, D., &Solmon, M. A. (1996). Practice schedule effects on the performance and learning of low- and high-skilled students: An applied study.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,67, 52–58.
Henry, F. M. (1968). Specificity vs. generality in learning motor skill. In R. C. Brown, Jr., & G. S. Kenyon (Eds.),Classical studies in physical activity (pp. 328–331). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Henry, F. M., &Rogers, D. E. (1964). Increased response latency for complicated movements and the “memory drum” theory of neuromotor reaction.Research Quarterly,31, 448–458.
Hoffman, S. J. (1990). Relevance, application, and the development of an unlikely theory.Quest,42, 143–160.
Holding, D. H. (1969). Learning without errors. In L. E. Smith (Ed.),Psychology of motor learning (pp. 59–81). Chicago: Athletic Institute.
Holding, D. H., &Macrae, A. W. (1964). Guidance, restriction and knowledge of results.Ergonomics,7, 289–295.
Holding, D. H.
, &Macrae, A. W.
(1966). Rate and force of guidance in perceptual-motor tasks with reversed or random spatial correspondence.Ergonomics
Hommel, B. (1997). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.),Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 281–320). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
James, W. (1890).The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Dover.
Jeannerod, M. (1994). The timing of natural prehension.Journal of Motor Behavior,16, 201–211.
Jelsma, O., &Pieters, J. M. (1989). Practice schedule and cognitive style interaction in learning a maze task.Applied Cognitive Psychology,3, 73–83.
Jelsma, O., &Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1989). Contextual interference: Interactions with reflection-impulsivity.Perceptual & Motor Skills,68, 1055–1064.
Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 201–211.
Jordan, J. A. (1997).The effectiveness of individual and dyadic training protocols for complex skill acquisition in space fortress: A metaanalysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Texas A&M University, College Station.
Kahnemann, D. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kelso, J. A. S. (1977). Planning and efferent components in the coding of movement.Journal of Motor Behavior,9, 33–47.
Kelso, J. A. S. (1995).Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Klapp, S. (1995). Motor response programming during simple and choice reaction time: The role of practice.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 1015–1022.
Kohl, R. M., &Fisicaro, S. A. (1996). Response intention and imagery processes: Locus, interaction, and contribution to motor learning.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,19, 760–762.
Kohl, R. M.
, &Shea, C. H.
(1992). Pew (1966) revisited: Acquisition of hierarchical control as a function of observational practice.Journal of Motor Behavior
, &Shea, C. H.
(1998). Generalized motor program (GMP) learning: Effects of reduced frequency of knowledge of results and practice variability.Journal of Motor Behavior
Lai, Q., &Shea, C. H. (1999). Bandwidth knowledge of results enhances generalized motor program learning.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,70, 79–83.
Lai, Q., Shea, C. H., Wulf, G., &Wright, D. L. (2000). Optimizing generalized motor programs and parameter learning.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,71, 10–24.
Landers, D. M., &Landers, D. M. (1973). Teacher versus peer models: Effects of model’s presence and performance level on motor behavior.Journal of Motor Behavior,5, 129–139.
Lavery, J. J. (1962). Retention of simple motor skills as a function of type of knowledge of results.Canadian Journal of Psychology,16, 300–311.
Lee, T. D., &Carnahan, H. (1990). When to provide knowledge of results during motor learning: Scheduling effects.Human Performance,3, 87–105.
Lee, T. D., &Genovese, E. D. (1988). Distribution of practice in motor skill acquisition: Learning and performance effects reconsidered.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,59, 277–287.
Lee, T. D., &Genovese, E. D. (1989). Distribution of practice in motor skill acquisition: Different effects for discrete and continuous tasks.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,60, 59–65.
Lee, T. D., &Magill, R. A. (1983). The locus of contextual interference in motor-skill acquisition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 730–746.
