Skip to main content
Log in

The relationship between cohabitation and divorce: Selectivity or causal influence?

  • Household organization
  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

Recent evidence linking premarital cohabitation to high rates of divorce poses a complex theoretical and empirical puzzle. We develop hypotheses predicting that premarital cohabitation is selective of those who are prone to divorce as well as hypotheses predicting that the experience of premarital cohabitation produces attitudes and values which increase the probability of divorce. Using multiwave panel data from a recent cohort of young men and women in the United States, we specify and test models of these predictions. The results are consistent with hypotheses suggesting that cohabitation is selective of men and women who are less committed to marriage and more approving of divorce. The results also are consistent with the conclusion that cohabiting experiences significantly increase young people’s acceptance of divorce.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axinn, W. G. and A. Thornton. 1991. “The Intergenerational Reciprocal Relationships between Cohabitation Attitudes and Cohabitation and Marriage Behavior.” Unpublished marmscript, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

  • Axinn, W. G. and A. Thornton. 1992. “The Influence of Parental Resources on the Timing of the Transition to Marriage.” Social Science Research, forthcoming.

  • Balakrishnan, T. R., K. V. Rao, E. Lapierre-Adamcyk, and K. J. Krotki. 1987. “A Hazard Model Analysis of the Covariates of Marriage Dissolution in Canada.” Demography 24:395–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva, M. and S. R. Lerman. 1987. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N. G., A. K. Blanc, and D. E. Bloom. 1988. “Commitment and the Modern Union: Assessing the Link between Premarital Cohabitation and Subsequent Marital Stability.” American Sociological Review 53:127–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. and D. Johnson. 1988. “Premarital Cohabitation and Marital Success.” Journal of Family Issues 9:255–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bumpass, L. L. and J. A. Sweet. 1989. “National Estimates of Cohabitation.” Demography 26:615–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch, T. K. and A. K. Madan. 1986. Union Formation and Dissolution: Results from the 1984 Family History Survey. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, No. 99–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. 1981. Marriage. Divorce. Remarriage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R. 1972. “Regression Models and Life Tables.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B34:187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson, D. M., L. J. Horwood, and F. T. Shannon. 1984. “A Proportional Hazards Model of Family Breakdown.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 46:539–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D., A. Thornton, and D. Camburn. 1980. “Maintaining Response Rates in Longitudinal Studies.” Sociological Methods and Research 9:87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, D., A. Thornton, D. Camburn, D. Alwin, and L. Young-DeMarco. 1988. “The Life History Calendar: A Technique for Collecting Retrospective Data.” pp. 37–68 in Sociological Methodology 18, edited by C. C. Clogg. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, D. P. 1978. “The Effects of Demographic Factors, Family Background, and Early Job Achievement on Age at Marriage.” Demography 15:161–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, D. P. and E. M. Kitagawa. 1985. “The Impact of Social Status, Family Structure, and Neighborhoodon the Fertility of Black Adolescents.” American Journal of Sociology 90:825–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobrin, F. and L. J. Waite. 1984. “Effects of Childhood Family Structure on the Transition to Marriage.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 46:807–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. 1959. Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marini, M. M. 1978. “The Transition to Adulthood: Sex Differences in Educational Attainment and Age at Marriage.” American Sociological Review 43:483–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, T. C. and L. L. Bumpass. 1989. “Recent Trends in Marital Disruption.” Demography 26:37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. 1975. “On Independence, Structure and Simultaneity in Transportation Demand Analysis.” Working Paper 7511, Urban Travel Demand Forecasting Project, Institute for Transportation and Traffic Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLanahan, S. and L. L. Bumpass. 1988. “Intergenerational Consequences of Family Disruption.” American Journal of Sociology 94:130–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, K. A., J. L. Peterson, and F. F. Furstenberg. 1986. “Parental Attitudes and the Occurrence of Early Sexual Activity.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 48:777–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namboodiri, K. and C. M. Suchindran. 1987. Life Table Techniques and Their Applications. Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, W. 1965. “A Study of Marriage Involving Premarital Pregnancies.” Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Department of Sociology.

  • Rodgers, W. L. and A. Thornton. 1985. “Changing Patterns of First Marriage in the United States.” Demography 22:265–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweet, J. A. and L. L. Bumpass. 1987. American Families and Households. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teachman, J. D. 1983. “Analyzing Social Processes: Life Tables and Proportional Hazards Models.” Social Science Research 12:263–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, E. and U. Colella. 1991. “Cohabitation and Marital Stability: Quality or Commitment?” NSFH Working Paper 23, Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin.

  • Thornton, A. 1985a. “Changing Attitudes toward Separation and Divorce: Causes and Consequences.” American Journal of Sociology 90:856–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1985b. “Reciprocal Influences of Family and Religion in a Changing World.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 47:381–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988. “Cohabitation and Marriage in the 1980s.” Demography 26:497–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1989. “Changing Attitudes toward Family Issues in the United States.” Journal ofMarriage and the Family 51:873–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991. “Influence of the Marital History of Parents on the Marital and Cohabitational Experience of Children.” American Journal of Sociology 96:868–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A., W. G. Axinn, and D. H. Hill. 1992. “Reciprocal Effects of Religiosity, Cohabitation, and Marriage.” American Journal of Sociology, forthcoming.

  • Thornton, A., D. Freedman, and D. Camburn. 1982. “Obtaining Respondent Cooperation in Family Panel Studies.” Sociological Methods and Research 11:33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, A. and W. L. Rodgers. 1987. “The Influence of Individual and Historical Time on Marital Dissolution.” Demography 24:1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waite, L. J. and G. D. Spitze. 1981. “Young Women’s Transition to Marriage.” Demography 18:681–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (Grant #R01-HD19342). The authors wish to thank Dan Hill for statistical assistance; Marin Clarkberg, Steve Plank, and Kashif Sheikh for their assistance with the preparation of the tables contained in this paper; Linda Young-DeMarco for her assistance with the data management for these analyses; and Judy Baughn for her assistance in preparing the manuscript. The authors alone retain responsibility for any errors or omissions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Axinn, W.G., Thornton, A. The relationship between cohabitation and divorce: Selectivity or causal influence?. Demography 29, 357–374 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2307/2061823

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2061823

Keywords

Navigation