Skip to main content
Log in

Readiness for change and job satisfaction in a case of lean management application — A comparative study

  • Original papers
  • Published:
International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health

Abstract

Objectives

This current study investigates the effect of lean management system on work attitudes of workers of two manufacturing companies. “Lean management” is a concept of work processes and human relations that determines company’s productivity and profitability. Workers of two enterprises, the first one with lean production and the second one with old mass production, were compared for their readiness for change and job satisfaction (both emotional and cognitive aspect).

Materials and Methods

The sample of 102 employees completed a battery of instruments such as: the Job Description Inventory by Neuberger and Allerbeck, the Job Affect Scale by Burke et al. and the Change-Readiness Scale by Kriegel and Brandt. Results: Individuals from the lean manufacturing company were characterized by higher level of readiness for change, positive affect at work, and cognitive job satisfaction.

Conclusions

In this approach the introduction of lean production positively affected company’s human resource attitudes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sun S. The strategic role of lean production in SOE’s Development. Int J Business Manag 2011;6:160–168.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Applebaum E, Batt R. The new American workplace: Transforming work systems in the United States. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D. The machine that changed the world. New York: Macmillan; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Taira K. Compatibility of human resource management, industrial relations, and engineering under mass production and lean production: an exploration. Appl Psychol 1996;45:97–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fucini J, Fucini S. Working for the Japanese: Inside Mazda’s American auto plant. New York: Free Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Parker M, Slaughter J. Choosing sides: Unions and team concept. Boston: South End Press; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Landsbergis PA, Cahill J, Schnall P. The impact of lean production and related new systems of work organization on worker health. J Occup Health Psychol 1999;4:108–130.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Adler PS, Cole RE. Designed for learning: A tale of two auto plants. Sloan Manag Rev 1993;34:85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mullarkey S, Jackson PR, Parker SK. Introducing JIT within product-based work-teams. Int J Operat Product Manag 1995;15:62–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jackson PR, Mullarkey S. Lean production teams and health in garment manufacture. J Occup Health Psychol 2000;5:231–245.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Parker SK. Longitudinal effects of lean production on employees outcomes and mediating role of work characteristics. J Appl Psychol 2003;4:620–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brief AP. Attitudes in and around organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Neuberger O, Allerbeck M. Measurement and Analysis of Satisfaction with Work. Bern, Stuttgart, Wien: Rubber; 1978 [in German].

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kriegel R, Brandt D. Sacred cows make the best burgers. Developing change-ready people and organizations. New York: Warner Books; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Change management: the HR strategic imperative as a business partner. HR Magazine 2007;01 December [cited 2012 January 4]. Available from URL: http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-7310774/Change-management-theHR-strategic.html.

  16. Chatman JA, Jehn KA. Organizational culture in the service sector: A between-industry comparison. Evanston: Northwestern University; 2001.

  17. Chapman ML, Elhance AP, Wenum JD. Mitsubishi Motors in Illinois: Global strategies, local impacts. Westport, CT: Quorum Books; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Unchanged job satisfaction with “Lean”. NordKraft 2010;24 January [cited 2012 January 6]. Available from URL: http://nordkraft.biz/unchanged-job-satisfaction-with-lean.

  19. Nordin N, Deros BM, Wahab DA. Relationship between organizational change and lean manufacturing implementation in Malaysian automotive industry. The 14th Asia Pacific Regional Meeting of International Foundation for Production Research; 2010 Dec 7–10, Melaka, Malaysia [cited 2012 January 5]. Available from URL: http://apiems.net/archive/apiems2010/pdf/LM/19.pdf.

  20. Papadopoulou TC, Ozbayrak M. Leanness: experience from the journey to date. J Manufact Technol Manag 2005;16:784–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hardin E. Job satisfaction and the desire for change. J Appl Psychol 1967;16:20–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Brief AP, Burke MJ, George JM, Robinson B, Webster J. Should negative affectivity remain an unmeasured variable in the study of job stress? Journal of Applied Psychology 1988;73:193–198.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Adler PS. The “learning bureaucracy”: New United Motor Manufacturing. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL, editors. Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1993. p. 111–194.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Beckhard R, Harris R. Organizational Transitions: Managing Complex Change. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Brofenbrenner M. An essay on negative screening. In: Shishido T, Sato I, Okita S, editors. Economic policy and development: new perspectives. London: Croom Helm; 1985. p. 188–198.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agnieszka Lipińska-Grobelny.

About this article

Cite this article

Lipińska-Grobelny, A., Papieska, E. Readiness for change and job satisfaction in a case of lean management application — A comparative study. IJOMEH 25, 418–425 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2478/S13382-012-0044-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/S13382-012-0044-4

Key words

Navigation