Lee, T. D., &Magill, R. A. (1985). Can forgetting facilitate skill acquisition? In D. Goodman, R. B. Wilberg, & I. M. Franks (Eds.),Differing perspectives on memory, learning and control (pp. 3–22). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Lee, T. D., Swinnen, S. P., &Serrien, D. J. (1994). Cognitive effort and motor learning.Quest,46, 328–344.
Lee, T. D., &White, M. A. (1990). Influence of an unskilled model’s practice schedule on observational motor learning.Human Movement Science,9, 349–367.
Lee, T. D., Wishart, L. R., Cunningham, S., &Carnahan, H. (1997). Modeled timing information during random practice eliminates the contextual interference effect.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,68, 100–105.
Lee, T. D., Wulf, G., &Schmidt, R. A. (1992). Contextual interference in motor learning: Dissociated effects due to the nature of task variations.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,44A, 627–644.
Limons, E., &Shea, J. B. (1988). Deficient processing in learning and performance. In A. M. Colley & R. J. Beech (Eds.),Cognition and action in skilled behavior (pp. 333–347). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Locke, L. F. (1990). Why motor learning is ignored: A case of ducks, naughty theories, and unrequited love.Quest,42, 136–142.
Lotze, R. H. (1852).Medicinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele (Medical psychology or physiology of the soul). Leipzig: Weidmann’sche Buchhandlung.
Maddox, D., Wulf, G., & Wright, D. L. (2000).The effects of an internal vs. external focus of attention on the learning of a tennis backhand. Unpublished manuscript, Texas A&M University.
Magill, R. A., Chamberlin, C. J., &Hall, K. G. (1991). Verbal knowledge of results as redundant information for learning an anticipation timing skill.Human Movement Science,10, 485–507.
Magill, R. A., &Hall, K. G. (1990). A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition.Human Movement Science,9, 241–289.
Martens, R., Burwitz, L.
, &Zuckerman, J.
(1976). Modeling effects on motor performance.Research Quarterly
Massaro, D. W. (1990). An information-processing analysis of perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.),Relationships between perception and action: Current approaches (pp. 133–166). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
McCullagh, P., Weiss, M. R., &Ross, D. (1989). Modeling considerations in motor skill acquisition and performance: An integrated approach. In K. Pandolf (Ed.),Exercise and sport science reviews (Vol. 17, pp. 475–513). Baltimore: Williams & Wadkins.
McNevin, N. H., Shea, C. H., & Wulf, G. (in press). Increasing the distance of an external focus of attention enhances learning.Psychological Research.
Neisser, U. (1991). A case of misplaced nostalgia.American Psychologist,46, 34–36.
Neisser, U., &Winograd, E. (1988).Remembering reconsidered: Ecological and traditional approaches to the study of memory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Newell, K. M.
(1991). Motor skill acquisition.Annual Review of Psychology
Newell, K. M., &Slifkin, A. B. (1996). The nature of movement variability. In J. Piek (Ed.),Motor control and human skill: A multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 143–159). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Nicholson, D. E., &Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Scheduling information feedback to enhance training effectiveness. InProceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting (pp. 1400–1403). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
Park, J.-H., Shea, C. H.
, &Wright, D. L.
(2000). Reduced-frequency concurrent and terminal feedback: A test of the guidance hypothesis.Journal of Motor Behavior
Pew, R. W.
(1966). Acquisition of hierarchical control over the temporal organization of a skill.Journal of Experimental Psychology
Pigott, R. E., &Shapiro, D. C. (1984). Motor schema: The structure of the variability session.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,55, 41–45.
Pinto-Zipp, G., &Gentile, A. M. (1995). Practice schedules in motor learning: Children vs. adults.Society of Neuroscience: Abstracts,21, 1620.
, &Collard, R.
(1982). Structural factors in patterned finger tapping.Acta Psychologica
Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.),Relationships between perception and action (pp. 167–201). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Prinz, W. (1992). Why don’t we perceive our brain states?European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,4, 1–20.
Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,9, 129–154.
