Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Biomass and production of benthic microalgal communities in estuarine habitats

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate measures of intertidal benthic microalgal standing stock (biomass) and productivity are needed to quantify their potential contribution to food webs. Oxygen microelectrode techniques, used in this study, provide realistic measures of intertidal benthic microalgal production. By dividing a salt-marsh estuary into habitat types, based on sediment and sunlight characteristics, we have developed a simple way of describing benthic microalgal communities. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare benthic microalgal biomass and production in five different estuarine habitats over an 18-mo period to document the relative contributions of benthic microalgal productivity in the different habitat types. Samples were collected bimonthly from April 1990 to October 1991. Over the 18-mo period, tall Spartina zone habitats had the highest (101.5 mg chlorophyll a (Chl a) m−2±6.9 SE) and shallow subtidal habitats the lowest (60.4±8.9 SE) microalgal biomass. There was a unimodal peak in biomass during the late winter-early spring period. The concentrations of photopigments (Chl a and total pheopigments) in the 0–5 mm of sediments were highly correlated (r2=0.73 and 0.88, respectively) with photopigment concentrations in the 5–10 mm depth interval. Biomass specific production (μmol O2 mg Chl a −1 h−1) was highest in intertidal mudflat habitats (206.3±11.2 SE) and lowest in shallow subtidal habitats (104.3±11.1 SE). Regressions of maximum production (production at saturating irradiances) vs. biomass (Chl a) in the upper 2 mm of sediment by habitat type gave some of the highest correlations ever reported for benthic microalgal communities (r2 values ranged from 0.43 to 0.73). The habitat approach and oxygen microelectrode techniques provide a useful, realistic ranged from 0.43 to 0.73). The habitat approach and oxygen microelectrode techniques provide a useful, realistic method for understanding the biomass and production dynamics of estuarine benthic microalgal communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Admiraal, W. 1984. The ecology of estuarine sediment-inhabiting diatoms. Progress in Phycological Research 3:269–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asmus, R. 1982. Field measurements on seasonal variation of the activity of primary producers on a sandy tidal flat in the northern Wadden Sea. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 16: 389–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bidigare, R., T. Frank, C. Zastrow, and J. Brooks. 1986. The distribution of algal chlorophylls and their degradation products in the Southern Ocean. Deep-Sea Research 33:923–937.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., C. Gibby, and M. Hickman. 1972. Photosynthetic rhythms in epipelic algal populations. British Phycological Journal 7:37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadée, G. and J. Hegeman. 1974. Primary production of the benthic microflora living on tidal flats in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 8:260–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colijn, F. 1982. Light absorption in the waters of the Ems-Dollard estuary and its consequence for the growth of phytoplankton and microphytobenthos. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 15:196–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colijn, F. and V. de Jonge. 1984. Primary production of microphytobenthos in the Ems-Dollard estuary. Marine Ecology Progress Series 14:185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dame, R. and P. Kenny. 1986. Variability of Spartina alterniflora primary production in the euhaline North Inlet estuary. Marine Ecology Progress Series 32:71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dame, R., T. Chrzanowski, K. Bildstein, B. Kjerfve, H. McKellar, D. Nelson, J. Spurrier, S. Stancyk, H. Stevenson, J. Vernberg, and R. Zingmark. 1986. The outwelling hypothesis and North Inlet, South Carolina. Marine Ecology Progress Series 33:217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, W., E. Dunn, K. Holmes, and H. Larew. 1976. A 14C method for measuring epibenthic microalgal productivity in air. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 25: 207–217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, W., C. Montague, F. Plumley, W. Sage, and A. Psalidas. 1981. Factors limiting edaphic algal biomass and productivity in a Georgia salt marsh. Journal of Phycology 17: 122–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. and C. McIntire. 1983. Effects of physical gradients on the production dynamics of sediment-associated algae. Marine Ecology Progress Series 13:103–114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, M., I. Valiela, and J. Teal. 1974. Concentration and distribution of chlorophyll in fertillized plots in a Massachusetts salt marsh. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 14:47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenchel, T. and B. Straarup. 1971. Vertical distribution of photosynthetic pigments and the penetration of light in marine sediments. Oikos 22:172–182.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, S. 1981. Small-scale spatial distribution of meiofauna on a mud and sandflat. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 12: 471–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J. and F. Daiber. 1974. Primary production of edaphic algal communities in a Delaware salt marsh. Limnology and Oceanography 19:390–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gargas, E. 1970. Measurements of primary production, dark fixation and vertical distribution of the microbenthic algae in the Øresund. Ophelia 8:231–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, D. and E. Gallagher. 1990. Field measurement of specific growth rate, biomass, and primary production of benthic diatoms of Savin Hill Cove, Boston. Limnology and Oceanography 35:1757–1770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, J. 1986. Sensitivity of benthic community respiration and primary production to changes in temperature and light. Marine Biology 90:299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, A., R. Zingmark, and J. Dean 1974. Quantitative evidence concerning the stabilization of sediments by marine benthic diatoms. Marine Biology 27:191–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, R. and B. Mahall. 1982. Preliminary observations on the effects of flooding and desiccation upon the net photosynthetic rates of high intertidal estuarine sediments. Limnology and Oceanography 27:954–958.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Höpner, T. and K. Wonneberger. 1985. Examination of the connection between the patchiness of benthic nutrient efflux and epiphytobenthos patchiness on intertidal flats. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 19:277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joint, I. 1978. Microbial production of an estuarine mudflat. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 7:185–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, B. and D. Des Marais. 1986. A simple fiber-optic microprobe for high resolution light measurements: Application in marine sediment. Limnology and Oceanography 31: 1376–1383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneib, R., A. Stiven, and E. Haines. 1980. Stable carbon isotope ratios in Fundulus heteroclitus (L.) muscle tissue and gut contents from a North Carolina Spartina marsh. Journal of Experimental Biology and Ecology 46:89–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen, C. 1967. Determination of chlorophyll and pheopigments: Spectrophotometric equations. Limnology and Oceanography 12:343–346.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montagna, P., B. Coull, T. Herring, and B. Dudley. 1983. The relationship between abundances of meiofauna and their suspected microbial food (diatoms and bacteria). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 17:381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. 1989. Modelling light distribution within the canopy of the marsh grass Spartina alterniflora as a function of canopy biomass and solar angle. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 46: 349–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. and B. Haskin. 1990. A 5-year record of aerial primary production and stand characteristics of Spartina alterniflora. Ecology 71:2209–2217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, B. and R. Howarth. 1987. Sulfur, carbon, and nitrogen isotopes used to trace organic matter flow in the salt-marsh estuaries of Sapelo Island, Georgia. Limnology and Oceanography 32:1195–1213.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pinckney, J. and R. Sandulli. 1990. Spatial autocorrelation analysis of meiofaunal and microalgal populations on an intertidal sandflat: Scale linkage between consumers and resources. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 30:341–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinckney, J. and R. Zingmark. 1991. Effects of tidal stage and sun angles on intertidal benthic microalgal productivity. Marine Ecology Progress Series 76:81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinckney, J. and R. Zingmark. 1993. Modelling intertidal benthic microalgal production in estuarine ecosystems. Journal of Phycology 29:396–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinckney, J. and R. Zingmark. In press. Photophysiological responses of intertidal microalgal communities to in situ light environments: Methodological considerations. Limnology and Oceanography.

