Abstract
The theory of mental models postulates that individuals infer that a spatial description is consistent only if they can construct a model in which all the assertions in the description are true. Individuals prefer a parsimonious representation, and so, when a description is consistent with more than one possible layout of entities on the left—right dimension, individuals in our culture prefer to construct models working from left to right. They also prefer to locate entities referred to in the same assertion as adjacent to one another in a model. And, if possible, they tend to chunk entities into a single unit in order to capture several possibilities in a single model. We report four experiments corroborating these predictions. The results shed light on the integration of relational assertions, and they show that participants exploit implicit constraints in building models of spatial relations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors.Cognition,75, 1–28.
Byrne, R. M. J., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1989). Spatial reasoning.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 564–575.
Carlson, L. A., &Covell, E. (2005). Defining functional features for spatial language. In L. A. Carlson & E. van der Zee (Eds.),Functional features in language and space (pp. 175–190). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carreiras, M., &Santamaria, C. (1997). Reasoning about relations: Spatial and nonspatial problems.Thinking & Reasoning,3, 191–208.
Chan, T. T., &Bergen, B. (2005). Writing direction influences spatial cognition. In B. Bara, L. W. Barsalou, & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.),Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 412–417). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Clark, H. H. (1969). Linguistic processes in reasoning.Psychological Review,76, 387–404.
Coventry, K. R., &Garrod, S. C. (2004).Saying, seeing, and acting: The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
De Soto, C. B., London, M., &Handel, S. (1965). Social reasoning and spatial paralogic.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,2, 513–521.
Evans, J. S. B. T., Newstead, S. E., &Byrne, R. M. J. (1993).Human reasoning: The psychology of deduction. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
Fang meier, T., Knauff, M., Ruff, C. C., &Sloutsky, V. (2006). fMRI evidence for a three-stage model of deductive reasoning.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,18, 320–334.
Garrod, S., &Pickering, M. J. (2004). Why is conversation so easy?Trends in Cognitive Sciences,8, 8–11.
Goodwin, G. P., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2005). Reasoning with relations.Psychological Review,112, 468–493.
Goodwin, G. P., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2007).Transitive and pseudotransitive inferences. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Hagert, G. (1984). Modeling mental models: Experiments in cognitive modeling of spatial reasoning. In T. O’Shea (Ed.),Advances in artificial intelligence (pp. 389–398). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., &Phillips, S. (1998). Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,21, 803–864.
Hörnig, R., Oberauer, K., &Weidenfeld, A. (2005). Two principles of premise integration in spatial reasoning.Memory & Cognition,33, 131–139.
Hörnig, R., Oberauer, K., &Weidenfeld, A. (2006). Between reasoning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,59, 1805–1825.
Hummel, J. E., &Holyoak, K. J. (2003). A symbolic-connectionist theory of relational inference and generalization.Psychological Review,110, 220–264.
Huttenlocher, J. (1968). Constructing spatial images: A strategy in reasoning.Psychological Review,75, 550–560.
Jahn, G. (2004). Three turtles in danger: Spontaneous construction of causally relevant spatial situation models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 969–987.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983).Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2006).How we reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., &Legrenzi, M. S. (2000). Illusions in reasoning about consistency.Science,288, 531–532.
Klauer, K. C., Stegmaier, R., &Meiser, T. (1997). Working memory involvement in propositional and spatial reasoning.Thinking & Reasoning,3, 9–47.
Knauff, M., Fangmeier, T., Ruff, C. C., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2003). Reasoning, models, and images: Behavioral measures and cortical activity.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,15, 1–15.
Knauff, M., Rauh, R., &Schlieder, C. (1995). Preferred mental models in qualitative spatial reasoning: A cognitive assessment of Allen’s calculus. In J. D. Moore & J. F. Lehman (Eds.),Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 200–205). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Knauff, M., Rauh, R., Schlieder, C., &Strube, G. (1998). Mental models in spatial reasoning. In C. Freksa, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.),Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1404, pp. 267–291). Berlin: Springer.