Prinz, W., Aschersleben, G., Hommel, B., &Vogt, S. (1995). Handlungen als Ereignisse [Actions as events]. In D. Dörner & E. van der Meer (Eds.),Das Gedächtnis: Probleme—Trends—Perspektiven (pp. 129–168). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Proctor, R. W., &Dutta, A. (1993). Do the same stimulus-response relations influence choice reactions initially and after practice? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 922–930.
Riley, M. A., Stoffregen, T. A., Grocki, M. J., &Turvey, M. T. (1999). Postural stabilization for the control of touching.Human Movement Science,18, 795–817.
Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A
, &Walter, C. B.
(1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical appraisal.Psychological Bulletin
Sanders, A. F. (1980). Stage analysis of reaction processes. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.),Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 331–354). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Schmidt, R. A. (1988).Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Schmidt, R. A. (1991a). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In J. Requin & G. E. Stelmach (Eds.),Tutorials in motor neuroscience (pp. 59–75). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Schmidt, R. A. (1991b).Motor learning and performance: From principles to practice. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Schmidt, R. A., &Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new principles for training.Psychological Science,3, 207–217.
Schmidt, R. A., Lange, C., &Young, D. E. (1990). Optimizing summary knowledge of results for skill learning.Human Movement Science,9, 325–348.
Schmidt, R. A., &Wrisberg, C. A. (2000).Motor learning and performance: A problem-based learning approach (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Schmidt, R. A.
, &Wulf, G.
(1997). Continuous concurrent feedback degrades skill learning: Implications for training and simulation.Human Factors
Schmidt, R. A., Young, D. E., Swinnen, S., &Shapiro, D. E. (1989). Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 352–359.
Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S.
, &Quinn, J. T.
(1979). Motor-output variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts.Psychological Review
Schneider, W., &Fisk, A. D. (1983). Attention theory and mechanisms for skilled performance. In R. A. Magill (Ed.),Memory and control of action (pp. 119–143). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Schneider, W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review,84, 1–66.
Schönfelder-Zohdi, B. G. (1992).Investigating the informational nature of a modelled visual demonstration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
Scully, D. M., &Newell, K. M. (1985). Observational learning and the acquisition of motor skills: Toward a visual perception perspective.Journal of Human Movement Studies,11, 169–186.
Sekiya, H., Magill, R. A., &Anderson, D. I. (1996). The contextual interference effect in parameter modifications of the same generalized motor program.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,67, 59–68.
Sekiya, H., Magill, R. A., Sidaway, B., &Anderson, D. I. (1994). The contextual interference effect for skill variations from the same and different generalized motor programs.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,65, 330–338.
Shapiro, D. C., &Schmidt, R. A. (1982). The schema theory: Recent evidence and developmental implications. In J. A. S. Kelso & J. E. Clark (Eds.),The development of movement control and co-ordination (pp. 113–150). New York: Wiley.
Shea, C. H., Kohl, R., &Indermill, C. (1990). Contextual interference: Contributions of practice.Acta Psychologica,73, 145–157.
Shea, C. H., Lai, Q., Wright, D. L., Immink, M.
, &Black, C.
(2001). Consistent and variable practice conditions: Effects on generalized motor program and parameter learning.Journal of Motor Behavior
Shea, C. H., Wright, D. L., Wulf, G.
, &Whitacre, C.
(2000). Physical and observational practice afford unique learning opportunities.Journal of Motor Behavior
Shea, C. H., &Wulf, G. (1999). Enhancing motor learning through external-focus instructions and feedback.Human Movement Science,18, 553–571.
Shea, C. H., Wulf, G., Whitacre, C. A.
(1999). Enhancing training efficiency and effectiveness through the use of dyad training.Journal of Motor Behavior
Shea, J. B., &Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 179–187.
Shea, J. B.
, &Titzer, R. C.
(1993). The influence of reminder trials on contextual interference effect.Journal of Motor Behavior
Shea, J. B., &Zimny, S. T. (1983). Context effects in learning movement information. In R. A. Magill (Ed.),Memory and the control of action (pp. 345–366). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Shebilske, W. L., Regian, J. W., Arthur, W., &Jordan, J. A. (1992). A dyadic protocol for training complex skills.Human Factors,34, 369–374.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.Psychological Review,84, 127–190.
Sidaway, B., &Hand, M. J. (1993). Frequency of modeling effects on the acquisition and retention of a motor skill.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,64, 122–126.
Singer, R. N., Lidor, R., &Cauraugh, J. H. (1993). To be aware or not aware: What to think about while learning and performing a motor skill.Sport Psychologist,7, 19–30.
Smith, P. J. K., &Davies, M. (1995). Applying contextual interference to the Pawlata roll.Journal of Sport Sciences,13, 455–462.
Swanson, L., &Lee, T. D. (1992). The effects of aging and scheduling of knowledge of results on motor learning.Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences,47, 406–411.
Swinnen, S. P., Lee, T. D., Verschueren, S., Serrien, D. J., &Bogaerds, H. (1997). Interlimb coordination: Learning and transfer under different feedback conditions.Human Movement Science,16, 749–785.
Swinnen, S. P., Schmidt, R. A., Nicholson, D. E., &Shapiro, D. C. (1990). Information feedback for skill acquisition: Instantaneous knowledge of results degrades learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 706–716.
Tarpy, R. M. (1982).Principles of animal learning and motivation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Todorov, E., Shadmehr, R.
, &Bizzi, E.
(1997). Augmented feedback presented in a virtual environment accelerates learning of a difficult motor task.Journal of Motor Behavior
Tsutsui, S., Lee, T. D.
, &Hodges, N. J.
(1998). Contextual interference in learning new patterns of bimanual coordination.Journal of Motor Behavior
Vallacher, R. R., &Wegner, D. M. (1985).A theory of action identification. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Vallacher, R. R., &Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior.Psychological Review,94, 3–15.
Vander Linden, D. W., Cauraugh, J. H., &Greene, T. A. (1993). The effect of frequency of kinetic feedback on learning an isometric force production task in nondisabled subjects.Physical Therapy,73, 79–87.
Vereijken, B. (1991).The dynamics of skill acquisition. Meppel: Krips Repro.
Vereijken, B., van Emmerik, R. E. A., Whiting, H. T. A., &Newell, K. M. (1992). Free(z)ing degrees of freedom in skill acquisition.Journal of Motor Behavior,24, 133–142.
Weeks, D. L.
, &Anderson, L. P.
(2000). The interaction of observational learning and overt practice: Effects on motor skill learning.Acta Psychologica
Weeks, D. L., &Kordus, R. N. (1998). Relative frequency of knowledge of performance and motor skill learning.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,69, 224–230.
Weiss, P. (1939).Principles of development. New York: Holt.
Welford, A. T. (1968).Fundamentals of skill. London: Methuen.
Whitacre, C. A.
, &Shea, C. H.
(2000). The performance and learning of generalized motor programs: Relative (GMP) and absolute (parameter) errors.Journal of Motor Behavior
Whiting, H. T. A. (1988). Imitation and the learning of complex cyclical actions. In O. G. Meijer & K. Roth (Eds.),Complex motor behavior: The motor action controversy (pp. 381–401). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Wightman, D., &Lintern, G. (1985). Part-task training for tracking and manual control.Human Factors,27, 267–283.
Willingham, D. B.
(1998). A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning.Psychological Review
Winstein, C. J., Pohl, P. S., Cardinale, C., Green, A., Scholtz, L.
, &Waters, C. S.
(1996). Learning a partial-weight-bearing skill: Effectiveness of two forms of feedback.Physical Therapy
Winstein, C. J., Pohl, P. S., &Lewthwaite, R. (1994). Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning: Support for the guidance hypothesis.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,65, 316–323.
Winstein, C. J., &Schmidt, R. A. (1990). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 677–691.
