Abstract
Mice from the early 1990s seemed to offer a cheap and viable alternative to more expensive response boxes, with fairly consistent results being found between studies. However, has anything changed in the intervening decade? Are newer mice technologies necessarily better? Is USB a better mouse interface than the old-fashioned serial interface? With such questions in mind, we outline a method for bench-testing the timing characteristics of mice outside of a PC, in order to predict their contribution to response timing. A sample set of mice was testedunder a visual stimulus—response paradigm, using E-Prime to compare predicted performance with measured response registration. A representative range of mice technologies was tested alongside a standard keyboard and an E-Prime deluxe response box. The implications for using any response device other than a recognized response box are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beringer, J. (1992). Timing accuracy of mouse response registration on the IBM microcomputer family.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,24, 486–490.
Crosbie, J. (1990). The Microsoft mouse as a multipurpose response device for the IBM PC/XT/AT.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,22, 305–316.
MacInnes, W. J., &Taylor, T. L. (2001). Millisecond timing on PCs and Macs.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,33, 174–178.
Myors, B. (1998). A simple graphical technique for assessing timer accuracy of computer systems.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,30, 454–456.
Myors, B. (1999). Timing accuracy of PC programs running under DOS and Windows.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 322–328.
Plant, R. R., Hammond, N., &Whitehouse, T. (2002). Toward an Experimental Timing Standards Lab: Benchmarking precision in the real world.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,34, 218–226.
Segalowitz, S. J., &Graves, R. E. (1990). Suitability of the IBM XT, AT, and PS/2 keyboard, mouse, and game port as response devices in reaction time paradigms.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,22, 283–289.
Ulrich, R., &Giray, M. (1989). Time resolution of clocks: Effects on reaction time measurement—good news for bad clocks.British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology,42, 1–12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The Experimental Timing Standards Laboratory project was funded by Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Grant GR/N38350/01.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Plant, R.R., Hammond, N. & Whitehouse, T. How choice of mouse may affect response timing in psychological studies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 35, 276–284 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202553
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202553