Abstract
Repetition is a pervasive feature of children’s environments, and may be an important contributor to learning such complex sequential structures as language. Endress, Dehaene-Lambertz, and Mehler (2007) found that repeated tone sequences were learned more easily than sequences containing ordinal relations, but there have been no direct comparisons of repeating sequences versus sequences that contain similar, but not identical, stimuli. In Experiment 1, we compared learning from repeating tone sequences to learning from tones that varied in similarity, and confirmed that repetition is a special case for learning. In Experiment 2 we showed that the learning distinction between repeated and similar elements is not affected by whether similarity is variable. We conclude by indicating that repetition provides an important constraint on learning, and we discuss the extent to which such constraints are consistent with general-purpose statistical learning mechanisms.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altmann, G. T. M. (2002). Learning and development in neural networks— the importance of prior experience. Cognition, 85, B43-B50.
Bonatti, L. L., Peña, M., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2005). Linguistic constraints on statistical computations: The role of consonants and vowels in continuous speech processing. Psychological Science, 16, 451–459.
Botvinick, M., & Plaut, D. C. (2006). Short-term memory for serial order: A recurrent neural network model. Psychological Review, 113, 201–233.
Endress, A. D., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Mehler, J. (2007). Perceptual constraints and the learnability of simple grammars. Cognition, 105, 577–614.
Gómez, R. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13, 431–436.
Harris, R. W. (1985). Perceived relatedness of musical tones in major and minor tonal contexts. American Journal of Psychology, 98, 605–623.
Henson, R. N. A. (1998). Item repetition in short-term memory: Ranschburg repeated. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1162–1181.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 79, 2554–2558.
Kanwisher, N. G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117–143.
Kohonen, T. (1988). The “neural” phonetic typewriter. Computer, 21, 11–22.
Marcus, G. F., Vijayan, S., Rao, S. B., & Vishton, P. M. (1999). Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science, 283, 77–80.
Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (2004). Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 127–162.
Nyquist (www.cs.cmu.edu/~music/nyquist/). Retrieved May 6, 2007. Onnis, L., Christiansen, M. H., Chater, N., & Gómez, R. (2003). Reduction of uncertainty in human sequential learning: Evidence from artificial grammar learning. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Onnis, L., Monaghan, P., Richmond, K., & Chater, N. (2005). Phonology impacts segmentation in online speech processing. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 225–237.
Papousek, M., Papousek, H., & Haekel, M. (1987). Didactic adjustments in fathers’ and mothers’ speech to their 3-month-old infants. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 491–516.
Peña, M., Bonatti, L. L., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (2002). Signaldriven computations in speech processing. Science, 298, 604–607.
Pothos, E. M., & Bailey, T. M. (2000). The importance of similarity in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 847–862.
Saffran, J. R. (2003). Statistical language learning: Mechanisms and constraints. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 110–114.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Monaghan, P., Rowson, C. The effect of repetition and similarity on sequence learning. Memory & Cognition 36, 1509–1514 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.8.1509
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.8.1509