Self-validating presentation and response timing in cognitive paradigms: How and why?
With the proliferation of commercial experiment generators and custom software within cognitive psychology and the behavioral sciences, many have assumed that issues regarding millisecond timing accuracy have been largely solved. However, through empirical investigation of a variety of paradigms, we have discovered numerous sources of timing error. These can range from poor scripting practices, to incorrect timing specifications, to hardware variability. Building upon earlier research, we have developed a commercial device and associated software that enables researchers to benchmark most computer-based paradigms in situ and without modification. This gives them the opportunity to correct timing errors where practicable, increase replicability, and reduce variability by altering onset times for stimuli, by replacing inaccurate hardware, or by post hoc statistical manipulation should the source of error be constant. We outline the features of the device and accompanying software suite, stress the importance of such independent validation, and highlight typical areas that can be subject to error.
- Bates, T. C., &D’Oliveiro, L. (2003). PsyScript: A Macintosh application for scripting experiments.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,35,565–576. CrossRef
- Beringer, J. (1992). Timing accuracy of mouse response registration on the IBM microcomputer family.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,24, 486–490. CrossRef
- Chambers, C. D., &Brown, M. (2003). Timing accuracy under Microsoft Windows revealed through external chronometry.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,35,96–108. CrossRef
- De Clercq, A., Crombez, G., Buysse, A., &Roeyers, H. (2003). A simple and sensitive method to measure timing accuracy.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,35,109–115. CrossRef
- Finney, S. A. (2001). Real-time data collection in Linux: A case study.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,33,167–173. CrossRef
- Forster, K. I., &Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments,& Computers,35,116–124. CrossRef
- Hamm, J. P. (2001). Object-oriented millisecond timers for the PC.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,33,532–539. CrossRef
- MacInnes, W. J., &Taylor, T. L. (2001). Millisecond timing on PCs and Macs.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,33,174–178. CrossRef
- McKinney, C. J., MacCormac, E. R., &Welsh-Bohmer, K. A. (1999). Hardware and software for tachistoscopy: How to make accurate measurements on any PC utilizing the Microsoft Windows operating system.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31,129–136. CrossRef
- Monk, A. F. (1981). Using a VDU for tachistoscopic CRT displays.Current Psychological Reviews,1, 357–361.
- Myors, B. (1999). Timing accuracy of PC programs running under DOS and Windows.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31,322–328. CrossRef
- Plant, R. R., Hammond, N., &Whitehouse, T. (2002). Toward an experimental timing standards lab: Benchmarking precision in the real world.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,34,218–226. CrossRef
- Plant, R. R., Hammond, N., &Whitehouse, T. (2003). How choice of mouse may affect response timing in psychological studies.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,35,276–284. CrossRef
- Psychology Software Tools, Inc. (n.d.).E-Prime 1.0. See http://www.pstnet.com/e-prime/, for details on E-Prime for Windows. Surface mail: 2050 Ardmore Boulevard, Suite 200, Pittsburgh, PA 15221–4610.
- Segalowitz, S. J., &Graves, R. E. (1990). Suitability of the IBM XT, AT, and PS/2 keyboard, mouse, and game port as response devices in reaction time paradigms.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments,& Computers,22,283–289. CrossRef
- Shimizu, H. (2002). Measuring keyboard response delays by comparing keyboard and joystick inputs.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments,& Computers,34,250–256. CrossRef
- Self-validating presentation and response timing in cognitive paradigms: How and why?
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers
Volume 36, Issue 2 , pp 291-303
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors