Skip to main content
Log in

To trust or not to trust? Interpretations in qualitative research

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Human Affairs

Abstract

Interpretations of data in qualitative research may be biased for many reasons. This paper explores three commonly overlooked problems from a rather positivist point of view and deals with them mainly through the lens of cognitive psychology and survey methodology. The first problem is that researchers and readers of the research tend to trust retrospective data too much even though it is known that our memory is highly reconstructive. The second problem is that we often create interpretations too quickly and do not ground them in data well. The third problem is inappropriately generalising our findings because we underrate the variability of the phenomena studied. The aim is not to employ quantitative criteria in qualitative research but to show that especially in cases where we seek more objectivity (e.g., factual information about events) and less about the subjective phenomenal world (e.g., how people perceive these events from today’s perspective), cognitive psychology or survey methodology can offer valuable insights. Recommendations about what researchers should be careful of and how to increase the objectivity of the interpretations are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anginer, D., Fisher, K. L., Statman, M. (2007). Stocks of admired companies and despised ones. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=962168 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.962168 (February).

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahrick, H. P. (1983). The cognitive map of a city: Fifty years of learning and memory. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 125–163). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, P. O., & Wittlinger, R. P. (1975). Fifty years of memory for names and faces: A cross-sectional approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(1), 54–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. (2008). Thinking and deciding (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, N., Sudman, S., & Wansink, B. (2004). Asking questions. Rev. ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, L. A., Koehler, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1996). On the evaluation of one-sided evidence. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 9(1), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassel, E., Bernstein, D. A. (2007). Criminal behavior (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, B. (2011, November 3). Fraud case seen as a red flag for psychology research. New York Times, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdiny, R. B. (2009). Influence: science and practice (5th ed.) Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M. A., Meares, K., & Standart, S. (2004). Images and goals. Memory, 12(4), 525–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and metaanalysis. Hove: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M. F. (2003). Confirmatory bias in the evaluation of personality descriptions: Positive test strategies and output interference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 736–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.). (2009). Development of professional expertise: Toward measurement of expert performance and design of optimal learning environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey research methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friese, S. (2014). Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillebeau, C. (2012). The $100 startup: Reinvent the way you make a living, do what you love, and create a new future. New York: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, C. & Heath, D. (2007). Made to stick. Why some ideas survive and others die. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2013). Beyond significance testing: Statistics reform in the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). Washington, DC: APA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of auto-mobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 13, 585–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E. F. (1996). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M. (2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3). Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1428

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A.M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morewedge, C. K., & Kahneman, D. (2010). Associative processes in intuitive judgment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(10), 435–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neusar, A. (2009). Jaké zdroje informací používáme při usuzování o příčinách vlastního chování [Sources of information we use when reasoning about the causes of our behaviour]. E-psychologie, 3(2). Available at: http://e-psycholog.eu/pdf/neusar.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Neusar, A. (2011). Kdy se to jenom stalo? (Ne)dokonalost paměti na osobní a veřejné události [When did it happen? (Im)perfection of memory for personal and public events]. Brno: MSD. Or dissertation in English available at: http://is.muni.cz/th/195480/fss_d

    Google Scholar 

  • Neusar, A., Hoferková, J., & Ježek, S. (2011). Přesnost datace mediálně známých veřejných událostí [Dating accuracy of well-known public events]. Mediální studia, 02, 120–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peräkyl, A. (2004). Reliability and validity in research based upon transcripts. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (2nd ed., pp. 282–303).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ptčáková, K. (2012) Professional curiosity engaged in policy sociology. Human Affairs, 22(4), 475–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L. (1999). The seven sins of memory: Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience. American Psychologist, 54(3), 182–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N. (2007). Retrospective and concurrent self-reports: The rationale for real-time data capture. In A. A. Stone, S. S. Shiffman, A. Atienza, & L. Nebeling (Eds.), The science of real-time data capture: Self-reports in health research (pp. 11–26). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, N., Strack, F., & Mai, H. (1991). Assimilation and contrast effects in part-whole question sequences: A conversational logic analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55(1), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlmeier, P., & Betsch, T. (2002) (Eds.). Etc. Frequency processing and cognition. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skowronski, J. J., Betz, A. L., Thompson, C. P., Walker, R. W., & Shannon, L. (1994). The impact of differing memory domains on event-dating processes in self and proxy reports. In N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (Eds.), Autobiographical memory and the validity of retrospective reports (pp. 217–231). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spry, Y. (2011). Performative autoethnography: critical embodiments and possibilities. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 497–512). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2002). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 421–440). New York, NY US: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Sternberg, K. (2010). The psychologist’s companion: A guide to writing scientific papers for students and researchers (5th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stoklasa, J., Talášek, T., & Musilová, J. (2014). Fuzzy approach — a new chapter in the methodology of psychology? Human affairs, 24(2), 189–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, P. (2007). The halo effect: … and the eight other business delusions that deceive managers. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, N. N. (2010). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable (2nd ed). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., Rips, L. J., & Rasinski, K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Oxford: OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vranka, M. (2013). Bariéry kritického myšlení v psychotherapy. In A. Neusar, M. Charvát, M. Dolejš, D. Janečková, R. Procházka (Eds.), PhD Existence III. Olomouc: Palacký University. Available at: http://www.ff.upol.cz/fileadmin/user_upload/FFkatedry/psychologie/Konference/PhD_existence_III/sbornik_odbornych_prispevku_tisk.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, W. B., & Leonard, J. M. (1981). Directed search through autobiographical memory. Memory & Cognition, 9(6), 566–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleš Neusar.

Additional information

Supported by grant CZ.1.07/2.200/28.0138 (Education modularization in management and psychology at Palacky University in Olomouc through innovation and linking between Economic and Psychology study programs)

About this article

Cite this article

Neusar, A. To trust or not to trust? Interpretations in qualitative research. Humaff 24, 178–188 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0218-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0218-9

Keywords

Navigation