Abstract
Amman-Zerqa Basin (AZB) is the second largest groundwater basin in Jordan with the highest abstraction rate, where more than 28% of total abstractions in Jordan come from this basin. In view of the extensive reliance on this basin, contamination of AZB groundwater became an alarming issue. This paper develops a Modified DRASTIC model by combining the generic DRASTIC model with land use activities and lineament density for the study area with a new model map that evaluates pollution potential of groundwater resources in AZB to various types of pollution. It involves the comparison of modified DRASTIC model that integrates nitrate loading along with other DRASTIC parameters. In addition, parameters to account for differences in land use and lineaments density were added to the DRASTIC model to reflect their influences on groundwater pollution potential. The DRASTIC model showed only 0.08% (3 km2) of the AZB is situated in the high vulnerability area and about 30% of the basin is located in the moderately vulnerable zone (mainly in central basin). After modifying the DRASTIC to account for lineament density, about 87% of the area was classified as having low pollution potential and no vulnerability class accounts for about 5.01% of the AZB area. The moderately susceptible zone covers 7.83% of the basin’s total area and the high vulnerability area constitutes 0.13%. The vulnerability map based on land use revealed that about 71% of the study area has low pollution potential and no vulnerability area accounts for about 0.55%, whereas moderate pollution potential zone covers an area of 28.35% and the high vulnerability class constitutes 0.11% of AZB. The final DRASTIC model which combined all DRASTIC models shows that slightly more than 89% of the study area falls under low pollution risk and about 6% is considered areas with no vulnerability. The moderate pollution risk potential covers an area of about 4% of AZB and the high vulnerability class constitutes 0.21% of the basin. The results also showed that an area of about 1761 km2 of bare soils is of low vulnerability, whereas about 28 km2 is moderately vulnerable. For agriculture and the urban sector, approximately 1472 km2 are located within the low vulnerability zone and about 144 km2 are moderately vulnerable, which together account for about 8% of the total agriculture and urban area. These areas are contaminated with human activities, particularly from the agriculture. Management of land use must be considered when changing human or agricultural activity patterns in the study area, to reduce groundwater vulnerability in the basin. The results also showed that the wells with the highest nitrate levels (81–107 mg/l) were located in high vulnerable areas and are attributed to leakage from old sewage water.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Villeneuve J., Banton O. and Lafrance P., A problematic approach for the groundwater vulnerability to contamination by pesticides: the VULPEST model. Ecological Modeling 51, 1990, 47–58
Al-Adamant R., Foster I., and Baban S., Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping for the Basaltic aquifer of the Azraq basin of Jordan using GIS, Remote sensing and DRASTIC, Applied Geography 23(4), 2003, 303–324
El-Naqa A., Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment Using the DRASTIC Model at Russeifa Landfill, Northeast Jordan, Environmental Geology 47(1), 2004, 51–62
Al Kuisi M., El-Naqa A. and Hammouri N., Vulnerability mapping of shallow groundwater aquifer using SINTACS model in the Jordan Valley area, Jordan, Environmental Geology 50, 2006, 645–650
Werz H. and Hötz H., Groundwater Risk Intensity Mapping in Semi-Arid Regions Using Optical Remote Sensing Data as an Additional Tool, Hydrogeology Journal 15(6), 2007, 1031–1049
Hammouri N. and El-Naqa A., GIS based Hydrogeological Vulnerability Mapping of Groundwater Resources in Jerash Area-Jordan, Geofísica Internacional 47(2), 2008, 85–97
Awawdeh M. and Jaradat R., Evaluation of Aquifers Vulnerability to Contamination in the Yarmouk Basin, Jordan, Based on DRASTIC Method, Jaradat Arabian Journal of Geosciences 3(3), 2010, 273–282
Al-Rawabdeh A., Al-Ansari N. Al-Taani A., and Knutsson S., A GIS-Based Drastic Model for Assessing Aquifer Vulnerability in Amman-Zerqa Groundwater Basin, Jordan, J. Engineering 5(12), 2013, 490–504
Shirazi S., Imran H., and Akib S., GIS-based DRASTIC method for groundwater vulnerability assessment: A review. Journal of Risk Research 15(8), 2012, 991–1011
Al Hallaq A. and Elaish A., Assessment of aquifer vulnerability to contamination in Khan younis Governorate, Gaza Strip, Palestine, using the DRASTIC model within GIS environment. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 1, 2011, 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s12517-011-0284-9
Shamrukh M., Corapcioglu M., Hassona, A. and Fayek A., Modeling the Effect of Chemical Fertilizers on Ground Water Quality in the Nile Valley Aquifer, Egypt. Ground Water 39 2001, 59–67
Al-Hanbali A., and Kondoh A., Groundwater vulnerability assessment and evaluation of human activity impact (HAI) within the Dead Sea groundwater basin, Jordan. Hydrogeology Journal 16(3), 2008, 499–510
Jasem H., Alraggad M., Assessing Groundwater Vulnerability in Azraq Basin Area by a Modified DRASTIC Index. Water Resource and Protection 2, 2010, 944–951
DOS-Department of Statistics, Estimation of population by Governorate, Department of Statistics, Amman, 2004, www.dos.gov.jo/sdb_pop_e/ehsaat/alsokan/1_2004.htm
Awawdeh M. and Nawafleh A., A GIS-based EPIK model for assessing aquifer vulnerability in Irbid Governorate, North Jordan, Jordan Journal of civil Engineering 2(3), 2008
Obeidat M., Ahmad F., Hammouri N., Massadeh F. and Athamneh F., Assessment of nitrate contamination of karst spring, Bani Kanana, northern Jordan. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geologicas 25, 2008, 426–437
Lee SR., Lee D. H., Choi S. H., Kim W. Y., Lee S. G., Regional groundwater pollution susceptibility analysis using DRASTICsystem and lineament density. The Eighteen International ESRI User Conference, 1998
Ferreira J. and Oliveira J., DRASTIC groundwater vulnerability mapping of Portugal. In Groundwater: an endangered resource Proceedings of theme C of the 27th Congress of the International Association for Hydraulic Research, San Francisco, USA, 1997, 6
American Public Health Association (APHA), Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th edition. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 1998
WAJ — Water Authority of Jordan, WAJ Internal Files for Groundwater Basins in Jordan, 2006, http://www.mwi.gov.jo/sites/en-us
MOA — Ministry of Agricultural, The soils of Jordan. National soil map and land use project. Hunting Technical Services Ltd. in association with Soil Survey and Land Research Centre. Vol. 2-level 2, main report. Ministry of Agricultural, Amman, Jordan. 1994
Salameh L., Assessment of land use /cover changes in the Zerqa basin using remote sensing and Markove model, Faculty of graduate studies, University of Jordan, Amman.(unpublished M.Sc. thesis, 2006
MacDonald M. and Partners in Cooperation with Hunting Geological Surveys Limited: East Bank Water Resources, East Bank Water Resources, Vol. 5, Ministry of Water and Irrigation, Amman, 1965, 512
Salameh E. and Udluft P., The Hydrodynamic Pattern of the Central Part of Jordan, Geologisches Jahrbuch Reihe C 38, 1985, 39–55
Bender F., Geology of Jordan, Contributions to the Regional Geology of the Earth, Supplementary Edition of Vol. 7, 196, Berline-Stuttgart (Gebruder Borntraeger), 1974
Al Mahamid J., Integration of Water Resources of the Upper Aquifer in Amman-Zerqa Basin Based on Mathematical Modeling and GIS, Jordan, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Jordan, Amman, 2005
Napolitano P. and Fabbri A., Single-Parameter Sensitivity Analysis for Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment Using DRASTIC and SINTACS, Proceedings of the Vienna conference on Hydro GIS 96: Application of geographic information systems in hydrology and water resources management, IAHS 235, 1996, 559–566.
Aller L., Bennett T., Lehr J. H., Petty R. J. and Hackett G., DRASTIC: A Standardized System for Evaluating Groundwater Pollution Potential Using Hydrogeologic Settings, US Environmental Protection Agency Report 600/2-87/035, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, 1987
Vrba J. and Zoporozec A., Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. IAH International Contribution for Hydrogeology 16, 1994, Hannover7, Heise, 131
US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), (Handbook: Groundwater and Wellhead Protection). US EPA Report No. EPA/625/R-94/001, Washington, DC, 1994, 239
Rosen. L., A study of the DRASTIC methodology with emphasis on Swedish conditions, Ground Water 32(2), 1994, 278–285
Babiker M. Mohammed T. Hiyama and Kato K., A GIS-Based DRASTIC Model for Assessing Aquifer Vulnerability in Kakmigahara Heights, Gifu Prefecture, Central Japan, Science of the Total Environmental 3 45(1–3), 2005, 127–140
Anwar M., Prem C. and Rao V. B., Evaluation of Groundwater Potential of Musi River Catchment Using DRASTIC Index Model, In: Venkateshwar, B. R. Ram, M. K. Sarala C. S. and Raju, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Hydrology and Watershed Management, B. S. Publishers, Hyderabad, 2003, 399–409
Chandrashekhar H., Adiga S., Lakshminarayana V., Jagdeesha C. J. and Nataraj, C., A Case Study Using the Model ‘DRASTIC’ for Assessment of Groundwater Pollution Potential, Proceedings of the ISRS National Symposium on Remote Sensing Applications for Natural Resources, Indian Society of Remote Sensing, Bagalore, 19–21 June 1999, 414–417
Dixon B., Groundwater Vulnerability Mapping: A GIS and Fuzzy Rule Based Integrated Tool, Applied Geography, 2005, 25(4), 327–347.
