Abstract
Monitoring one’s knowledge during study is susceptible to aforesight bias (Koriat & Bjork, 2005). Judgments of learning (JOLs) are inflated whenever information that is present at study and absent, but solicited, at test, such as the targets in cue-target paired associates, highlights aspects of cues that are less apparent when those cues are presented alone. The present findings demonstrate that foresight bias can be alleviated by study-test experience (Experiment 1), particularly test experience (Experiments 2 and 3), and by delaying JOLs after study (Experiment 4) and that both foresight bias and its alleviation have behavioral consequences, as measured by study time allocation (Experiment 5). Collectively, the findings suggest that overconfidence and misallocation of study time arise from a mismatch that is inherent to education—that the answer is present at study and absent at test—and that alleviating the problem requires creating conditions at study that sensitize learners to retrieval conditions at test.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Begg, I., Duft, S., Lalonde, P., Melnick, R., &Sanvito, J. (1989). Memory predictions are based on ease of processing.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 610–632.
Benjamin, A. S. (2003). Predicting and postdicting the effects of word frequency on memory.Memory & Cognition,31, 297–305.
Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., &Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 55–68.
Birch, S. A. J., &Bloom, P. (2003). Children are cursed: An asymmetric bias in mental-state attribution.Psychological Science,14, 283–286.
Breznitz, S., &Ben-Dov, G. (1991).Norms for word associations in Hebrew. Haifa: University of Haifa.
Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., &Weber, M. (1989). The curse of knowledge in economic settings: An experimental analysis.Journal of Political Economy,97, 1232–1254.
Carroll, M., Nelson, T. O., &Kirwan, A. (1997). Tradeoff of semantic relatedness and degree of overlearning: Differential effects on metamemory and on long-term retention.Acta Psychologica,95, 239–253.
Connor, L. T., Dunlosky, J., &Hertzog, C. (1997). Age-related differences in absolute but not relative metamemory accuracy.Psychology & Aging,12, 50–71.
Dunlosky, J., &Matvey, G. (2001). Empirical analysis of the intrinsic-extrinsic distinction of judgments of learning (JOLs): Effects of relatedness and serial position on JOLs.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 1180–1191.
Dunlosky, J., &Nelson, T. O. (1992). Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect.Memory & Cognition,20, 374–380.
Dunlosky, J., &Nelson, T. O. (1994). Does the sensitivity of judgments of learning (JOLs) to the effects of various study activities depend on when the JOLs occur?Journal of Memory & Language,33, 545–565.
Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., &Kruger, J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence.Current Directions in Psychological Science,12, 83–87.
Groninger, L. D. (1979). Predicting recall: The “feeling-that-I-willknow” phenomenon.American Journal of Psychology,92, 45–58.
Guttentag, R., &Carroll, D. (1998). Memorability judgments for high- and low-frequency words.Memory & Cognition,26, 951–958.
Hertzog, C., Dunlosky, J., Robinson, A. E., &Kidder, D. P. (2003). Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 22–34.
Keysar, B., &Henly, A. S. (2002). Speakers’ overestimation of their effectiveness.Psychological Science,13, 207–212.
Kimball, D. R., &Metcalfe, J. (2003). Delaying judgments of learning affects memory, not metamemory.Memory & Cognition,31, 918–929.
King, J. F., Zechmeister, E. B., &Shaughnessy, J. J. (1980). Judgments of knowing: The influence of retrieval practice.American Journal of Psychology,93, 329–343.
Koriat, A. (1981). Semantic facilitation in lexical decision as a function of prime-target association.Memory & Cognition,9, 587–598.
Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 349–370.
Koriat, A. (2000). The feeling of knowing: Some metatheoretical implications for consciousness and control.Consciousness & Cognition,9, 149–171.
Koriat, A., &Bjork, R. A. (2005). Illusions of competence in monitoring one’s knowledge during study.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,31, 187–194.
Koriat, A., &Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy.Psychological Review,103, 490–517.
Koriat, A., &Ma’ayan, H. (2005). The effects of encoding fluency and retrieval fluency on judgments of learning.Journal of Memory & Language,52, 478–492.
Koriat, A., Sheffer, L., &Ma’ayan, H. (2002). Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: Judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,131, 147–162.
Koriat, A., &Shitzer-Reichert, R. (2002). Metacognitive judgments and their accuracy: Insights from the processes underlying judgments of learning in children. In P. Chambres, M. Izaute, & P.-J. Marescaux (Eds.),Metacognition: Process, function, and use (pp. 1–17). New York: Kluwer.
Leonesio, R. J., &Nelson, T. O. (1990). Do different metamemory judgments tap the same underlying aspects of memory?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 464–470.
Lovelace, E. A. (1984). Metamemory: Monitoring future recallability during study.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 756–766.
Mazzoni, G., &Cornoldi, C. (1993). Strategies in study time allocation: Why is study time sometimes not effective?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 47–60.
Metcalfe, J. (1998). Cognitive optimism: Self-deception or memorybased processing heuristics?Personality & Social Psychology Review,2, 100–110.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998).The University of South Florida word association, rhyme and word fragment norms. Available at w3.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/Intro.html.
Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions.Psychological Bulletin,95, 109–133.
Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition.American Psychologist,51, 102–116.
Nelson, T. O., &Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people’s judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The “delayed-JOL effect.”Psychological Science,2, 267–270.
Nelson, T. O., &Leonesio, R. J. (1988). Allocation of self-paced study time and the “labor-in-vain effect.”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 676–686.
Nelson, T. O., &Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 26, pp. 125–173). San Diego: Academic Press.
Nelson, T. O., Narens, L., &Dunlosky, J. (2004). A revised methodology for research on metamemory: Pre-judgment recall and monitoring (PRAM).Psychological Methods,9, 53–69.
Newton, L. (1990).Overconfidence in the communication of intent: Heard and unheard melodies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
Pronin, E., Puccio, C., &Ross, L. (2002). Understanding misunderstanding: Social psychological perspectives. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.),Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 636–665). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rubinsten, O., Anaki, D., Henik, A., Drori, S., &Faran, Y. (2005). Norms for free associations in the Hebrew language. In A. Henik O. Rubinsten & D. Anaki (Eds.),Word norms for the Hebrew language [in Hebrew] (pp. 17–34). Beer-Sheva: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.
Son, L. K., &Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 204–221.
Spellman, B. A., &Bjork, R. A. (1992). Technical commentary: When predictions create reality: Judgments of learning may alter what they are intended to assess.Psychological Science,3, 315–316.
Weaver, C. A., III, &Kelemen, W. L. (2003). Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: Evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 1058–1065.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by a grant from the United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF), Jerusalem, Israel.
Note—This article was accepted by the previous editorial team, when Colin M. MacLeod was Editor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koriat, A., Bjork, R.A. Illusions of competence during study can be remedied by manipulations that enhance learners’ sensitivity to retrieval conditions at test. Memory & Cognition 34, 959–972 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193244
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193244