Memory & Cognition

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 418–429

Wishful thinking and source monitoring

Authors

    • Illinois Institute of TechnologyInstitute of Psychology
    • Department of PsychologyState University of New York
  • Jennifer Beck
    • Department of PsychologyState University of New York
Article

DOI: 10.3758/BF03193060

Cite this article as:
Gordon, R., Franklin, N. & Beck, J. Memory & Cognition (2005) 33: 418. doi:10.3758/BF03193060

Abstract

Memory distortions sometimes serve a purpose: It may be in our interest to misremember some details of an event or to forget others altogether. The present work examines whether a similar phenomenon occurs for source attribution. Given that the source of a memory provides information about the accuracy of its content, people may be biased toward source attributions that are consistent with desired accuracy. In Experiment 1, participants read desirable and undesirable predictions made by sources differing in their a priori reliability and showed awishful thinking bias—that is, a bias to attribute desirable predictions to the reliable source and undesirable predictions to the unreliable source. Experiment 2 showed that this wishful thinking effect depends on retrieval processes. Experiment 3 showed that under some circumstances, wishes concerning one event can produce systematic source memory errors for others.

Download to read the full article text

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2005