  • Pomeroy, L. 1959. Algal productivity in salt marshes of Georgia. Limnology and Oceanography 4:386–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revsbech, N. and B. Jørgensen. 1986. Microelectrodes: Their use in microbial ecology. Advances in Microbial Ecology 9:273–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, W. 1990. Nutrient exchanges between the water column and a subtidal benthic microalgal community. Estuaries 13:219–226.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Round, F. 1971. Benthic marine diatoms. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review 9:83–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellner, K., R. Zingmark, and T. Miller. 1976. Interpretations of the 14C method of measuring the total annual production of phytoplankton in a South Carolina estuary. Botanica Marina 19:119–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuman, F. and C. Lorenzen. 1975. Quantitative degradation of chlorophyll by a marine herbivore. Limnology and Oceanography 20:580–586.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. and F. Daiber. 1975. Light, nitrogen, and phosphorus limitation of edaphic algae in a Delaware salt marsh. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 18:79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. and C. Moncreiff. 1988a. A multivariate analysis of diatom community structure and distribution in a Mississippi salt marsh. Botanica Marina 31:93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. and C. Moncreiff. 1988b. Primary production of edaphic algal communities in a Mississippi salt marsh. Journal of Phycology 24:49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. and C. Moncreiff. 1990. Edaphic algae are an important component of salt marsh food-webs: Evidence from multiple stable isotope analyses. Marine Ecology Progress Series 62:149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raalte, C., I. Valiela, and J. Teal. 1976. Production of epibenthic salt marsh algae: Light and nutrient limitation. Limnology and Oceanography 21:862–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasmund, N. 1986. Ecology and bioproduction in the microphytobenthos of the chain of shallow inlets (boddens) south of the Darss-Zingst Peninsula (southern Baltic Sea). International Revue Gesamten Hydrobiology 71:153–178.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, D. and W. Darley. 1983. Effect of light intensity upon salt marsh benthic microalgal photosynthesis. Marine Biology 75:249–252.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. J. Pinckney

    Present address: Institute of Marine Sciences, 3407 Arendell Street, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, 28557, Morehead City, North Carolina

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences and Belle W. Baruch Institute for Marine Biology and Coastal Research, University of South Carolina, 29208, Columbia, South Carolina

    J. Pinckney & R. G. Zingmark

Authors
  1. J. Pinckney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. G. Zingmark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pinckney, J., Zingmark, R.G. Biomass and production of benthic microalgal communities in estuarine habitats. Estuaries 16, 887–897 (1993). https://doi.org/10.2307/1352447

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1352447

Keywords

Search

Navigation