Skip to main content
Log in

A reconsideration of Encyclia (orchidaceae)

  • Published:
Brittonia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The status of the genusEncyclia is reviewed, and this genus is compared withEpidendrum. As currently used,Epidendrum is a very heterogeneous assortment of species, resulting largely from the over-emphasis on certain “key characters.” If a greater emphasis is given to the internal coherence of the species groups within theEpidendrum alliance, about thirty genera can be recognized, with Envyclia and Epide~drum in different sectors of the alliance. The limited data on inter-speelfic crossability suggests that the entire alliance is a comparinm in genecologica] terms. The only alternative to the recognition ofEpidendrum andEncyclia as distinct genera is the union of all thirty genera into one, which is considered to be impractical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Allen, P. H. 1958. A natural hybrid from Honduras. Am. Orchid Soc. Bull.27: 310–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1959. Notes on Epidendrum stamfordianum. Am. Orchid Soc. Bull.28: 174–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, O., Hubbard, F. T., & Schweinfurth, C. 1936. The genus Epidendrum in the United States and Middle America. 233 pp., Cambridge, Mass.

  • Clausen, J. 1951. Stages in the evolution of plant species. 206 pp., Ithaca.

  • Darwin, C. 1862. On the various contrivances by which British and foreign orchids are fertilised by insects. 365 pp., London.

  • Dressier, R. L., &Dodson, C. H. 1960. Classification and phylogeny in the Orchidaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.47: 25–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoehne, F. C. 1947. Presente estado da subsecÇÃoHolochila de SecÇÃoAulizeum do gÊnerEpidendrum, no Brasil. Arq. Bot. SÃo Paulo II.2: 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1952. Lista preliminar das espécies do gÊneroEncyclia Hooker para contrÔle. Arq. Bot. SÃo Paulo II.2: 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenz, L. W., & Wimber, D. E. 1959. Hybridization and inheritance in Orchids.In C. L. Withner, The orchids, a scientific survey, pp.261–314. New York.

  • Mason, H. L. 1945. The genusEriastrum and the influence of Bentham and Gray upon the problem of generic confusion in Polemoniaceae. Madroño8: 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweinfurth, C. 1952. Orehidaceae peruvianae IX. Bot. Mus. Leafl.15: 139–170 & 16 pl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. O. 1952.Encyclia, a segregate fromEpidendrum? Ceiba3: 154–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, T. 1866. BeitrÄg zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Orchideen-Blüthe. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.4: 261–304, illus.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I wish here to express my gratitude to Mrs. S. F. Velick, whose skill and patience produced Figures 2 and 3, and especially to Mrs. James Klotz and Mr. Armyn Spiess, who kindly lent living material for use in their preparation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dressler, R.L. A reconsideration of Encyclia (orchidaceae). Brittonia 13, 253–266 (1961). https://doi.org/10.2307/2805341

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2805341

Keywords

Navigation