Abstract
In experimental studies of visual performance, the need often emerges to modify the stimulus according to the eye movements performed by the subject. The eye-movement-contingent display (EMCD) methodology enables accurate control of the position and motion of the stimulus on the retina. EMCD procedures have been used successfully in many areas of vision science, including studies of visual attention or eye movements and physiological characterization of neuronal response properties. Unfortunately, the difficulty of real-time programming and the unavailability of flexible and economical systems that can be easily adapted to the diversity of experimental needs and laboratory setups have prevented the widespread use of EMCD control. This article describes EyeRIS, a general-purpose system for performing EMCD experiments on a Windows computer. Based on a digital signal processor with analog and digital interfaces, this integrated hardware and software system is responsible for sampling and processing oculomotor signals and subject responses and for modifying the stimulus displayed on a CRT according to a gaze-contingent procedure specified by the experimenter. EyeRIS is designed to update the stimulus with a delay of only 10 msec. To thoroughly evaluate EyeRIS’s performance, this study was designed to (1) examine the response of the system in a number of EMCD procedures and computational benchmarking tests; (2) compare the accuracy of implementation of one particular EMCD procedure, retinal stabilization, with that produced by a standard tool used for this task; and (3) examine EyeRIS’s performance in one of the many EMCD procedures that cannot be executed by means of any other currently available device.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bertera, J. H. (1988). The effect of simulated scotomas on visual search in normal subjects.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,29, 470–475.
Chodrow, S., Jananian, F., &Donner, M. (1991). Run-time monitoring of real-time systems. InProceedings of the Twelfth International Real-Time Systems Symposium (pp. 74–83). New York: IEEE Press.
Crane, H. D., &Clark, M. R. (1978). Three-dimensional visual stimulus deflector.Applied Optics,17, 706–714.
Desbordes, G., &Rucci, M. (2004). Discrimination of briefly presented stimuli in the presence and absence of fixational eye movements [Abstract].Journal of Vision,4bl](8), 739a.
Ditchburn, R. W. (1955). Eye movements in relation to retinal action.Optica Acta,1, 171–176.
Ditchburn, R. W., &Ginsborg, B. L. (1952). Vision with a stabilized retinal image.Nature,170, 36–37.
Geisler, W. S., &Perry, J. S. (1998). Real-time foveated multiresolution system for low-bandwidth video communication. In B. E. Rogowitz & T. N. Pappas (Eds.),Human Vision and Electronic Imaging III (pp. 294–305). San Jose, CA: SPIE.
Gur, M., Beylin, A., &Snodderly, D. M. (1997). Response variability of neurons in primary visual cortex (V1) of alert monkeys.Journal of Neuroscience,17, 2914–2920.
Gur, M., &Snodderly, D. M. (1987). Studying striate cortex neurons in behaving monkeys: Benefits of image stabilization.Vision Research,27, 2081–2087.
Janabi-Sharifi, F., Hayward, V., &Chen, C.-S. J. (2000). Discretetime adaptive windowing for velocity estimation.IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology,8, 1003–1009.
Kelly, D. H. (1979). Motion and vision: I. Stabilized images of stationary gratings.Journal of the Optical Society of America,69, 1266–1274.
Leopold, D. A., &Logothetis, N. K. (1998). Microsaccades differentially modulate neural activity in the striate and extrastriate visual cortex.Experimental Brain Research,123, 341–345.
Martinez-Conde, S., Macknik, S. L., &Hubel, D. H. (2000). Microsaccadic eye movements and firing of single cells in the striate cortex of macaque monkeys.Nature Neuroscience,3, 251–258.
McConkie, G. W. (1997). Eye movement contingent display control: Personal reflections and comments.Scientific Studies of Reading,1, 303–316.
Nikolov, S. G., Newman, T. D., Bull, D. R., Canagarajah, N. C., Jones, M. G., &Gilchrist, I. D. (2004). Gaze-contingent display using texture mapping and OpenGL: System and applications. InProceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (pp. 11–18). New York: ACM.
Peli, E., &Peli, T. (1984). Image enhancement for the visually impaired.Optical Engineering,23, 47–51.
Perry, J. S., &Geisler, W. S. (2002). Gaze-contingent real-time simulation of arbitrary visual fields. In B. E. Rogowitz & T. N. Pappas (Eds.),Human Vision and Electronic Imaging VII (pp. 57–69). San Jose, CA: SPIE.
Pomplun, M., Reingold, E. M., &Shen, J. (2001a). Investigating the visual span in comparative search: The effects of task difficulty and divided attention.Cognition,81, B57-B67.
Pomplun, M., Reingold, E. M., &Shen, J. (2001b). Peripheral and parafoveal cueing and masking effects on saccadic selectivity in a gaze-contingent window paradigm.Vision Research,41, 2757–2769.
Pritchard, R. M. (1961). Stabilized images on the retina.Scientific American,204, 72–78.
Ratliff, F., &Riggs, L. A. (1950). Involuntary motions of the eye during monocular fixation.Journal of Experimental Psychology,40, 687–701.
Rayner, K. (1997). Understanding eye movements in reading.Scientific Studies of Reading,1, 317–339.
Reingold, E. M., Loschky, L. C., McConkie, G. W., &Stampe, D. M. (2003). Gaze-contingent multiresolutional displays: An integrative review.Human Factors,45, 307–328.
Riggs, L. A., &Ratliff, F. (1952). The effects of counteracting the normal movements of the eye.Journal of the Optical Society of America,42, 872–873.
Rucci, M., &Casile, A. (2005). Fixational instability and natural image statistics: Implications for early visual representations.Network,16, 121–138.
Rucci, M., &Desbordes, G. (2003). Contributions of fixational eye movements to the discrimination of briefly presented stimuli.Journal of Vision,3, 852–864.
Snodderly, D. M., Kagan, I., &Gur, M. (2001). Selective activation of visual cortex neurons by fixational eye movements: Implications for neural coding.Visual Neuroscience,18, 259–277.
Steinman, R. M., Haddad, G. M., Skavenski, A. A., &Wyman, D. (1973). Miniature eye movement.Science,181, 810–819.
Steinman, R. M., &Levinson, J. Z. (1990). The role of eye movement in the detection of contrast and spatial detail. In E. Kowler (Ed.),Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (pp. 115–212). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Tang, J., Kim, J., &Peli, E. (2004). Image enhancement in the JPEG domain for people with vision impairment.IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering,51, 2013–2023.
Toufaili, F. M., Seibel, E. J., &McIntyre, D. J. (2004). Virtual vision loss simulator.Studies in Health Technology & Informatics,98, 388–390.
Tsai, J. J. P., Bi, Y., Yang, S. J. H., &Smith, R. A. W. (1996).Distributed real-time systems: Monitoring, visualization, debugging, and analysis. New York: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This material is based on work supported by the National Institutes of Health under Grant EY15732-01. We thank Max Snodderly for his useful comments on a previous version of the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Santini, F., Redner, G., Iovin, R. et al. EyeRIS: A general-purpose system for eye-movement-contingent display control. Behavior Research Methods 39, 350–364 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193003
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193003