Abstract
Accuracy for a second target is reduced when it is presented within 500 msec of a first target. This phenomenon is called the attentional blink (AB). A diffused attentional state (via positive affect or an additional task) has been shown to reduce the AB, whereas a focused attentional state (via negative affect) has been shown to increase the AB, purportedly by influencing the amount of attentional investment and flexibility. In the present study, individual differences in personality traits related to positive affect, negative affect, and cognitive flexibility were used to predict individual differences in AB magnitude. As hypothesized, greater extraversion and openness predicted smaller ABs. Greater openness also predicted higher overall target accuracy. Greater neuroticism predicted larger ABs and lower overall target accuracy. Conscientiousness, associated with less cognitive flexibility, predicted lower overall target accuracy. Personality may modulate the AB by influencing overinvestment via dispositional tendencies toward more or less stringent or capable cognitive control.
Article PDF
References
Arnell, K. M., Stokes, K. A., MacLean, M. H., & Gicante, C. (2010). Executive control processes of working memory predict attentional blink magnitude over and above storage capacity. Psychological Research, 74, 1–11.
Arnell, K. M., & Stubitz, S. M. (in press). Attentional blink magnitude is predicted by the ability to keep irrelevant material out of working memory. Psychological Research.
Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529–550.
Carver, C. S., Sutton, S. K., & Scheier, M. F. (2000). Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 741–751.
Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 109–127.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1999). Temperament: A new paradigm for trait psychology. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 399–423). New York: Guilford.
Colzato, L. S., Slagter, H. A., Spapé, M. M. A., & Hommel, B. (2008). Blinks of the eye predict blinks of the mind. Neuropsychologia, 46, 3179–3183.
Colzato, L. S., Spapé, M. M. A., Pannebakker, M. M., & Hommel, B. (2007). Working memory and the attentional blink: Blink size is predicted by individual differences in operation span. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1051–1057.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992a). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality & Individual Differences, 13, 653–665.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992b). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Depue, R. A., & Collins, P. F. (1999). Neurobiology of the structure of personality: Dopamine, facilitation of incentive motivation, and extraversion. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 491–569.
Depue, R. A., Luciana, M., Arbisi, P., Collins, P. [F.], & Leon, A. (1994). Dopamine and the structure of personality: Relation of agonist-induced dopamine activity to positive emotionality. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 67, 485–498.
Di Lollo, V., Kawahara, J.-I., Ghorashi, S. M., & Enns, J. T. (2005). The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control? Psychological Research, 69, 191–200.
Dreisbach, G. (2006). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: The costs and benefits of reduced maintenance capability. Brain & Cognition, 60, 11–19.
Dux, P. E., & Marois, R. (2008). Distractor inhibition predicts individual differences in the attentional blink. PLoS ONE, 3, e3330.
Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivanitive tion in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 82, 804–818.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 313–332.
Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96.
Gross, J. J., Sutton, S. K., & Ketelaar, T. (1998). Relations between affect and personality: Support for the affect-level and affective-reactivity views. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 279–288.
Jefferies, L. N., Smilek, D., Eich, E., & Enns, J. T. (2008). Emotional valence and arousal interact in attentional control. Psychological Science, 19, 290–295.
Le Pine, J. A., Colquitt, J. A., & Erez, A. (2000). Adaptability to changing task contexts: Effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Personnel Psychology, 53, 563–593.
Lieberman, M. D. (2000). Introversion and working memory: Central executive differences. Personality & Individual Differences, 28, 479–486.
Luu, P., Collins, P., & Tucker, D. M. (2000). Mood, personality, and self-monitoring: Negative affect and emotionality in relation to frontal lobe mechanisms of error monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 43–60.
MacLean, M. H., Arnell, K. M., & Busseri, M. A. (in press). Dispositional affect predicts temporal attention costs in the attentional blink paradigm. Cognition & Emotion.
Martens, S., Munneke, J., Smid, H., & Johnson, A. (2006). Quick minds don't blink: Electrophysiological correlates of individual differences in attentional selection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1423–1438.
Martens, S., & Valchev, N. (2009). Individual differences in the attentional blink: The important role of irrelevant information. Experimental Psychology, 56, 18–26.
McLaughlin, E. N., Shore, D. I., & Klein, R. M. (2001). The attentional blink is immune to masking-induced data limits. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 169–196.
Nemanick, R. C., Jr., & Munz, D. C. (1997). Extraversion and neuroticism, trait mood, and state affect: A hierarchical relationship? Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 12, 1079–1092.
Olivers, C. N. L., & Meeter, M. (2008). A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention. Psychological Review, 115, 836–863.
Olivers, C. N. L., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2005). The beneficial effect of concurrent task-irrelevant mental activity on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 16, 265–269.
Olivers, C. N. L., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2006). The beneficial effects of additional task load, positive affect, and instruction on the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 364–379.
Pailing, P. E., & Segalowitz, S. J. (2004). The error-related negativity as a state and trait measure: Motivation, personality, and ERPs in response to errors. Psychophysiology, 41, 84–95.
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 849–860.
Rokke, P. D., Arnell, K. M., Koch, M. D., & Andrews, J. T. (2002). Dual-task attention deficits in dysphoric mood. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 370–379.
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
Taatgen, N. A., Juvina, I., Schipper, M., Borst, J. P., & Martens, S. (2009). Too much control can hurt: A threaded cognition model of the attentional blink. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 1–29.
Wacker, J., Chavanon, M.-L., & Stemmler, G. (2006). Investigating the dopaminergic basis of extraversion in humans: A multilevel approach. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 91, 171–187.
Yik, M. S. M., & Russell, J. A. (2001). Predicting the big two of affect from the big five of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 247–277.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The work reported in this article was supported by a fellowship from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) to the first author and by grants from NSERC, the Canadian Foundation for Innovation, and Ontario Innovation Trust to the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MacLean, M.H., Arnell, K.M. Personality predicts temporal attention costs in the attentional blink paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17, 556–562 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.4.556
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.4.556