Skip to main content
Log in

A Guide to the medical literature. Methods and support software for evidence-based medical technology

  • Published:
Scientific and Technical Information Processing Aims and scope

Abstract

This paper presents a multifunctional support system for evidence-based medical technology that permits medical publications and reference information to be searched for in external information resources, makes it possible to formulate questions in medically accepted formats and to perform a critical analysis of publications according to the principles of evidence-based medicine, enables clinical and statistical calculators to be used, and permits answers to clinical questions to be automatically formed and archived. The system has been tested at a multi-profile hospital and demonstrated efficiency in clinical decision-making support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Timpka, T. and Arborelius, E., The GP’s dilemmas: A study of knowledge need and use during health care consultations, Methods Inform. Med., 1990, vol. 29, pp. 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bergus, G.R., Randall, C.S., Sinift, S.D., and Rosenthal, D.M., Does the structure of clinical questions affect the outcome of curbside consultations with specialty colleagues?, Arch. Family Med., 2000, vol. 9, pp. 541–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ely, J.W., Burch, R.J., and Vinson, D.C., The information needs of family physicians: casespecific clinical questions, J. Family Pract., 1992, vol. 35, pp. 265–269.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Osheroff, J.A., Forsythe, D.E., Buchanan, B.G., et al., Physicians’ information needs: analysis of questions posed during clinical teaching, Ann. Int. Med., 1991, vol. 114, pp. 576–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Covell, D.G., Uman, G.C., and Manning, P.R., Information needs in office practice: are they being met? Ann. Int. Med., 1985, vol. 103, pp. 596–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, R., What clinical information do doctors need? Brit. Med. J., 1996, vol. 313, pp. 1062–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ely, J.W., Osheroff, J.A., Chambliss, M.L., et al., Answering physicians’ clinical questions: obstacles and potential solutions, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 2005, vol. 12, pp. 217–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hersh, W.R., Crabtree, M.K., Hickam, D.H., et al., Factors associated with success in searching medline and applying evidence to answer clinical questions, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 2002, vol. 9, pp. 283–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ely, J.W., Osheroff, J.A., Ebell, M.H., et al., Evans ER: analysis of questions asked by family doctors regarding patient care, Brit. Med. J., 1999, vol. 319, pp. 358–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cullen, R.J., In search of evidence: family practitioners’ use of the internet for clinical information, J. Med. Lib. Assoc., 2002, vol. 90, pp. 370–379.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stephens, M.B. and von Thun, A.M., Military medical informatics: accessing information in the deployed environment, Military Med., 2009, vol. 174, pp. 259–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kitchin, D.R. and Applegate, K.E., Learning radiology a survey investigating radiology resident use of textbooks, journals, and the internet, Acad. Radiol., 2007, vol. 14, pp. 1113–1120.

    Google Scholar 

  13. O’Keeffe, J., Willinsky, J., and Maggio, L., Public access and use of health research: an exploratory study of the national institutes of health (NIH) public access policy using interviews and surveys of health personnel, J. Med. Internet. Res., 2011, vol. 13, no. 4, e97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Thiele, R.H., Poiro, N.C., Scalzo, D.C., and Nemergut, E.C., Speed, accuracy, and confidence in google, ovid, pubmed, and uptodate: results of a randomised trial, Postgrad. Med. J., 2010, vol. 86, pp. 459–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Purcell, G.P., Wilson, P., and Delamothe, T., The quality of health information on the internet, Brit. Med. J., 2002, vol. 324, pp. 557–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Silberg, W.M., Lundberg, G.D., and Musacchio, R.A., Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the internet: Caveant lector et vieworlet the reader and viewer beware, J. Am. Med. Ass., 1997, vol. 277, pp. 1244–1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Childs, S., Judging the quality of internet-based health information, Perform. Meas. Metrics, 2005, vol. 6, pp. 80–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Griffiths, K.M., Tang, T.T., Hawking, D., and Christensen, H., Automated assessment of the quality of depression websites, J. Med. Int. Res., 2005, vol. 7, e59.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Griffiths, K.M. and Christensen, H., Quality of web based information on treatment of depression: cross sectional survey, Brit. Med. J., 2000, vol. 321, pp. 1511–1515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Benigeri, M. and Pluye, P., Shortcomings of health information on the internet, Health. Promot. Int., 2003, vol. 18, pp. 381–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cline, R.J. and Haynes, K.M., Consumer health information seeking on the internet: the state of the art, Health. Educ. Res., 2001, vol. 16, pp. 671–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Freeman, M.K., Lauderdale, S.A., Kendrach, M.G., and Woolley, T.W., Google scholar versus pubmed in locating primary literature to answer drug-related questions, Ann. Pharmacotherapy, 2009, vol. 43, pp. 478–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Users’ guide to the medical literature. A manual for evidence-based clinical practice Guyatt, G., Rennie, D., Meade, M.O., and Cook, D.J., Eds., 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, 2008`.

  24. Haynes, R.B., Of studies, summaries, synopses, and systems: the “4S” evolution of services for finding best current evidence, Evid. Based Ment. Health, 2001, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 37–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dans, A.L., Dans, L.F., and Silvestre, M.A., Painless Evidence-Based Medicine, Chichester: Wiley, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sackett, D.L., Straus, S.E., Richardson, W.S., et al., Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach Evidence-Based Medicine Edinburgh: Churchill Livingston, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hersh, W.R. and Hickam, D.H., How well do physicians use electronic information retrieval systems? A framework for investigation and systematic review, J. Am. Med. Ass., 1998, vol. 280, pp. 1347–1352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © G.I. Nazarenko, G.S. Osipov, E.B. Kleimenova, I.V. Smirnov, L.P. Yashina, A.I. Molodchenkov, A.G. Nazarenko, 2012, published in Iskusstvennyi Intellekt i Prinyatie Reshenii, 2012, No. 4, pp. 51–60.

About this article

Cite this article

Nazarenko, G.I., Osipov, G.S., Kleimenova, E.B. et al. A Guide to the medical literature. Methods and support software for evidence-based medical technology. Sci. Tech.Inf. Proc. 40, 302–310 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688213050079

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688213050079

Keywords

Navigation