Wright, D. L., Li, Y., &Coady, W. J. (1994). Cognitive processes related to contextual interference and observational learning: A replication of Blandin, Proteau, and Alain (1994).Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,68, 106–109.
Wright, D. L., Li, Y., &Whitacre, C. (1992). The contribution of elaborative processing to the contextual interference effect.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,63, 30–37.
Wright, D. L., &Shea, C. H. (2001). Manipulating generalized motor program difficulty during blocked and random practice does not affect parameter learning.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,72, 32–38.
Wrisberg, C. A. (1991). A field test of the effect of contextual variety during skill acquisition.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,11, 21–30.
Wrisberg, C. A., &Liu, Z. (1991). The effect of contextual variety on the practice, retention, and transfer of an applied motor skill.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,62, 406–412.
Wulf, G. (1992). The learning of generalized motor programs and motor schemata: Effects of KR relative frequency and contextual interference.Journal of Human Movement Studies,23, 53–76.
Wulf, G., & Bühner, M. (1996). Unpublished data. Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research, Munich.
Wulf, G., Hörger, M.
, &Shea, C. H.
(1999). Benefits of blocked over serial feedback in complex motor skill learning.Journal of Motor Behavior
Wulf, G., Höß, M.
, &Prinz, W.
(1998). Instructions for motor learning: Differential effects of internal vs. external focus of attention.Journal of Motor Behavior
Wulf, G., Lauterbach, B., &Toole, T. (1999). Learning advantages of an external focus of attention in golf.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,70, 120–126.
, &Lee, T. D.
(1993) Contextual interference effects in movements of the same class: Differential effects on program and parameter learning.Journal of Motor Behavior
Wulf, G., Lee, T. D.
, &Schmidt, R. A.
(1994). Reducing knowledge of results about relative versus absolute timing: Differential effects on learning.Journal of Motor Behavior
Wulf, G., McConnel, N., Gärtner, M., & Schwarz, A. (in press). Feedback and attentional focus: Enhancing the learning of the volleyball serve through external-focus feedback.Journal of Motor Behavior.
Wulf, G., McNevin, N. H., &Shea, C. H. (2001). The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54A, 1143–1154.
Wulf, G., &Schmidt, R. A. (1989). The learning of generalized motor programs: Reducing the relative frequency of knowledge of results enhances memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 748–757.
, &Schmidt, R. A.
(1994). Feedback-induced variability and the learning of generalized motor programs.Journal of Motor Behavior
Wulf, G., Schmidt, R. A., &Deubel, H. (1993). Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1134–1150.
Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (1997). [Unpublished data.] Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research, Munich.
Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (1998). [Unpublished data]. Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research, Munich.
Wulf, G., Shea, C. H.
, &Matschiner, S.
(1998). Frequent feedback enhances complex motor skill learning.Journal of Motor Behavior
Wulf, G., Shea, C. H., &Park, J.-H. (2001). Attention in motor learning: PReferences for and advantages of an external focus.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,72, 335–344.
Wulf, G., Shea, C. H.
, &Whitacre, C. A.
(1998). Physical guidance benefits in learning a complex motor skill.Journal of Motor Behavior
Wulf, G., Shea, J. B., &Rice, M. (1996). Type of KR and KR frequency effects on motor learning.Journal of Human Movement Studies,30, 1–18.
Wulf, G., &Weigelt, C. (1997). Instructions about physical principles in learning a complex motor skill: To tell or not to tell.Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport,68, 362–367.
Yao, W.-X., Fischman, M. G.
, &Wang, Y. T.
(1994). Motor skill acquisition and retention as a function of average feedback, summary feedback, and performance variability.Journal of Motor Behavior
Young, D. E., Cohen, M. J., &Husak, W. S. (1993). Contextual interference and motor skill acquisition: On the processes that influence retention.Human Movement Science,12, 577–600.
Zamani, M., &Richard, J. F. (2000). Object encoding, goal similarity, and analogical transfer.Memory & Cognition,28, 873–886.