Abstract
Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded while 14 males and 14 females read sentences containing a reflexive pronoun that referred to a definitionally or stereotypically male or female antecedent noun. Pronouns that disagreed with the gender definition or gender stereotype of the antecedent elicited a large-amplitude positive wave. Violations of gender definitions elicited a larger positive wave than did violations of gender stereotypes. Furthermore, the positive wave elicited by stereotype violations persisted even when subjects judged these sentences to be acceptable. Finally, female subjects exhibited larger positivities than did male subjects, regardless of whether the gender mismatch involved a definitional or stereotypical antecedent. These results are taken to indicate that ERPs are sensitive to violations of gender-based occupational stereotypes and that the ERP response to stereotype violations is similar to the P600 effect elicited by a variety of syntactic anomalies.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banaji, M. R., &Greenwald, A. G. (1995). Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,68, 181–198.
Banaji, M. R., &Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping.Psychological Science,7, 136–141.
Banaji, M. R., Hardin, C., &Rothman, A. J. (1993). Implicit stereotyping in person judgment.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,65, 272–281.
Brigham, J. C. (1971). Ethnic stereotypes.Psychological Bulletin,76, 15–38.
Cacioppo, J. T., Crites, S. L., Bernston, G. G., &Coles, M. G. H. (1993). If attitudes affect how stimuli are processed, should they not affect the event-related brain potential?Psychological Science,4, 108–112.
Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 335–359.
Cleveland, J. N., &Landy, F. J. (1983). The effects of person and job stereotypes on two personnel decisions.Journal of Applied Psychology,68, 609–619.
Connine, C., Ferreira, F., Jones, C., Clifton, C., &Frazier, L. (1984). Verb frame preferences: Descriptive norms.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,13, 307–319.
Coulson, S., King, J., & Kutas, M. (1995, March).The late show: The syntactic positive shift meets the late positive component. Poster presented at the Eighth Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing.
Dawes, R. M., &Smith, T. L. (1985). Attitude and opinion measurement. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),Handbook of social psychology: Vol. 1: Theory and method (pp. 509–566). New York: Random House.
Donchin, E. (1981). Surprise!. . . Surprise?Psychophysiology,18, 493–513.
Duncan-Johnson, C. C., &Donchin, E. (1977). On quantifying surprise: The variation in event-related potentials with subjective probability.Psychophysiology,14, 456–467.
Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., &Harold, R. (1990). Gender-role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents’ role in the socialization of gender differences in self-perceptions and skill acquisition.Journal of Social Issues,46, 182–201.
Fairweather, H. (1976). Sex differences in cognition.Cognition,4, 231–280.
Friederici, A. D. (1995). The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data.Brain & Language,50, 259–281.
Greenhouse, S., &Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data.Psychometrika,24, 95–112.
Greenwald, A. G., &Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes.Psychological Review,102, 4–27.
Gunter, T. C., Vos, S. H., & Mulder, G. (1995, March).Syntactic violations and ERPs: P600 or P3b? Poster presented at the Eighth Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing.
Haegeman, L. (1991).Introduction to government and binding theory. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.
Hagoort, P., Brown, C., &Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift as an ERP measure of syntactic processing.Language & Cognitive Processes,8, 337–364.
Heilman, M. E., Martell, R. F., &Simon, M. C. (1988). The vagaries of sex bias: Conditions regulating the underevaluation, equivocation, and overvaluation of female job applicants.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes,41, 98–110.
Hillyard, S. A., &Picton, T. W. (1987). Electrophysiology of cognition. In F. Plum (Ed.),Handbook of physiology: Section 1. Neurophysiology (pp. 519–584). New York: New York Physiological Society.
Holmes, V., Stowe, L., &Cupples, L. (1989). Lexical expectations in parsing complement-verb sentences.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 668–689.
Jacobs, J. E. (1992). The influence of gender stereotypes on parent and child math attitudes.Journal of Educational Psychology,83, 518–527.