Legrenzi, P., Girotto, V., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2003). Models of consistency.Psychological Science,14, 131–137.
Miller, G., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976).Language and perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press.
Oberauer, K., Weidenfeld, A., &Hörnig, R. (2006). Working memory capacity and the construction of spatial mental models in comprehension and deductive reasoning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,59, 426–447.
O’Brien, E. J., &Albrecht, J. E. (1992). Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 777–784.
Potts, G. R., &Scholz, K. W. (1975). The internal representation of a three-term series problem.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 439–452.
Ragni, M., Fangmeier, T., Webber, L., &Knauff, M. (2006). Complexity in spatial reasoning. In R. Sun & N. Miyake (Eds.),Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1986–1991). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ragni, M., Knauff, M., &Nebel, B. (2005). A computational model for spatial reasoning with mental models. In B. Bara, L. W. Barsalou & M. Bucciarelli (Eds.),Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1064–1070). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rauh, R., Hagen, C., Knauff, M., Kuß, T., Schlieder, C., &Strube, G. (2005). From preferred to alternative mental models in spatial reasoning.Spatial Cognition & Computation,5, 239–269.
Rips, L. J. (1994).The psychology of proof. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Roberts, M. J. (2000). Strategies in relational inference.Thinking & Reasoning,6, 1–26.
Schaeken, W., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2000). Strategies in temporal reasoning.Thinking & Reasoning,6, 193–219.
Schaeken, W., Johnson-Laird, P. N., &D’Ydewalle, G. (1996). Mental models and temporal reasoning.Cognition,60, 205–234.
Schaeken, W., &van der Henst, J. B. (2005). It’s good to be wrong: An analysis of mistakes in relational reasoning. In V. Girotto & P. N. Johnson-Laird (Eds.),The shape of reason: Essays in honour of Paolo Legrenzi (pp. 51–68). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
Schaeken, W., van der Henst, J. B., &Schroyens, W. (2007). The mental models theory of relational reasoning: Premises’ relevance, conclusions’ phrasing and cognitive economy. In W. Schaeken, A. Vandierendock, W. Schroyens, & G. d’Ydewalle (Eds.),The mental models theory of reasoning: Extensions and refinements (pp. 129–150). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Spalek, T. M., &Hammad, S. (2005). The left-to-right bias in inhibition of return is due to the direction of reading.Psychological Science,16, 15–18.
Sternberg, R. J. (1981). Reasoning with determinate and indeterminate linear syllogisms.British Journal of Psychology,72, 407–420.
Taylor, H. A., &Tversky, B. (1992). Descriptions and depictions of environments.Memory & Cognition,20, 483–496.
van der Henst, J. B. (2002). Mental model theory versus the inference rule approach in relational reasoning.Thinking & Reasoning,8, 193–203.
van der Henst, J. B., &Schaeken, W. (2005). The wording of conclusions in relational reasoning.Cognition,97, 1–22.
van der Zee, E., &Watson, M. (2005). Between space and function: How spatial and functional features determine the comprehension of between. In L. A. Carlson & E. van der Zee (Eds.),Functional features in language and space (pp. 113–127). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vandierendonck, A., &De Vooght, G. (1996). Evidence for mentalmodel-based reasoning: A comparison of reasoning with time and space concepts.Thinking & Reasoning,2, 249–272.
Vandierendonck, A., &De Vooght, G. (1997). Working memory constraints on linear reasoning with spatial and temporal contents.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50A, 803–820.
Vandierendonck, A., Dierckx, V., &De Vooght, G. (2004). Mental model construction in linear reasoning: Evidence for the construction of initial annotated models.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,57A, 1369–1391.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jahn, G., Knauff, M. & Johnson-Laird, P.N. Preferred mental models in reasoning about spatial relations. Mem Cogn 35, 2075–2087 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192939
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192939