Pacinian representations of fine surface texture
Subjects were presented with pairs of finely textured stimuli and were instructed to rate their dissimilarity, using free magnitude estimation. The subjects also rated the stimuli along each of four textural continua: roughness, hardness, stickiness, and warmth. In subsequent experimental sessions, we used a Hall effect transducer to measure the vibrations produced in the subjects’ fingertip skin as the stimuli were scanned across it. We wished to assess the extent to which the perceptual dissimilarity of the textures could be explained in terms of the perceptual dissimilarity of the vibrations they elicited in the skin. To that end, we invoked a model characterizing the Pacinian representation of a vibratory stimulus. From the model, we computed the difference in the vibratory representations of the two stimuli in each pair. We found that the bulk of the variance in perceived dissimilarity of the textures was accounted for by differences in the Pacinian representations of the vibrations they produced. Our results further suggested that the textural information conveyed by the Pacinian system concerns surface roughness and, possibly, stickiness.
- Bensmaïa, S. J., &Hollins, M. (2003). The vibrations of texture.Somatosensory & Motor Research,20, 33–43. CrossRef
- Bensmaïa, S. J., Hollins, M., &Yau, J. (2005). Vibrotactile intensity and frequency information in the Pacinian system: A psychophysical model.Perception & Psychophysics,67, 828–841. CrossRef
- Blake, D. T., Hsiao, S. S., &Johnson, K. O. (1997). Neural coding mechanisms in tactile pattern recognition: The relative contributions of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors to perceived roughness.Journal of Neuroscience,17, 7480–7489.
- Connor, C. E., Hsiao, S. S., Phillips, J. R., &Johnson, K. O. (1990). Tactile roughness: Neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates.Journal of Neuroscience,10, 3823–3836.
- Connor, C. E., &Johnson, K. O. (1992). Neural coding of tactile texture: Comparisons of spatial and temporal mechanisms for roughness perception.Journal of Neuroscience,12, 3414–3426.
- Ekman, G. (1956). Discriminal sensitivity on the subjective continuum.Acta Psychologica,12, 233–243. CrossRef
- Franzén, O. (1969). The dependence of vibrotactile threshold and magnitude functions on stimulation frequency and signal level: A perceptual and neural comparison.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,10, 289–298. CrossRef
- Gescheider, G. A. (1976). Evidence in support of the duplex theory of mechanoreception.Sensory Processes,1, 68–76.
- Hollins, M., Bensmaïa, S. J., Karlof, K., &Young, F. (2000). Individual differences in perceptual space for tactile textures: Evidence from multidimensional scaling.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 1534–1544. CrossRef
- Hollins, M., Bensmaïa, S. J., &Risner, S. R. (1998). The duplex theory of tactile texture perception. In S. Grondin & Y. Lacouture (Eds.),Fechner Day 98: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics (pp. 115–120). Quebec: International Society for Psychophysics.
- Hollins, M., Bensmaïa, S. J., &Washburn, S. (2001). Vibrotactile adaptation impairs discrimination of fine, but not coarse, textures.Somatosensory & Motor Research,18, 253–262. CrossRef
- Hollins, M., Fox, A., &Bishop, C. (2000). Imposed vibration influences perceived tactile smoothness.Perception,29, 1455–1465. CrossRef
- Hollins, M., &Risner, S. R. (2000). Evidence for the duplex theory of tactile texture perception.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 695–705. CrossRef
- Johansson, R. S., &Westling, G. (1984). Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects.Experimental Brain Research,56, 550–564. CrossRef
- Johansson, R. S., &Westling, G. (1987). Signals in tactile afferents from the fingers eliciting adaptive motor responses during precision grip.Experimental Brain Research,66, 141–154. CrossRef
- Katz, D. (1989).The world of touch (L. E. Krueger, Trans.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (Original work published 1925)
- Lederman, S. J., Loomis, J. M., &Williams, D. A. (1982). The role of vibration in the tactual perception of roughness.Perception & Psychophysics,32, 109–116. CrossRef
- Lederman, S. J., &Taylor, M. M. (1972). Fingertip force, surface geometry, and the perception of roughness by active touch.Perception & Psychophysics,12, 401–408. CrossRef
- Makous, J. C., Friedman, R. M., &Vierck, C. J. (1995). A critical band filter in touch.Journal of Neuroscience,15, 2808–2818.
- Marks, L. E. (1979). Summation of vibrotactile intensity: An analog to auditory critical bands?Sensory Processes,3, 188–203.
- Stevens, S. S. (1968). Tactile vibration: Change of exponent with frequency.Perception & Psychophysics,3, 223–228. CrossRef
- Taylor, M. M., &Lederman, S. J. (1975). Tactile roughness of grooved surfaces: A model and the effect of friction.Perception & Psychophysics,17, 23–36. CrossRef
- Verrillo, R. T. (1982). Effects of aging on the suprathreshold responses to vibration.Perception & Psychophysics,32, 61–68. CrossRef
- Verrillo, R. T., Fraioli, A. J., &Smith, R. L. (1969). Sensation magnitude of vibrotactile stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics,6, 366–372. CrossRef
- Yoshioka, T., Gibb, B., Dorsch, A. K., Hsiao, S. S., &Johnson, K. O. (2001). Neural coding mechanisms underlying perceived roughness of finely textured surfaces.Journal of Neuroscience,21, 6905–6916.
- Pacinian representations of fine surface texture
Perception & Psychophysics
Volume 67, Issue 5 , pp 842-854
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors