Abstract
Some theories of visuospatial attention propose that attention can be divided between separated zones of space that exclude the intervening region, whereas other theories state that the focus of attention must encompass aunitary, continuous zone. These contrasting viewswere evaluated in an experiment 9n which subjects were required to monitor two of four stimulus locations for targets; the two relevant locations were adjacent in one condition and were separated by an intervening irrelevant location in a second condition . To assess the distribution of attention across the relevant and irrelevant locations, event-related brain potentials(ERPa)were recorded to taskirrelevant “probe” stimuli that were occasionally presented at the individual stimulus locations. When the relevant locations were adjacent, probes presented at irrelevant locations elicited smaller sensory-evoked electrophysiological responses than probes presented at relevant locations, consistent with an attentional suppression of inputs from the unattended locations. When the relevant locations were separated by an irrelevant location, however, the sensory responses evoked by probes presented at this intervening irrelevant location were not suppressed, and target detection performance became slower and less accurate. These results suggest that attentionforms a unitary zone that may expand to encompass multiple relevant locations but must also include the area between them; as a result, irrelevant information arising from intervening locations is not suppressed and perceptual processing is compromised.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beck, J., &Ambler, B. (1973). The effects of concentrated and distributed attention on peripheral acuity.Perception& Psychophysics,14, 225–230.
Castiello, U., &Umilta, C. (1990). Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing.Acta Psychologica,73, 195–209.
Casttello, D., &Umilta, C. (1992). Splitting focal attention.Journal Of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 837–848.
Downing, C. J., &Pinker, S. (1985). The Spatial structure of visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. Marin (Eds),Attention and performance XI (pp. 171–187). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
Eason, R. G. (1981). Visual evoked potential correlates of early neural filtering during selective attention.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,18, 203–206.
Egly, R., &Homa, D. (1984) Sensitization of tbe visual field.Journal Of Experimental Psychotogy: Human Perception & Performance,10, 778–793.
Eriksen, C. W., &St James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention. A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 225–240
Eriksen, C. W., &Webb, J. M. (989). Shifting of attentional focus Within and about a visual display.Perception& Psychophysics,45, 175–183.
Eriksen, C.W, Yeh, Y. (1985). Allccanon of attention In the visual Field.Journal of Expenmental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 583–597.
Harter, MR., Aine, C, &Schroeder, C. (1982) Hemispheric differences in the neural processing of stimulus location and type. Effects of selective attennon on visual evoked potentials.Neuropsychologia,20, 421–438.
Hawkins, H. L, Hillyard, S. A., Luck, S J, Mouloua, M., Downing, C. J., &Woodward, D. P. (1990). Visual attention modu lares signal detectability.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,16, 802–811
Heinze, H. J., Luck, S. J, Mangun, G. R., &Hillyard, S. A. (1990) Visual event-related potennals index focused attention within bilateral surnulus arrays I Evidence for earlv selection.Electroencephalography & Cliracal Neurophysiology,75, 511–527
Heinze, H. J., Mangun, GR., &Hillyard, S. A. (1990) Visual event-related potentials index perceptual accuracy during attention to bilateral stimuli. In C. Brunia, A Gaillard, A, Kok, G. Mulder, & M Verbaten (Eds ).Psychophysiological brain research (pp. 196–202). Tilburg, the Netherlands. Tilburg University Press.
Hillyard, S. A., &Munte, T. F. (1984) Selective attention to color and location An analysis With event-related brain potentials.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 185–198
Hillyard, SA., &Picton, T. W. (1987). Electrophysiology of cognition In F. Plum (Ed).Handbook of physiological Vol 5. pp 519–584). Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society
Hoffman, J. E. &Nelson, B. (1981) Spatial selectivity In visual Search.Perception & Psychophvsics,30, 283–290
Hughes, H C., &Zimba, L. D. (1987) Natural boundaries for the spatial spread of directed visual attention.Neuropsychologia,25, 5–18
Laberge, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,9, 371–379.
Laberge, D., &Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification.Psychological Review,96, 101–124.
Luck, S. J., Heinze, H. J. Mangun, G. R., &Hillyard, S. A. (1990) Visual event-related potentials index focused attention Within Bilateral stimulus arrays: II. Functional dissociation of PI and N1 components.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,75, 528–542.
Luck, S. J ., & Hillyard, S. A. (in press). The role of attention in feature detection and conjunction discrimination, An electrophysiological analysis.International Journal of Neuroscience.
