Abstract
Three experiments were carried out to investigate the spatial properties of auditory attention. If auditory spatial information is represented analogically, then shifts of auditory attention should be constrained by the spatial structure of the representation. In particular, the time taken to shift auditory attention should increase with the distance moved. As predicted, the time for attention shifts was a linearly increasing function of the angular distance moved, for distances up to 90°. Moreover, the rate at which attention was shifted appeared to depend on the capacity available, which in turn depended on task difficulty (Experiment 1 vs. Experiment 2) and memory load (Experiment 3). Explanations based on general expectancies or response priming were ruled out. The results suggest that auditory spatial information, like visual spatial information, is represented analogically, and that this structure constrains the way that attention can be moved within the representation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bregman, A S (1978). The formation of auditory streams. In J Requin (Ed),Attention and performance VII Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum
Bregman, A. S (1981) Asking the what-for question in auditory perception In M. Kubovy & J R. Pornerantz (Eds),Perceptual organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bregman, A S, &Campbell, J (1971) Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid.sequences of tonesJournal of Experimental Psychology,89, 244–249
Bregman, A. S., &Rudnicky, A I (1975). Auditory stream segregation Stream or streams?Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,1, 263–267
Briggs, R M, &Perroti, D. R. (1972) Auditory apparent movement under dichotic listening conditions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,92, 83–91.
Carpenter, P A, &Eisenberg, P (1978). Mental rotation and frame of reference in blind and sighted individualsPerception & Psychophysics,23, 117–124
Cooper, L A., &Shepard, R N (1973a) Chronometrie studies of the rotation of mental images. In Wr. G Chase (Ed),Visual information processing New York Academic Press
Cooper, L- A. &Shepard, R N (1973b) The time required to prepare for a rotated stimulusMemory & Cognition,1, 246–250
Downing, C. J., &Pinker, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention In M I Posner, & O. S M. Mann (Eds),Attention and performance XI. Hillsdale, NJ. Erlbaum.
Drager, U. C., &Hijbel, D. H. (1975). Responses to visual stimulation and relationship between visual, auditory and somatosensory inputs in mouse superior colliculusJournal of Neurophysiology,38, 690–713.
Knudsen, E. I. (1982) Auditory and visual maps of space in the optic tectum of the owl.The Journal of Neuroscience,2, 1177–1194.
Knudsen, E I. (1984). Synthesis of a neural map of auditory space in the owl. In G. M. Edelman, W. M. Cowan, & W. E. Gall (Eds.),Dynamic aspects of neocortical function. New York Wiley
Korte, A. (1915). Kinematoscopische Untersuchungen.Zeitschrifi für Psychologie der Sinnesorgane,72, 193–296
Kubovy, M. (1981). Concurrent-pitch segregation and the theory of indispensable attributes. In M Kubovy & J R. Pornerantz (Eds),Perceptual organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lansman, M., Farr, S., &Hunt, E (1984). Expectancy and dual task interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,10, 195–204
Marcel, T., &Forrin, B. (1974). Naming latency and the repetition of stimulus categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology,103, 450–460.
Marmor, G. S, &Zaback, L. A (1976). Mental rotation by the blind: Does mental rotation depend on visual imagery?Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,2, 515–521
Marr, D. (1982) Vision San Francisco: W H. Freeman. Mills, A W. (1958) On the minimum audible angle.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,30, 237–246.
Mills, A W (1972). Auditory localization. In J V. Tobias (Ed),Foundations of modern auditory theory (Vol 2). New York: Academic Press.
O’leary, A, &Rhodes, G. (1984). Cross-modal effects on visual and auditory object perceptionPerception & Psychophysics,35, 565–569
Palmer, A. R., &King, A J. (1982) The representation of auditory space in the mammalian superior colliculus.Nature,299, 248–249.
Posner, M. I. (1978).Chronometrie explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C R. R., &Davidson, B J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology. General,109, 160–174.
Shepard, R. N. (1981) Psychophysical complementarity. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pornerantz (Eds),Perceptual organization. Hillsdale, NJ. Erlbaum.
Shepard, R N., &Cooper, L. A. (1982).Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Shepard, R. N, &Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of threedimensional objects.Science,171, 701–703.
Shepard, R. N, &Zare, S L (1983). Path-guided apparent motionScience,220, 632–634
Shulman, G L., Remington, R. W., &McLean, J P. (1979). Moving attention through visual space.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,5, 522–526.
Stevens, S. S, &Newman, E B. (1936). The localization of actual sources of sound.American Journal of Psychology,48, 297–306.
Tsai, Y. (1983). Movements of attention across the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,9, 523–530.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by NSF Grant BNS 80-05517 to Roger Shepard.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rhodes, G. Auditory attention and the representation of spatial information. Perception & Psychophysics 42, 1–14 (1987). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211508
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211508