Abstract
High and low working memory (WM) capacity individuals performed the serial reaction time task under both incidental and intentional learning conditions to determine the role of WM capacity in the learning of sequential information. WM capacity differences emerged in conditions of intentional but not incidental learning, indicating that individual differences in WM capacity occur in tasks requiring some form of control, with little difference appearing on tasks that required relatively automatic processing. Furthermore, an index of learning was significantly related to a measure of general fluid intelligence under intentional conditions only. Thus, the degree of learning was significantly related to higher order cognition, but only when intentional processing was emphasized.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A. [D.] (1986).Working memory. London: Oxford University Press.
Buchner, A., &Wippich, W. (1998). Differences and commonalities between implicit learning and implicit memory. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.),Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 3–46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cohen, A., Ivry, R., &Keele, S. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 17–30.
Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., &Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 331–335.
Conway, A. R. A., &Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 354–373.
Conway, A. R. A., Tuholski, S. W., Shisler, R. J., &Engle, R. W. (1999). The effect of memory load on negative priming: An individual differences investigation.Memory & Cognition,27, 1042–1050.
Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human informationprocessing system.Psychological Bulletin,104, 163–191.
Cowan, N. (1995).Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Curran, T., &Keele, S. W. (1993). Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 189–202.
Engle, R. W. (2001). What is working memory capacity? In H. L. Roediger III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. M. Surprenant (Eds.),The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 297–314). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Engle, R. W., &Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In B. Ross (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 44, pp. 145–199). New York: Elsevier.
Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., &Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,128, 309–331.
Feldman, J., Kerr, B., &Streissguth, A. P. (1995). Correlational analyses of procedural and declarative learning performance.Intelligence,20, 87–114.
Frensch, P. A., &Miner, C. S. (1994). Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning.Memory & Cognition,22, 95–110.
Frensch, P. A., Wenke, D., &Rünger, D. (1999). A secondary tonecounting task suppresses expression of knowledge in the serial reaction task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 260–274.
Heitz, R. P., Unsworth, N., &Engle, R. W. (2004). Working memory capacity, attention control, and fluid intelligence. In O. Wilhelm & R.W. Engle (Eds.),Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence (pp. 61–77). New York: Sage.
Howard, D. V., &Howard, J. H., Jr. (2001). When itdoes hurt to try: Adult age differences in the effects of instructions on implicit pattern learning.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 798–805.
Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory.Psychological Review,99, 122–149.
Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., &Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 169–183.
Kane, M. J., &Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,132, 47–70.
Klein, K., &Fiss, W. H. (1999). The reliability and stability of the Turner and Engle working memory task.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 429–432.
Kyllonen, P. C., &Stephens, D. L. (1990). Cognitive abilities as determinants of success in acquiring logic skill.Learning & Individual Differences,2, 129–160.
Nissen, M. J., &Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures.Cognitive Psychology,19, 1–32.
Oberauer, K. (in press). Age differences and individual differences in cognitive functions. In R.W. Engle, G. Sedek, U. von Hecker, & D. N. McIntosh (Eds.),Cognitive limitations in aging and psychopathology: Attention, working memory, and executive functions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rosen, V. M., &Engle, R. W. (1997). The role of working memory capacity in retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 211–227.
Salthouse, T. A., McGuthry, K. E., &Hambrick, D. Z. (1999). A framework for analyzing and interpreting differential aging patterns: Application to three measures of implicit learning.Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition,6, 1–18.
Schneider, W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review,84, 1–66.
Seger, C. A. (1994). Implicit learning.Psychological Bulletin,115, 163–196.
Seger, C. A. (1997). Two forms of sequential implicit learning.Consciousness & Cognition,6, 108–131.
Shanks, D. R. (2003). Attention and awareness in “implicit” sequence learning. In L. Jiménez (Ed.),Attention and implicit learning (pp. 11–42). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Shute, V. J. (1991). Who is likely to acquire programming skills?Journal of Educational Computing Research,7, 1–24.
Stadler, M. A. (1995). Role of attention in implicit learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 674–685.
Stadler, M. A., &Roediger, H. L. III (1998). The question of awareness in research on implicit learning. In M. A. Stadler & P. A. Frensch (Eds.),Handbook of implicit learning (pp. 47–104). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tuholski, S. W., Engle, R. W., &Baylis, G. C. (2001). Individual differences in working memory capacity and enumeration.Memory & Cognition,29, 484–492.
Turner, M. L., &Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory & Language,28, 127–154.
Unsworth, N., Schrock, J. C., &Engle, R. W. (2004). Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: Individual differences in voluntary saccade control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 1302–1321.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
This work was supported by Grant F49620-00-1-131 from the Air Force Office of Scientific Research.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Unsworth, N., Engle, R.W. Individual differences in working memory capacity and learning: Evidence from the serial reaction time task. Mem Cogn 33, 213–220 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195310
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195310