Margane M., Management and Protection and Sustainable Use of Groundwater and Soil Resources in the Arab Region, Volume 4: Guideline for Groundwater Vulnerability Mapping and Risk Assessment for Susceptibility of Groundwater Resources to Contamination, Project No. 1996.2189.7, Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, Bonn, 2003.
Shahid S., A Study of Groundwater Pollution Vulnerability Using DRASTIC/GIS, west Bengal, India, Journal of Environmental Hydrology 8(11–12), 2000, 124
Rundquist A., Peters D. Liping Rodekohr D., Ehrman R. and Murray G., State-Wide Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment in Nebraska Using the DRASTIC/GIS Model, Geo-Cartography International 6(2), 1991, 51–58
O’Leary D., Freidman J., and Pohn H., Lineaments, linear, lineation-some proposed new standards for old terms. Geological Society of America Bulletin 87, 1976, 1463–1469
Lattman H. and Parizek R. Relationship between fracture traces and the occurrence of ground water in carbonate rocks. Journal of Hydrology 2, 1964, 73–91
Mabee S. Hardcastle K. and Wise D., A method of collecting and analyzing lineaments for regionalscale fractured-bedrock aquifer studies, Groundwater 32(6), 1994, 884–894
Hardcastle K., Photolineament factor: a new computer-aided method for remotely sensing the degree to which bedrock is fractured, Photogramm, Eng Remote Sensing 61(6), 1995, 739–747
Magowe M. and Carr R., Relationship between lineaments and ground water occurrence in western Botswana, Ground Water 37(2), 1999, 282–286
Fernandes D. and Rudolph A., The influence of Cenozoic tectonics on the groundwater production capacity of fractured zones: A case study in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Hydrogeology Journal 9, 2001, 151–167
MOCT (Ministry of Construction and Transportation) and KOWACO (Korea Water Resources Corporation), The handbook of drawing and management of hydrogeological map, MOCT, Korea, 1998, 456
Merchant G., GIS-based groundwater pollution hazard assessment: a critical review of the DRASTC model, Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 60, 1994, 1117–1127
Secunda S., Collin M. and Melloul A. J., Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Using a Composite Model Combining DRASTIC with Extensive Land Use in Israel’s Sharon Region, Journal of Environmental Management 54(1), 1998, 39–57
Chowdany V., Rao N. and Samara P., Decision support framework for assessment of non-point source pollution of groundwater in large irrigation projects, Agric Water Manag 75, 2005, 194–225
Mac Quarrie K., Sudicky E., and Roberston W., Numerical simulation of a fine-grained denitrification layer for removing septic system nitrate from shallow groundwater, J Hydrol 52, 2001, 29–55
Postma D., Boesen C., Kristiansen H. and Larsen F., Nitrate reduction in an unconfined sandy aquifer: water chemistry, reduction processes and geochemical modeling. Water Resource Res 527, 1991, 45–202
Baker L., Introduction to non-point source pollution in the United States and prospects for wetland use, Ecol Eng 1, 1992, 1–26
Hubbard R. and Sheridan J., Nitrates in groundwater in the southeastern USA. In; Adriano, D., Iskadar A., Murarka I. editors. Contamination of groundwaters. Northwood, United Kingdom, Science Reviews, 1994, 45–303
Ford M. and Tellam J., Source, type and extent of inorganic contamination within the Birmingham urban aquifer system, UK, J. Hydrol. 156, 1994, 101–135
Lerner D., Yang Y., Barrett M. and Tellam J., Loading of non-agricultural nitrogen in urban groundwater. In: Ellis, J.B. (Ed.), Impacts of urban growth on surface and groundwater quality, IAHS publ. No. 259. IAHS Press, 1999, 117–123
Seiler R., Combined use of 15N and 18O of nitrate and 11B to evaluate nitrate contamination in groundwater, Applied Geochemistry 20, 2005, 1626–1636
Navarro M. Carbonell, Evaluation of groundwater contamination beneath an urban environment: The Besòs river basin (Barcelona, Spain). Journal of Environmental Management 85, 2007, 259–269
World Health Organization (WHO), Drinking water quality-water, Background document for preparation of WHO Guidelines for drinking-water quality, Geneva, 4th ed., 2011
Jordanian Drinking Water Standards JS286/1997, http://ocid.nacse.org/rewab/docs/JS286_Drinking_Water_Standards_1997_en.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Al-Rawabdeh, A.M., Al-Ansari, N.A., Al-Taani, A.A. et al. Modeling the risk of groundwater contamination using modified DRASTIC and GIS in Amman-Zerqa Basin, Jordan. cent.eur.j.eng 4, 264–280 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2478/s13531-013-0163-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13531-013-0163-0