Elemental versus configural perception in a people-present/people-absent discrimination task by pigeons
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
In the present experiment, we investigated whether pigeons rely exclusively on elemental information or whether they are also able to exploit configural information in apeople-present/people-absent discrimination task. Six pigeons were trained in a go/no-go procedure to discriminate between 800 color photographs characterized by the presence or absence of people. Thepeople-present stimuli were designated as positive, and thepeople-absent stimuli were designated as negative. After training and a subsequent generalization test, the pigeons were presented with both familiar and novel people-present stimuli containing human figures that were distorted in one of seven different ways. All the pigeons learned the initial discrimination and also showed generalization to novel stimuli. In the subsequent test, performance on all types of distorted stimuli was diminished in comparison with that on the intact original pictures from which they had been derived. At the same time, however, peck rates clearly exceeded the level of responding found for regular people-absent stimuli. This result strongly suggests that responding was controlled by both the constituting target components and their spatial relations and, therefore, points to the dual importance of elemental and configural information.
- Aust, U., &Huber, L. (2001). The role of item- and category-specific information in the discrimination of people versus nonpeople images by pigeons.Animal Learning & Behavior,29, 107–119.
- Aust, U., &Huber, L. (2002). Target-defining features in a “peoplepresent/ people-absent” discrimination task by pigeons.Animal Learning & Behavior,30, 165–176.
- Bovet, D., &Vauclair, J. (2000). Picture recognition in animals and humans.Behavioural Brain Research,109, 143–165. CrossRef
- Brown, S.D., &Dooling, R. J. (1993). Perception of conspecific faces by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): II. Synthetic models.Journal of Comparative Psychology,107, 48–60. CrossRef
- Butler, R. A., &Woolpy, J. H. (1963). Visual attention in the rhesus monkey.Journal of Comparative Physiology & Psychology,56, 324–328. CrossRef
- Cerella, J. (1977). Absence of perspective processing in the pigeon.Pattern Recognition,9, 65–68. CrossRef
- Cerella, J. (1980). The pigeon’s analysis of pictures.Pattern Recognition,12, 1–6. CrossRef
- Cerella, J. (1982). Mechanisms of concept formation in the pigeon. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.),Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 241–249). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Cerella, J. (1986). Pigeons and perceptrons.Pattern Recognition,19, 431–438. CrossRef
- Cook, R. G. (2001). Hierarchical stimulus processing in pigeons. In R. G. Cook (Ed.),Avian visual cognition [on-line]. Retrieved from www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/cook/.
- Dawkins, M. S., Guilford, T., Braithwaite, V. A., &Krebs, J. R. (1996). Discrimination and recognition of photographs of places by homing pigeons.Behavioural Processes,36, 27–38. CrossRef
- Delius, J. D., Emmerton, J., Hörster, W., Jäger, R., &Ostheim, J. (2000). Picture-object recognition in pigeons. In J. Fagot (Ed.),Picture perception in animals (pp. 1–35). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
- Delius, J. D., &Hollard, V. D. (1995). Orientation invariant pattern recognition by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).Journal of Comparative Psychology,109, 276–290. CrossRef
- Fagot, J., Martin-Malivel, J., &Dépy, D. (2000). What is the evidence for an equivalence between objects and pictures in birds and nonhuman primates? In J. Fagot (Ed.),Picture perception in animals (pp. 295–320). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
- Fagot, J., &Tomonaga, M. (1999). Global and local processing in humans (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Use of a visual search task with compound stimuli.Journal of Comparative Psychology,113, 3–12. CrossRef
- Fagot, J., Tomonaga, M., &Deruelle, C. (2001). Processing of the global and local dimensions of visual hierarchical stimuli by humans (Homo sapiens), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and baboon (Papio papio). In T. Matsuzawa (Ed.),Primate origins of human cognition and behavior (pp. 87–103). Tokyo: Springer-Verlag.
- Herrnstein, R. J. (1984). Objects, categories, and discriminative stimuli. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.),Animal cognition (pp. 233–261). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Herrnstein, R. J. (1985). Riddles of natural categorization. In L. Weiskrantz (Ed.),Animal intelligence (Vol. 7, pp. 129–144). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Herrnstein, R. J., &Loveland, D.H. (1964). Complex visual concept in the pigeon.Science,146, 549–551. CrossRef
- Herrnstein, R. J., Loveland, D.H., &Cable, C. (1976). Natural concepts in pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,2, 285–311. CrossRef
- Hollard, V.D., &Delius, J. D. (1982). Rotational invariance in visual pattern recognition by pigeons and humans.Science,218, 804–806. CrossRef
- Huber, L. (1994). Amelioration of laboratory conditions for pigeons (Columba livia).Animal Welfare,3, 321–324.
- Huber, L., &Aust, U. (2001). The relevance of evolution, species comparison, color, and categorization for the object identity problem.Cahier de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition,20, 221–229.