Luck, S. J., Hillyard, S. A., Mouloua, M, Woldorff, M. G. Clark, V. P., & Hawkins, H. L. (in press). Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectaotlity: Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance
Mangun, G. R., &Hillyard, S. A. (1987). The spatial allocation of visual attention a, indexed by event-related brain potentials.Human Factors,29, 195–211.
Mangun, G. R., &Hillyard, S A. (1988). Spatialgradients of visual attention: Behavioral and electrophysiologrcal evidence.Electroencephalography & Climcal Neurophysiology,70, 417–428.
Mangun, GR., &Hillyard, S. A. (1990a) Allocation of Visual attention to spatial locations Tradeoff functions for event-related brain potentials and detection performance.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 532–550.
Mangun, G. R., &Hillyard, S. A. (1990b). Electrophysiological studies of visual selective attention in humans In A. B. Scheibel & A. F. Wechsler (Eds.,Neurobiology of higher cognitive function (pp 271–295). New York: Guilford
Mangun, G. R., &Hillyard, S. A. (l99l) Modulations of sensoryevoked brain potenuals indreate changes in perceptual proeessmg during visual-spatial priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,17, 1057–1074.
Mangun, G. R., Hillyard, S. A., &Luck, S. J. (1993) Electrocortical substrates of visual selective attention In D. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds).Attention and performance XIV (pp 219–243). Cambridge, MA MIT Press
Murphy, T D., &Eriksen, C. W. (1987). Temporal changes in the Distribution of attention In the visual field in response to precues.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 576–586.
Náátanen, R (1992)Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum.
Neville, H. J., &Lawson, D. (1987). Attention to central and peripheral Visual space in a movement detection task I Normal hearing adults.Bram Research,405, 253–267
Pan, K., &Eiuksen, C. W. (1993). Attentional distribution in the Visual field during same-different Judgments as assessed by response competition.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 134–144
Punier, J., Perrin, F., &Bertrand, 0. (1988). Scalp current density fields: Concept and properties.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,69, 385–389.
Perrin, F., Pernier, J, Bertrand, 0., &Echaliier, L. F. (1989) Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping.Electroencephalography & Cloucal NeurophysIology,12, 184–187.
Podgorny, P., &Shepard, R. N. (1983). Distribution attention over space.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,9, 380–393.
Posner, M. I., &Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human bram.Annual Review of Neuroscience,13, 25–42.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., &Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 160–174.
Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L, Dascola, I., &Umilta, C. (1987). Reorienting Attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention.Neuropsychologia,25, 31–40.
Sagi, D., &Julesz, B. (1985). Fast noninertial shifts of attention.Spatial Vision,1, 141–149.
Sagi, D., &Julesz, B. (1986). Enhanced detection in the aperture of focal attention during Simple discrimination tasks.Nature,321, 693–695.
Shaw, M. L. (1978). A capacity allocation model for reliction tilte.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception& Performance,4, 586–598.
Shaw, M. L., &Shaw, P. (1977). Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 201–211.
Shulman, G. L., Remington, R. W., &Mclean, J. P. (1979) Moving attention through Visual space.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 522–526.
Shulman, G. L., Sheehy, J. B., &Wilson, J. (1986). Gradients of spatial attention.Acta Psychologica,61, 167–181.
Shulman, G. L., Wilson, J., &Sheehy, J. B. (l985). Spatial determmants of the distribution of attention.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 59–65.
Simpson, G V, Scherg, M., Ritter, W., &Vaughan, H. G., Jr. (1990) Localization and temporal activity functions of brain sources Generating the human visual ERP In C Brunia, A. Gaillard, A. Kok, G. Mulder., & M. Verbaten (Eds),Psychopbysiological; brain research (pp. 99–105). Tilburg, The Netherlands Tilburg University Press.
Tsal, Y. (1983). Movements of attention across the Visual field.Journal Of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance.9, 523–530.
Van Der Heuden, A H. C. (1992)Selective attention in vision. London Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by ONR Contract N0001489-)-1806 and by grants from the DFG, NIMH (MH-25594), MH (NS-17778), and the Human Frontier Science Program.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heinze, HJ., Luck, S.J., Munte, T.F. et al. Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space: An electrophysiological analysis. Perception & Psychophysics 56, 42–52 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211689
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211689