Jacobs, J. E., &Eccles, J. S. (1992). The impact of mothers’ genderrole stereotypic beliefs on mothers’ and children’s ability perceptions.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,63, 932–944.
Jasper, H. H. (1958). Report to the committee on methods of clinical examination in electroencephalography: Appendix.The ten-twenty system of the International Foundation. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,10, 371–375.
Jessell, J. C., &Beymer, L. (1992). The effects of job title vs. job description on occupational sex typing.Sex Roles,27, 73–83.
Johnson, R., Jr. (1993). On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related brain potential.Psychophysiology,30, 90–97.
Judd, C. M., &Park, B. (1993). Definition and assessment of accuracy in social stereotypes.Psychological Review,100, 109–128.
Keppel, G. (1982).Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kutas, M., &Hillyard, S. A. (1980a). Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words.Biological Psychology,11, 99–116.
Kutas, M., &Hillyard, S. A. (1980b). Reading between the lines: Event-related brain potentials during natural sentence processing.Brain & Language,11, 354–373.
Kutas, M., &Hillyard, S. A. (1980c). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.Science,207, 203–205.
Kutas, M., &Van Petten, C. K. (1994). Psycholinguistics electrified: Event-related brain potential investigations. In M. A. Gernsbacher,Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 83–143). San Diego: Academic Press.
McCarthy, G., &Wood, C. C. (1985). Scalp distributions of eventrelated potentials: An ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,62, 203–208.
McCauley, C., Stitt, C. L., &Segal, M. (1980). Stereotyping: From prejudice to prediction.Psychological Bulletin,87, 195–208.
Münte, T. F., Heinze, H., &Mangun, G. R. (1993). Dissociation of brain activity related to syntactic and semantic aspects of language.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,5, 335–344.
Neville, H. J., Nicol, J. L., Barss, A., Forster, K. I., &Garrett, M. F. (1991). Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,3, 151–165.
Osterhout, L. (1990).Event-related brain potentials elicited during sentence comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tufts University.
Osterhout, L. (1994). Event-related brain potentials as tools for comprehending language comprehension. In C. Clifton, Jr., L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.),Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 15–44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Osterhout, L. (in press). On the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Manipulations of word position and word class reveal individual differences.Brain & Language.
Osterhout, L., &Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly.Journal of Memory & Language,31, 785–806.
Osterhout, L., &Holcomb, P. J. (1993). Event-related potentials and syntactic anomaly: Evidence of anomaly detection during the perception of continuous speech.Language & Cognitive Processes,8, 413–438.
Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P. J., &Swinney, D. A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 786–803.
Osterhout, L., McKinnon, R., Bersick, M., &Corey, V. (1996). On the language-specificity of the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Is the syntactic positive shift a member of the P300 family?Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,8, 507–526.
Osterhout, L., &Mobley, L. A. (1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 739–773.
Osterhout, L., & Nicol, J. (1996).On the distinctiveness, independence, and temporal course of the brain responses to syntactic and pragmatic anomalies. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Rosenberg, B. G., &Sutton-Smith, B. (1969). Sibling age spacing effects upon cognition.Developmental Psychology,1, 661–668.
Rösler, F., Friederici, A., Pütz, P., &Hahne, A. (1993). Event-related brain potentials while encountering semantic and syntactic constraint violations.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,5, 345–362.
Rudman, L. A. (1996).Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Manuscript in preparation.
Rugg, M. D., &Coles, M. G. H. (1995).Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sutton, S., &Ruchkin, D. S. (1984). The late positive complex: Advances and new problems. In R. Karrer, J. Cohen, & P. Tueting (Eds.),Brain and information: Event-related potentials (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 425, pp. 1–23). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., &Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudice.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,68, 199–214.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research received financial support from Grant R29 DC01947 from the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Osterhout, L., Bersick, M. & Mclaughlin, J. Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes. Memory & Cognition 25, 273–285 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211283
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211283