- Huber, L., Aust, U., Michelbach, G., Ölzant, S., &Nowotny, R. (1999). Limits of symmetry conceptualization in pigeons.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,52B, 351–379.
- Jacobs, G.H. (1993). The distribution and nature of color vision among the mammals.Biological Review,68, 413–471. CrossRef
- Jitsumori, M. (1991). Do monkeys see meaningful objects in slide pictures? In A. Ehara, T. Kimura, & International Primatological Society (Eds.),Primatology today (pp. 293–296). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
- Kirkpatrick, K. (2001). Object recognition. In R. G. Cook (Ed.),Avian visual cognition [on-line]. Retrieved from www.pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/kirkpatrick/.
- Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Wasserman, E.A., &Biederman, I. (1996). Effects of spatial rearrangement of object components on picture recognition in pigeons.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,65, 465–475. CrossRef
- Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Wasserman, E.A., &Biederman, I. (1998). Effects of geon deletion, scrambling, and movement on picture recognition in pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,24, 34–46. CrossRef
- Lea, S. E. G., &Dittrich, W. (2000). What do birds see in moving video images? In J. Fagot (Ed.),Picture perception in animals(pp. 143–180). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
- Loidolt, M.,Aust, U.,Meran, I., &Huber, L. (2003).Pigeons use item-specific and category-specific information in the identification and categorization of human face stimuli. Manuscript submitted for publication.
- Miller, R. J. (1973). Cross-cultural research in the perception of pictorial materials.Psychological Bulletin,80, 135–150. CrossRef
- Mollon, J. D. (1989). “Tho’ she kneel’d in that place where they grew …”Journal of Experimental Biology,146, 21–38.
- Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception.Cognitive Psychology,9, 353–383. CrossRef
- Navon, D. (1981). The forest revisited: More on global precedence.Psychological Research,43, 1–32. CrossRef
- Navon, D. (1983). How many trees does it take to make a forest?Perception,12, 239–254. CrossRef
- Riley, D. A. (1984). Do pigeons decompose stimulus compounds? In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.),Animal cognition (pp. 333–350). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Ryan, C. M. E., &Lea, S. E. G. (1994). Images of conspecifics as categories to be discriminated by pigeons and chickens: Slides, video tapes, stuffed birds and live birds.Behavioural Processes,33, 155–175. CrossRef
- Steele, K. M. (1990). Configural processes in pigeon perception. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, S. M. Kosslyn, & D. B. Mumford (Eds.),Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 8. Behavioral approaches to pattern recognition and concept formation (pp. 111–125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Towe, A. L. (1954). A study of figural equivalence in the pigeon.Journal of Comparative Psychology,47, 283–287. CrossRef
- Troje, N. F., Huber, L., Loidolt, M., Aust, U., &Fieder, M. (1999). Categorical learning in pigeons: The role of texture and shape in complex static stimuli.Vision Research,39, 353–366. CrossRef
- Van Hamme, L. J., Wasserman, E. A., &Biederman, I. (1992). Discrimination of contour-deleted images by pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,18, 387–399. CrossRef
- Vaughan, W. J., &Greene, S. L. (1984). Pigeon visual memory capacity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,10, 256–271. CrossRef
- Wasserman, E. A., Gagliardi, J. L., Cook, B. R., Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Astley, S. L., &Biederman, I. (1996). The pigeon’s recognition of drawings of depth-rotated stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,22, 205–221. CrossRef
- Wasserman, E. A., Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Van Hamme, L. J., &Biederman, I. (1993). Pigeons are sensitive to the spatial organization of complex visual stimuli.Psychological Science,4, 336–341. CrossRef
- Watanabe, S. (1993). Object-picture equivalence in the pigeon: An analysis with natural concept and pseudo concept discrimination.Behavioural Processes,30, 225–232. CrossRef
- Watanabe, S. (2000). How do pigeons see pictures? Recognition of the real world from its 2-D representation. In J. Fagot (Ed.),Picture perception in animals (pp. 71–90). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
- Watanabe, S. (2001). Discrimination of cartoons and photographs in pigeons: Effects of scrambling of elements.Behavioural Processes,53, 3–9. CrossRef
- Watanabe, S., &Ito, Y. (1991). Discrimination of individuals in pigeons.Bird Behavior,9, 20–29.
- Winner, H., &Ettlinger, E. (1978). Do chimpanzees recognize photographs as representations of objects?Neuropsychology,17, 413–420.
- Wurm, L. H., Legge, G. E., Isenberg, L. M., &Luebker, A. (1993). Color improves object recognition in normal and low vision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 899–911. CrossRef
- Elemental versus configural perception in a people-present/people-absent discrimination task by pigeons
Animal Learning & Behavior
Volume 31, Issue 3 , pp 213-224
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links