Skip to main content
Log in

Zooplankton distribution and abundance in the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta in relation to certain environmental factors

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dominant members of the freshwater zooplankton in the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta were those typical of temperate zone rivers—Bosmina andCyclops among the crustaceans andKeratella, Polyarthra, Trichocerca andSynchaeta among the rotifers. The estuarine or brackish component of the plankton was represented by the copepodEurytemora affinis and the rotiferSynchaeta bicornis. Abundace of freshwater zooplankton was highest in the San Joaquin River near Stockton, the region with the highest chlorophylla concentrations and highest temperatures. This was also the region least affected by water project operations, which alter the normal river flow patterns and bring large volumes of zooplankton-deficient Sacramento River water into the San Joaquin River and south delta chanels. Over a seven-year period, abundance of most zooplankton genera was positively correlated with chlorophylla concentrations and temperature but not with net flow velocity. OnlyBosmina had a significant and negative correlation with abundance of a predacious shrimp,Neomysis mercedis. Extreme salinity intrusion in 1977 reduced freshwater zooplankton abundance throughout most of the delta to seven-year lows. All zooplankton groups showed a long-term abundance decline from 1972 to 1978. In the cases of rotifers and copepods, this deciline was significantly correlated with a decline in chlorophylla.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Ambler, J. W., J. E. Cloern, andA. Hutchinson. 1985. Seasonal cycles of zooplankton from San Francisco Bay.Hydrobiologia 129:177–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremer, P., and J. Vijerberg. 1982. Production, population biology and diet ofNeomysis integer (Leach) in a shallow Frisian lake (The Netherlands).In M. D. Morgan (ed.), Ecology of Mysidacea.Hydrobiologia 93(1/2):41–52.

  • Canfield, D. E., Jr., andC. E. Watkins, II. 1984. Relationships between zooplankton abundance and chlorophylla concentrations in Florida lakes.J. Freshw. Ecol. 2:335–344.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chi-Hsiang, L., andK. B. Armitage. 1980. Growth, development and body size of field and laboratory populations ofDaphnia ambiqua.Oikos 35:31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichhorn, R. 1959. Zur populationsynamik der calanoiden. Copepoden in Titisee und Feldsee.Arch. Hydrobiol., Suppl. 24:186–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. J. 1954. Über die populationsdynamik vonEudiaptomus gracilis Sars undHeterocope borealis Fischer in Bodensee-Obersee.Arch. Hydrobiol., Suppl. 20:546–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, F. D., andJ. Orsi. 1984.Oithona davisae, new species, andLimnothona sinensis (Burckhardt, 1912) (Copepoda: Oithonidae) from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary, California.J. Crustacean Biol. 4(1):106–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, A. E. 1964. Plankton of the Sacramento River.Ecology 45:40–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haertel, L., andC. Osterberg. 1967. Ecology of zooplankton, benthos and fishes in the Columbia River estuary.Ecology 48(3):459–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kankaala, P., andF. Wulff. 1981. Experimental studies in temperature dependent embryonic and post-embryonic development rates ofBosmina longispina maritima (Cladocera) in the Baltic.Oikos 36:137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketchum, B. H. 1954. Relation between the circulation and planktonic populations in estuaries.Ecology 35:191–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, A. C., Jr., andJ. J. Orst. 1983. Factors regulating abundance and distribution of the shirmpNeomysis mercedis in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary.Trans. Am. Fish Soc. 112:476–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, E., andJ. Kalff. 1981. Empirical relationships between phytoplankton and zooplankton biomass in lakes.Can. J. Aquat. Sci. 38:458–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsi, J. J., T. E. Bowman, D. C. Marelli, andH. Hutchinson. 1983. Recent introduction of the planktonic calanoid copepodSinocalanus doerrii (Centropagidae) from mainland China to the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary of California.J. Plankton Res. 5(3):357–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patalas, K., andA. Salki. 1984. Effects of impoundment and diversions on the crustacean plankton of southern Indian Lake.Can J. Aquat. Sci. 41:613–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J. R., andG. W. Salt. 1981. Responses in growth, mortality, and reproduction to variable food levels by the rotifer,Asplanchna girodi.Ecology 62(66):1584–1596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegfried, C. A., andM. E. Kopache. 1980. Feeding ofNeomysis mercedis (Holmes).Biol. Bull. 159:193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. E. 1966a. Food habits of striped bass,Roccus saxatilis, in the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta.California Dept. Fish and Game Fish, Bull. 136:68–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. E. 1966b. Distribution and food habits of the American shad,Alosa sapidissima, in the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta.California Dept. Fish and Game Fish, Bull. 136:97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. E., D. W. Kohlhorst, andL. W. Miller. 1985. The decline of striped bass in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary, California.Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 114:12–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. E. 1966a. Seasonal distribution of crustacean plankters in the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta.California Dept. Fish and Game Fish, Bull. 133:95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. E. 1966b. Distribution and food habits of centrarchid fishes in the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta.California Dept. Fish and Game Fish, Bull. 133:144–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. E. 1966c. Distribution of threadfin shad,Drosoma petenense; tule perch,Hysterocarpus traskii; sculpin spp. and crayfish spp. in the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta.California Dept. Fish and Game Fish, Bull. 133:160–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, California Dept. of Water Resources, California Dept. of Fish and Game. 1977. Delta-Suisun Bay Ecological Studies. A Water Quality Data Report of the Coordinated Monitoring Program. Biological methods and data for 1968–1974. Sacramento, California.

  • Weglenska, T. 1971. The influence of various concentrations of planktonic crustacean filtrators.Ekol. Pol. 19:427–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winberg, G. G. 1956. Intensivnost abmena i pischevye potrebnosti ryb. Nauchn. Tr. Belarus Gos. Univ. Lenina. 253 pp. (Transl. Ser. No. 194,Fish Res. Board Can.)

  • Zurlini, G., I. Ferrari, andA. Nassogne. 1978. Reproduction and growth ofEuterpina acutifrons under experimental conditions.Mar. Biol. 46:59–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Orsi, J.J., Mecum, W.L. Zooplankton distribution and abundance in the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta in relation to certain environmental factors. Estuaries 9, 326–339 (1986). https://doi.org/10.2307/1351412

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1351412

Keywords

Navigation